Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
AUB logo
AUB
V logo
V
MA logo
MA
FIS logo
FIS
FISV logo
FISV
KO logo
KO
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AUB vs V vs MA vs FIS vs FISV vs KO vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AUB
Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.77B
5Y Perf.+74.0%
V
Visa Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$618.49B
5Y Perf.+66.9%
MA
Mastercard Incorporated

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$433.74B
5Y Perf.+65.7%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%
FISV
Fiserv, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$28.76B
5Y Perf.-13.2%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

AUB vs V vs MA vs FIS vs FISV vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AUB logoAUB
V logoV
MA logoMA
FIS logoFIS
FISV logoFISV
KO logoKO
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - Credit ServicesInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology ServicesBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$5.77B$618.49B$433.74B$20.26B$28.76B$355.61B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$2.02B$43.03B$33.94B$11.66B$21.09B$49.28B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$274M$22.24B$15.57B$2.67B$3.20B$13.70B$57.05B
Gross Margin60.9%81.3%83.0%37.6%60.8%61.7%60.0%
Operating Margin16.8%61.1%59.4%17.9%24.4%29.3%25.9%
Forward P/E10.8x24.5x24.9x6.2x6.6x25.3x14.4x
Total Debt$1.50B$25.17B$19.00B$4.01B$29.12B$45.49B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$234M$20.15B$10.57B$599M$798M$10.27B$343.34B

AUB vs V vs MA vs FIS vs FISV vs KO vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AUB
V
MA
FIS
FISV
KO
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Atlantic Union Bank… (AUB)100174.0+74.0%
Visa Inc. (V)100166.9+66.9%
Mastercard Incorpor… (MA)100165.7+65.7%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%
Fiserv, Inc. (FISV)10055.1-44.9%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AUB vs V vs MA vs FIS vs FISV vs KO vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AUB and MA are tied at the top with 2 categories each (7-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Mastercard Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. V, FIS, and FISV also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AUB
Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation
The Banking Pick

AUB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in bank quality.

  • NIM 3.1% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • 28.2% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
  • +32.5% vs FISV's -68.0%
Best for: bank quality
V
Visa Inc.
The Banking Pick

V ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 66.4%, current ratio 1.08x
  • 51.7% margin vs AUB's 13.5%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
The Banking Pick

MA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 16.4%, EPS growth 18.9%
  • Beta 0.49 vs AUB's 1.11
  • 29.5% ROA vs AUB's 0.8%, ROIC 56.5% vs 5.0%
Best for: growth exposure
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
  • Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
FISV
Fiserv, Inc.
The Value Pick

FISV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.19 vs AUB's 10.65
  • Lower P/E (6.6x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.19 vs 0.81
Best for: valuation efficiency
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Angle

KO doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs MA's 440.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAUB logoAUB28.2% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueFISV logoFISVLower P/E (6.6x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.19 vs 0.81
Quality / MarginsV logoV51.7% margin vs AUB's 13.5%
Stability / SafetyMA logoMABeta 0.49 vs AUB's 1.11
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)AUB logoAUB+32.5% vs FISV's -68.0%
Efficiency (ROA)MA logoMA29.5% ROA vs AUB's 0.8%, ROIC 56.5% vs 5.0%

AUB vs V vs MA vs FIS vs FISV vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
AUBAtlantic Union Bankshares Corporation
FY 2020
Overdraft Fees Net
28.5%$18M
Trust Asset Management Fees
17.3%$11M
Registered Advisor Management Fees Net
13.9%$9M
Maintenance Fees Other
12.0%$7M
Interchange Fees Net
11.5%$7M
Financial Service Other
10.1%$6M
Brokerage Management Fees Net
6.7%$4M
VVisa Inc.
FY 2025
Data Processing Revenues
50.0%$20.0B
Service
43.8%$17.5B
International Transaction Revenues
35.4%$14.2B
Service, Other
10.1%$4.1B
Client Incentives
-39.4%$-15,751,000,000
MAMastercard Incorporated
FY 2025
Payment Network
59.4%$19.5B
Value-Added Services And Solutions
40.6%$13.3B
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
FISVFiserv, Inc.
FY 2024
Processing And Services
81.3%$16.6B
Product
18.7%$3.8B
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

AUB vs V vs MA vs FIS vs FISV vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMALAGGINGFIS

Who Leads Where

FISV leads in 1 of 6 categories

MA leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • KO leads 1 • AUB leads 0 • V leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 2 tied

Explore the data ↓
FISFidelity National Inf…
0leads
VVisa Inc.
0leads
AUBAtlantic Union Banksh…
0leads
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
1leads
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
1leads
FISVFiserv, Inc.
1leads
MAMastercard Incorporat…
1leads
6 Total Categories

