Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ALRS vs ADP vs PAYX vs NBTB vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
ALRS vs ADP vs PAYX vs NBTB vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $774M | $91.08B | $36.13B | $2.52B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $330M | $21.60B | $6.03B | $902M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $27M | $4.35B | $1.60B | $169M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 70.6% | 47.5% | 73.4% | 73.6% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.7% | 19.2% | 37.1% | 24.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 20.4x | 18.3x | 11.5x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $441M | $9.07B | $5.02B | $327M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $67M | $3.35B | $1.63B | $185M | $343.34B |
ALRS vs ADP vs PAYX vs NBTB vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alerus Financial Co… (ALRS) | 100 | 153.3 | +53.3% |
| Automatic Data Proc… (ADP) | 100 | 151.9 | +51.9% |
| Paychex, Inc. (PAYX) | 100 | 132.8 | +32.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALRS vs ADP vs PAYX vs NBTB vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALRS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 3.3% vs JPM's 2.2%
- +44.4% vs PAYX's -31.6%
ADP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 9.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.6%
- 2.6% yield, 43-year raise streak, vs PAYX's 4.0%
PAYX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.23, yield 4.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.23, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 0.23, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1.28x
- 26.4% margin vs ALRS's 8.2%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs ALRS's -3.1%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs ADP's 207.7%
- PEG 0.81 vs PAYX's 2.14
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 18.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.14
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs ALRS's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 18.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.14 | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.4% margin vs ALRS's 8.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.23 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 43-year raise streak, vs PAYX's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.4% vs PAYX's -31.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs ALRS's 0.5%, ROIC 30.9% vs 1.9% |
ALRS vs ADP vs PAYX vs NBTB vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALRS vs ADP vs PAYX vs NBTB vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAYX leads in 1 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • ADP leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • ALRS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAYX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 848.5x ALRS's $330M. PAYX is the more profitable business, keeping 26.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALRS's 8.2%. On growth, PAYX holds the edge at +18.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $330M | $21.6B | $6.0B | $902M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $49M | $4.6B | $2.6B | $241M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $27M | $4.3B | $1.6B | $169M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $95M | $5.2B | $2.1B | $225M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.6% | +47.5% | +73.4% | +73.6% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +19.2% | +37.1% | +24.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +20.1% | +26.4% | +18.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.9% | +23.8% | +34.1% | +24.9% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +7.0% | +18.3% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.1% | +10.5% | -3.5% | +39.5% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 68% valuation discount to ALRS's 44.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs PAYX's 2.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $774M | $91.1B | $36.1B | $2.5B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $96.8B | $39.5B | $2.7B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 44.56x | 22.67x | 21.97x | 14.47x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.33x | 20.43x | 18.31x | 11.54x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.91x | 2.57x | 2.06x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.78x | 16.41x | 16.35x | 11.03x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.36x | 4.43x | 6.48x | 2.90x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 14.94x | 8.82x | 1.29x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.16x | 19.09x | 20.53x | 11.49x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ADP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ADP delivers a 68.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $69 in annual profit, vs $5 for ALRS. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADP scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.9% | +68.7% | +41.1% | +9.5% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +6.8% | +9.7% | +1.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +47.1% | +30.9% | +7.9% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.8% | +50.6% | +30.1% | +2.4% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 1.46x | 1.22x | 0.17x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $373M | $5.7B | $3.4B | $142M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $67M | $3.3B | $1.6B | $185M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $441M | $9.1B | $5.0B | $327M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.35x | 13.33x | 10.38x | 1.05x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,474 for ALRS. Over the past 12 months, ALRS leads with a +44.4% total return vs PAYX's -31.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs PAYX's -0.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.9% | -9.2% | -5.2% | +17.6% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.4% | -24.3% | -31.6% | +18.3% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.7% | +11.9% | -0.3% | +48.5% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.7% | +27.1% | +13.7% | +44.4% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.8% | +207.7% | +139.6% | +108.5% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.6% | +3.8% | -0.1% | +14.1% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALRS and PAYX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAYX is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALRS currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs PAYX's 65.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.25x | 0.23x | 0.76x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.35 | $315.98 | $154.90 | $48.27 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.26 | $188.16 | $85.45 | $39.20 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +71.6% | +65.0% | +99.8% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.4 | 54.6 | 56.2 | 63.1 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 154K | 2.6M | 3.1M | 266K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ADP and PAYX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALRS as "Hold", ADP as "Hold", PAYX as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.1% upside for PAYX (target: $109) vs -5.1% for ALRS (target: $29). For income investors, PAYX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.75 | $243.63 | $108.80 | $46.00 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 36 | 30 | 10 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +2.6% | +4.0% | +3.0% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 33 | 43 | 15 | 13 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.81 | $5.87 | $4.00 | $1.43 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.4% | +0.3% | +0.4% | +3.9% |
PAYX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). NBTB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ALRS vs ADP vs PAYX vs NBTB vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALRS or ADP or PAYX or NBTB or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALRS or ADP or PAYX or NBTB or JPM?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Alerus Financial Corporation at 44. 6x. On forward P/E, Alerus Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Paychex, Inc. 's 2. 14x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALRS or ADP or PAYX or NBTB or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +4. 7% for Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus ALRS's +106. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALRS or ADP or PAYX or NBTB or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paychex, Inc.
(PAYX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 317% more volatile than PAYX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALRS or ADP or PAYX or NBTB or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -3. 1% for Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to -18. 1% for Alerus Financial Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ADP leads at 7. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALRS or ADP or PAYX or NBTB or JPM?
Paychex, Inc.
(PAYX) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 7% net margin versus 5. 3% for Alerus Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 29. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAYX leads at 39. 6% versus 6. 9% for ALRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAYX leads at 72. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALRS or ADP or PAYX or NBTB or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Paychex, Inc. 's 2. 14x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Automatic Data Processing, Inc. — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAYX: 8. 1% to $108. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALRS or ADP or PAYX or NBTB or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Paychex, Inc. (PAYX) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is ALRS or ADP or PAYX or NBTB or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
(ADP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 25), 2. 6% yield, +207. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADP: +207. 7%, ALRS: +106. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALRS and ADP and PAYX and NBTB and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (ALRS (Financial Services) and ADP (Industrials) and PAYX (Industrials) and NBTB (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ALRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PAYX is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.