Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ALRS logo
ALRS
BANF logo
BANF
NBTB logo
NBTB
FFIN logo
FFIN
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ALRS
Alerus Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$774M
5Y Perf.+53.3%
BANF
BancFirst Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.94B
5Y Perf.+186.6%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
FFIN
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.+16.5%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ALRS logoALRS
BANF logoBANF
NBTB logoNBTB
FFIN logoFFIN
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$774M$3.94B$2.52B$4.83B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$330M$824M$902M$826M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$27M$241M$169M$254M$57.05B
Gross Margin70.6%82.9%73.6%71.8%60.0%
Operating Margin10.7%36.8%24.3%37.5%25.9%
Forward P/E10.3x15.9x11.5x16.5x14.4x
Total Debt$441M$134M$327M$22M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$67M$227M$185M$1.08B$343.34B

ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ALRS
BANF
NBTB
FFIN
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Alerus Financial Co… (ALRS)100153.3+53.3%
BancFirst Corporati… (BANF)100286.6+186.6%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
First Financial Ban… (FFIN)100116.5+16.5%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. NBT Bancorp Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. ALRS and FFIN also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ALRS
Alerus Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

ALRS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and bank quality.

  • Dividend streak 33 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 2.7%
  • NIM 3.3% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • +44.4% vs FFIN's -5.5%
Best for: income & stability and bank quality
BANF
BancFirst Corporation
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, BANF doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
  • Beta 0.76, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.60x
  • Beta 0.76 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
  • 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs ALRS's 2.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
FFIN
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 13.5%
  • 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs BANF's -9.3%
Best for: growth exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs BANF's 315.6%
  • PEG 0.81 vs FFIN's 3.67
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 16.5x), PEG 0.81 vs 3.67
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs ALRS's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFFIN logoFFIN11.7% NII/revenue growth vs BANF's -9.3%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 16.5x), PEG 0.81 vs 3.67
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs ALRS's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyNBTB logoNBTBBeta 0.76 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsNBTB logoNBTB3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs ALRS's 2.7%
Momentum (1Y)ALRS logoALRS+44.4% vs FFIN's -5.5%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs ALRS's 0.6%

ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ALRSAlerus Financial Corporation
FY 2025
Retirement and Benefit Services
63.7%$66M
Wealth Management
27.3%$28M
Interchange Fees
3.3%$3M
Deposit Account
2.7%$3M
Transactional Fees
1.8%$2M
Other Noninterest
1.2%$1M
BANFBancFirst Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
75.5%$71M
Fiduciary and Trust
24.5%$23M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
FFINFirst Financial Bankshares, Inc.
FY 2018
Fiduciary and Trust
43.4%$28M
Deposit Account
33.3%$22M
Mortgage Banking
23.3%$15M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFFINLAGGINGBANF

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 848.5x ALRS's $330M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALRS's 8.2%.

MetricALRS logoALRSAlerus Financial …BANF logoBANFBancFirst Corpora…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$330M$824M$902M$826M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$49M$326M$241M$320M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$27M$241M$169M$254M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$95M$237M$225M$283M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.6%+82.9%+73.6%+71.8%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+10.7%+36.8%+24.3%+37.5%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+8.2%+29.2%+18.8%+30.7%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+28.9%+28.7%+24.9%+34.3%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+73.1%+5.7%+39.5%-7.7%+16.0%
FFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 68% valuation discount to ALRS's 44.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANF offers better value at 0.87x vs FFIN's 4.22x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricALRS logoALRSAlerus Financial …BANF logoBANFBancFirst Corpora…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$774M$3.9B$2.5B$4.8B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$3.8B$2.7B$3.8B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS44.56x16.33x14.47x19.01x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.33x15.90x11.54x16.54x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.87x2.06x4.22x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple28.78x11.81x11.03x11.79x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.36x4.78x2.90x5.85x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.38x2.13x1.29x2.52x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.16x16.64x11.49x15.72x8.88x
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FFIN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $5 for ALRS. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FFIN scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricALRS logoALRSAlerus Financial …BANF logoBANFBancFirst Corpora…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.9%+13.7%+9.5%+14.2%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.5%+1.7%+1.1%+1.7%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.9%+12.3%+7.9%+12.4%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.8%+3.6%+2.4%+16.6%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956785
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.78x0.07x0.17x0.01x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$373M-$93M$142M-$1.1B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$67M$227M$185M$1.1B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$441M$134M$327M$22M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.35x0.98x1.05x1.54x0.74x
FFIN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,409 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, ALRS leads with a +44.4% total return vs FFIN's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FFIN's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricALRS logoALRSAlerus Financial …BANF logoBANFBancFirst Corpora…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+35.9%+9.7%+17.6%+13.5%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+44.4%-4.1%+18.3%-5.5%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+79.7%+32.1%+48.5%+24.3%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+4.7%+90.9%+44.4%-25.9%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+106.8%+315.6%+108.5%+136.4%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+21.6%+9.7%+14.1%+7.5%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ALRS and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NBTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALRS currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs BANF's 83.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricALRS logoALRSAlerus Financial …BANF logoBANFBancFirst Corpora…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.79x0.79x0.76x0.78x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$30.35$138.77$48.27$38.74$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$20.26$101.48$39.20$28.11$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.8%+83.8%+99.8%+86.9%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10071.459.663.161.359.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded154K126K266K683K7.0M
Evenly matched — ALRS and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ALRS and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ALRS as "Hold", BANF as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -5.1% for ALRS (target: $29). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs BANF's 1.58%.

MetricALRS logoALRSAlerus Financial …BANF logoBANFBancFirst Corpora…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$28.75$125.00$46.00$39.25$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts53101561
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%+1.6%+3.0%+2.2%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3330131515
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.81$1.83$1.43$0.74$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%0.0%+0.4%0.0%+3.9%
Evenly matched — ALRS and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NBTB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallFirst Financial Bankshares,… (FFIN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.

(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 3% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM?

On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Alerus Financial Corporation at 44. 6x. On forward P/E, Alerus Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -25. 9% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus ALRS's +106. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 24% more volatile than NBTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.

(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -9. 3% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 13. 5% year-over-year, compared to -18. 1% for Alerus Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM?

First Financial Bankshares, Inc.

(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 7% net margin versus 5. 3% for Alerus Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 37. 5% versus 6. 9% for ALRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANF leads at 82. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 16. 5x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 16. 6% to $39. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 6% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF).

09

Is ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

79), 1. 6% yield, +315. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANF: +315. 6%, ALRS: +106. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ALRS and BANF and NBTB and FFIN and JPM?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ALRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.