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — V and FIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 138.6x AUB's $2.0B. V is the more profitable business, keeping 51.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AUB's 13.5%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAUB logoAUBAtlantic Union Ba…V logoVVisa Inc.MA logoMAMastercard Incorp…FIS logoFISFidelity National…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.0B$43.0B$33.9B$11.7B$21.1B$49.3B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$397M$27.6B$21.6B$4.1B$7.5B$15.5B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$274M$22.2B$15.6B$2.7B$3.2B$13.7B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2.2B$21.2B$17.7B$2.8B$4.0B$12.6B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+60.9%+81.3%+83.0%+37.6%+60.8%+61.7%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+16.8%+61.1%+59.4%+17.9%+24.4%+29.3%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.5%+51.7%+45.9%+22.9%+15.2%+27.8%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+109.7%+49.2%+52.2%+23.9%+19.0%+25.5%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%-2.0%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+28.3%+35.3%+21.2%+30.6%-29.1%+18.2%+16.0%
Evenly matched — V and FIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FISV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 8.5x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 84% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.24x vs AUB's 19.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricAUB logoAUBAtlantic Union Ba…V logoVVisa Inc.MA logoMAMastercard Incorp…FIS logoFISFidelity National…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$5.8B$618.5B$433.7B$20.3B$28.8B$355.6B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7.0B$623.5B$442.2B$23.7B$57.1B$390.8B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS19.85x31.61x29.66x52.27x8.48x27.18x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.82x24.51x24.90x6.24x6.62x25.27x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate19.55x2.00x1.41x2.14x0.24x2.43x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.81x24.73x21.52x6.50x6.44x26.39x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.34x15.46x13.23x1.90x1.36x7.42x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.04x16.72x56.80x1.46x1.14x10.40x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.48x28.66x25.65x7.21x6.63x67.15x8.88x
FISV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

MA delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $6 for AUB. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MA scores 9/9 vs AUB's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAUB logoAUBAtlantic Union Ba…V logoVVisa Inc.MA logoMAMastercard Incorp…FIS logoFISFidelity National…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.1%+58.9%+2.1%+18.4%+12.4%+41.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.8%+22.7%+29.5%+7.5%+4.0%+13.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.0%+29.2%+56.5%+6.0%+8.1%+15.8%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.6%+36.2%+64.4%+6.6%+10.2%+17.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93596575
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.30x0.66x2.45x0.29x1.13x1.33x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.3B$5.0B$8.4B$3.4B$28.3B$35.2B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$234M$20.2B$10.6B$599M$798M$10.3B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.5B$25.2B$19.0B$4.0B$29.1B$45.5B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.51x26.72x27.23x21.16x6.39x10.70x0.74x
MA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, AUB leads with a +32.5% total return vs FISV's -68.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FISV's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAUB logoAUBAtlantic Union Ba…V logoVVisa Inc.MA logoMAMastercard Incorp…FIS logoFISFidelity National…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+15.5%-6.6%-12.7%-38.9%-18.0%+20.3%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+32.5%-12.5%-16.3%-49.4%-68.0%+17.2%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.3%+45.6%+32.8%-18.9%-54.3%+47.0%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+20.9%+42.0%+37.1%-67.3%-50.7%+65.6%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+95.1%+330.2%+440.0%-25.6%+1.8%+121.1%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.8%+13.3%+9.9%-6.8%-23.0%+13.7%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AUB's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 30.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAUB logoAUBAtlantic Union Ba…V logoVVisa Inc.MA logoMAMastercard Incorp…FIS logoFISFidelity National…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.11x0.54x0.49x0.61x0.87x-0.20x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$42.18$374.17$601.77$82.74$177.36$84.04$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$29.64$293.89$464.52$37.91$51.78$65.35$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.5%+86.2%+81.4%+47.4%+30.3%+98.3%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.946.945.830.840.860.659.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded878K6.4M3.1M5.6M5.7M12.7M7.0M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: AUB as "Buy", V as "Buy", MA as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", FISV as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs MA's 0.63%.

MetricAUB logoAUBAtlantic Union Ba…V logoVVisa Inc.MA logoMAMastercard Incorp…FIS logoFISFidelity National…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$45.50$368.91$660.43$62.88$71.15$86.13$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts18616437604861
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.7%+0.7%+0.6%+4.2%+2.5%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15181415615
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.49$2.36$3.07$1.63$2.04$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.2%+2.7%+7.0%+20.5%+0.2%+3.9%
Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FISV leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). MA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallMastercard Incorporated (MA)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AUB vs V vs MA vs FIS vs FISV vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AUB or V or MA or FIS or FISV or KO or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) is the stronger pick with 28.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AUB or V or MA or FIS or FISV or KO or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.

(FISV) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation's 10. 65x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AUB or V or MA or FIS or FISV or KO or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AUB or V or MA or FIS or FISV or KO or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation's 1. 11β — meaning AUB is approximately -653% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AUB or V or MA or FIS or FISV or KO or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) is pulling ahead at 28.

2% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FISV leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AUB or V or MA or FIS or FISV or KO or JPM?

Visa Inc.

(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MA leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AUB or V or MA or FIS or FISV or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation's 10. 65x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AUB or V or MA or FIS or FISV or KO or JPM?

In this comparison, FIS (4.

2% yield), AUB (3. 7% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), V (0. 7% yield), MA (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. FISV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is AUB or V or MA or FIS or FISV or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, FISV: +1. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AUB and V and MA and FIS and FISV and KO and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (AUB (Financial Services) and V (Financial Services) and MA (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and FISV (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AUB is a small-cap high-growth stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MA is a large-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. AUB, V, MA, FIS, KO, JPM pay a dividend while FISV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.