Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $774M | $3.94B | $2.52B | $4.83B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $330M | $824M | $902M | $826M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $27M | $241M | $169M | $254M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 70.6% | 82.9% | 73.6% | 71.8% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.7% | 36.8% | 24.3% | 37.5% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 15.9x | 11.5x | 16.5x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $441M | $134M | $327M | $22M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $67M | $227M | $185M | $1.08B | $343.34B |
ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alerus Financial Co… (ALRS) | 100 | 153.3 | +53.3% |
| BancFirst Corporati… (BANF) | 100 | 286.6 | +186.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 116.5 | +16.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALRS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 33 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 2.7%
- NIM 3.3% vs JPM's 2.2%
- +44.4% vs FFIN's -5.5%
Among these 5 stocks, BANF doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.76 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
- 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs ALRS's 2.7%
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 13.5%
- 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs BANF's -9.3%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs BANF's 315.6%
- PEG 0.81 vs FFIN's 3.67
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 16.5x), PEG 0.81 vs 3.67
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs ALRS's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs BANF's -9.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 16.5x), PEG 0.81 vs 3.67 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs ALRS's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs ALRS's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.4% vs FFIN's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs ALRS's 0.6% |
ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • ALRS leads 0 • BANF leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 848.5x ALRS's $330M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALRS's 8.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $330M | $824M | $902M | $826M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $49M | $326M | $241M | $320M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $27M | $241M | $169M | $254M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $95M | $237M | $225M | $283M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.6% | +82.9% | +73.6% | +71.8% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +36.8% | +24.3% | +37.5% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +29.2% | +18.8% | +30.7% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.9% | +28.7% | +24.9% | +34.3% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.1% | +5.7% | +39.5% | -7.7% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 68% valuation discount to ALRS's 44.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANF offers better value at 0.87x vs FFIN's 4.22x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $774M | $3.9B | $2.5B | $4.8B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $3.8B | $2.7B | $3.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 44.56x | 16.33x | 14.47x | 19.01x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.33x | 15.90x | 11.54x | 16.54x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.87x | 2.06x | 4.22x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.78x | 11.81x | 11.03x | 11.79x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.36x | 4.78x | 2.90x | 5.85x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 2.13x | 1.29x | 2.52x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.16x | 16.64x | 11.49x | 15.72x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $5 for ALRS. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FFIN scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.9% | +13.7% | +9.5% | +14.2% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +1.7% | +1.1% | +1.7% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +12.3% | +7.9% | +12.4% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.8% | +3.6% | +2.4% | +16.6% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 0.07x | 0.17x | 0.01x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $373M | -$93M | $142M | -$1.1B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $67M | $227M | $185M | $1.1B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $441M | $134M | $327M | $22M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.35x | 0.98x | 1.05x | 1.54x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,409 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, ALRS leads with a +44.4% total return vs FFIN's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FFIN's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.9% | +9.7% | +17.6% | +13.5% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.4% | -4.1% | +18.3% | -5.5% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.7% | +32.1% | +48.5% | +24.3% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.7% | +90.9% | +44.4% | -25.9% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.8% | +315.6% | +108.5% | +136.4% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.6% | +9.7% | +14.1% | +7.5% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALRS and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NBTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALRS currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs BANF's 83.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.79x | 0.76x | 0.78x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.35 | $138.77 | $48.27 | $38.74 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.26 | $101.48 | $39.20 | $28.11 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +83.8% | +99.8% | +86.9% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.4 | 59.6 | 63.1 | 61.3 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 154K | 126K | 266K | 683K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ALRS and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALRS as "Hold", BANF as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -5.1% for ALRS (target: $29). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs BANF's 1.58%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.75 | $125.00 | $46.00 | $39.25 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 3 | 10 | 15 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +1.6% | +3.0% | +2.2% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 33 | 30 | 13 | 15 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.81 | $1.83 | $1.43 | $0.74 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NBTB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 3% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Alerus Financial Corporation at 44. 6x. On forward P/E, Alerus Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -25. 9% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus ALRS's +106. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 24% more volatile than NBTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -9. 3% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 13. 5% year-over-year, compared to -18. 1% for Alerus Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 7% net margin versus 5. 3% for Alerus Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 37. 5% versus 6. 9% for ALRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANF leads at 82. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 16. 5x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 16. 6% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 6% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF).
09Is ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 1. 6% yield, +315. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANF: +315. 6%, ALRS: +106. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALRS and BANF and NBTB and FFIN and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.