Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BYNO vs PSFE vs EVTC vs NXTT vs FIS vs KO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
BYNO vs PSFE vs EVTC vs NXTT vs FIS vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $43M | $367M | $1.62B | $16K | $20.26B | $355.61B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $1.74B | $951M | $12M | $11.66B | $49.28B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-740K | $-199M | $133M | $-156M | $2.67B | $13.70B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | 48.4% | 46.4% | 15.2% | 37.6% | 61.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 5.5% | 19.1% | -7.2% | 17.9% | 29.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 79.1x | 3.3x | 6.7x | 0.0x | 6.2x | 25.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $2.66B | $1.13B | $2M | $4.01B | $45.49B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $273K | $1.35B | $306M | $6M | $599M | $10.27B | $343.34B |
BYNO vs PSFE vs EVTC vs NXTT vs FIS vs KO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| byNordic Acquisitio… (BYNO) | 100 | 126.9 | +26.9% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 32.0 | -68.0% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 62.8 | -37.2% |
| Next Technology Hol… (NXTT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 42.1 | -57.9% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 123.1 | +23.1% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 259.5 | +159.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BYNO vs PSFE vs EVTC vs NXTT vs FIS vs KO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BYNO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.11 vs PSFE's 2.44
PSFE doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
EVTC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.2%, EPS growth 27.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
NXTT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and value.
- 5.5% revenue growth vs BYNO's -79.9%
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 14.4x)
FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- PEG 0.26 vs KO's 2.26
- Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
- 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 27.8% margin vs NXTT's -12.9%
- 13.1% ROA vs NXTT's -26.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -22.5%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- +21.8% vs NXTT's -99.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.5% revenue growth vs BYNO's -79.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 14.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs NXTT's -12.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs PSFE's 2.44 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.8% vs NXTT's -99.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs NXTT's -26.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -22.5% |
BYNO vs PSFE vs EVTC vs NXTT vs FIS vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BYNO vs PSFE vs EVTC vs NXTT vs FIS vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
PSFE leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • BYNO leads 0 • EVTC leads 0 • NXTT leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 207142.8x BYNO's $1M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXTT's -12.9%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $1.7B | $951M | $12M | $11.7B | $49.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $373M | $316M | -$86M | $4.1B | $15.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$739,762 | -$199M | $133M | -$156M | $2.7B | $13.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $174M | $165M | $145M | $2.8B | $12.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | +48.4% | +46.4% | +15.2% | +37.6% | +61.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | +5.5% | +19.1% | -7.2% | +17.9% | +29.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -54.7% | -11.4% | +13.9% | -12.9% | +22.9% | +27.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +10.0% | +17.4% | +12.0% | +23.9% | +25.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.4% | +8.4% | — | +30.1% | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.2% | -115.2% | -24.0% | -3.1% | +30.6% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, NXTT trades at a 100% valuation discount to BYNO's 79.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $367M | $1.6B | $16,069 | $20.3B | $355.6B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49M | $1.7B | $2.4B | -$4M | $23.7B | $390.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 79.06x | -2.26x | 11.95x | 0.00x | 52.27x | 27.18x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 3.27x | 6.71x | — | 6.24x | 25.27x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.33x | 0.00x | 2.14x | 2.43x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.24x | 7.92x | — | 6.50x | 26.39x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.22x | 1.74x | 0.00x | 1.90x | 7.42x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.63x | 2.37x | 0.00x | 1.46x | 10.40x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.64x | 11.95x | — | 7.21x | 67.15x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-30 for NXTT. NXTT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSFE's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVTC scores 7/9 vs BYNO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.0% | -28.6% | +18.7% | -30.0% | +18.4% | +41.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | -4.2% | +6.1% | -26.2% | +7.5% | +13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.6% | +10.2% | -22.5% | +6.0% | +15.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +3.6% | +10.5% | -26.3% | +6.6% | +17.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.06x | 1.58x | 0.00x | 0.29x | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $1.3B | $824M | -$4M | $3.4B | $35.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $272,588 | $1.3B | $306M | $6M | $599M | $10.3B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $2.7B | $1.1B | $2M | $4.0B | $45.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.75x | 3.10x | — | 21.16x | 10.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for NXTT. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs NXTT's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs NXTT's -89.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.3% | -11.0% | -8.0% | -73.5% | -38.9% | +20.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.0% | -45.0% | -28.7% | -99.3% | -49.4% | +17.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | -33.0% | -24.7% | -99.9% | -18.9% | +47.0% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -94.9% | -38.1% | -100.0% | -67.3% | +65.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -94.1% | +81.2% | -100.0% | -25.6% | +121.1% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.2% | -12.5% | -9.0% | -89.5% | -6.8% | +13.7% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BYNO and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYNO currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs NXTT's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.11x | 2.44x | 0.74x | 1.74x | 0.61x | -0.20x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.75 | $15.02 | $37.78 | $738.00 | $82.74 | $84.04 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.01 | $5.95 | $21.82 | $0.45 | $37.91 | $65.35 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +47.3% | +69.6% | +0.2% | +47.4% | +98.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.3 | 39.7 | 54.6 | 51.3 | 30.8 | 60.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 414 | 324K | 518K | 145K | 5.6M | 12.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PSFE as "Buy", EVTC as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs EVTC's 0.75%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.13 | $29.50 | — | $62.88 | $86.13 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 18 | — | 37 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.8% | — | +4.2% | +2.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — | 1 | 56 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.20 | — | $1.63 | $2.04 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +69.0% | +27.6% | +4.3% | 0.0% | +7.0% | +0.2% | +3.9% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PSFE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BYNO vs PSFE vs EVTC vs NXTT vs FIS vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BYNO or PSFE or EVTC or NXTT or FIS or KO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the stronger pick with 545. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BYNO or PSFE or EVTC or NXTT or FIS or KO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus byNordic Acquisition Corporation at 79. 1x. On forward P/E, Paysafe Limited is actually cheaper at 3. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BYNO or PSFE or EVTC or NXTT or FIS or KO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus NXTT's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BYNO or PSFE or EVTC or NXTT or FIS or KO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 44β — meaning PSFE is approximately -1317% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 4% for Paysafe Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BYNO or PSFE or EVTC or NXTT or FIS or KO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is pulling ahead at 545. 3% versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Next Technology Holding Inc. grew EPS 728. 0% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVTC leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BYNO or PSFE or EVTC or NXTT or FIS or KO or JPM?
Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the more profitable company, earning 1233% net margin versus -54. 7% for byNordic Acquisition Corporation — meaning it keeps 1233% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -690. 5% for NXTT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BYNO or PSFE or EVTC or NXTT or FIS or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) trades at 3. 3x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 22. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — BYNO or PSFE or EVTC or NXTT or FIS or KO or JPM?
In this comparison, FIS (4.
2% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), EVTC (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. BYNO, PSFE, NXTT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BYNO or PSFE or EVTC or NXTT or FIS or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 44 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, PSFE: -94. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BYNO and PSFE and EVTC and NXTT and FIS and KO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (BYNO (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology) and EVTC (Technology) and NXTT (Technology) and FIS (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BYNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock; NXTT is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. EVTC, FIS, KO, JPM pay a dividend while BYNO, PSFE, NXTT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.