Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AMTB vs INDB vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
AMTB vs INDB vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $991M | $4.01B | $341.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $521M | $1.17B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $205M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | 67.9% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 22.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 11.1x | 24.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.04B | $901M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $470M | $230M | $10.27B |
AMTB vs INDB vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB) | 100 | 156.9 | +56.9% |
| Independent Bank Co… (INDB) | 100 | 120.8 | +20.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMTB vs INDB vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 14.0%, EPS growth 386.4%
- NIM 3.7% vs INDB's 2.8%
- Lower P/E (13.1x vs 24.3x)
INDB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 25.3%, current ratio 0.55x
- Beta 0.85, yield 2.6%, current ratio 0.55x
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 115.0% 10Y total return vs INDB's 118.3%
- PEG 2.17 vs INDB's 2.71
- 27.8% margin vs AMTB's 11.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.8% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.1x vs 24.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs AMTB's 11.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs AMTB's 0.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.5% vs KO's +17.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs AMTB's 0.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.6% |
AMTB vs INDB vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMTB vs INDB vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 94.7x AMTB's $521M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMTB's 11.2%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $521M | $1.2B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $54M | $306M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $205M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $111M | $248M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.6% | +67.9% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +22.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +17.6% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +21.2% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | -31.7% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AMTB and INDB each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.2x trailing earnings, INDB trades at a 30% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KO offers better value at 2.34x vs INDB's 4.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $991M | $4.0B | $341.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $4.7B | $376.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.73x | 18.21x | 26.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.13x | 11.10x | 24.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.44x | 2.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.07x | 15.29x | 25.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 3.44x | 7.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 1.12x | 9.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.12x | 16.74x | 64.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $6 for INDB. INDB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMTB scores 7/9 vs INDB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +6.2% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.9% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +4.9% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +1.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.25x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $571M | $671M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $470M | $230M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $901M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.29x | 0.85x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INDB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,528 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,199 for INDB. Over the past 12 months, AMTB leads with a +44.5% total return vs KO's +17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INDB at 21.9% vs AMTB's 8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.6% | +11.6% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.5% | +36.2% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.9% | +80.9% | +39.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.7% | +22.0% | +65.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.4% | +118.3% | +115.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | +21.9% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMTB's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMTB currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs INDB's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.85x | -0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.38 | $87.00 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.62 | $57.01 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +93.2% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 55.5 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 226K | 328K | 13.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — INDB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMTB as "Hold", INDB as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.2% upside for INDB (target: $93) vs 1.7% for AMTB (target: $24). For income investors, INDB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.59% vs AMTB's 1.18%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $93.33 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 15 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +2.6% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $2.10 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +1.6% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). INDB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
AMTB vs INDB vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMTB or INDB or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Independent Bank Corp.
(INDB) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Independent Bank Corp. (INDB) offers the better valuation at 18. 2x trailing P/E (11. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMTB or INDB or KO?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corp.
(INDB) is the cheapest at 18. 2x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corp. is actually cheaper at 11. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Coca-Cola Company wins at 2. 17x versus Independent Bank Corp. 's 2. 71x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMTB or INDB or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
3%, compared to +22. 0% for Independent Bank Corp. (INDB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INDB returned +118. 3% versus AMTB's +40. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMTB or INDB or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
23β versus Amerant Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning AMTB is approximately -498% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Independent Bank Corp. (INDB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMTB or INDB or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Independent Bank Corp.
(INDB) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amerant Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 386. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1. 5% for Independent Bank Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMTB or INDB or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 8. 0% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 10. 1% for AMTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INDB leads at 67. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMTB or INDB or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 17x versus Independent Bank Corp. 's 2. 71x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corp. (INDB) trades at 11. 1x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 13. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INDB: 15. 2% to $93. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMTB or INDB or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Independent Bank Corp. (INDB) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 2% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB).
09Is AMTB or INDB or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, AMTB: +40. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMTB and INDB and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMTB (Financial Services) and INDB (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMTB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INDB is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.