Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CBFV vs FUNC vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
CBFV vs FUNC vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $190M | $272M | $896.00B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $69M | $120M | $280.33B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $25M | $57.05B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 62.5% | 70.3% | 60.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 27.2% | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 9.7x | 14.4x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $35M | $115M | $942.38B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $132M | $343.34B | $10.27B |
CBFV vs FUNC vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CB Financial Servic… (CBFV) | 100 | 171.9 | +71.9% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 313.9 | +213.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBFV vs FUNC vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CBFV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.41, yield 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 22.1%, current ratio 0.02x
- Beta 0.41, yield 2.6%, current ratio 0.02x
- NIM 3.3% vs JPM's 2.2%
FUNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 6.6%, EPS growth 19.7%
- PEG 0.74 vs KO's 2.26
- 6.6% NII/revenue growth vs CBFV's -13.3%
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.74 vs 2.26
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs FUNC's 361.3%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 27.8% margin vs CBFV's 7.1%
- 13.1% ROA vs CBFV's 0.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.6% NII/revenue growth vs CBFV's -13.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.74 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs CBFV's 7.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.4% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs CBFV's 0.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.1% |
CBFV vs FUNC vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CBFV vs FUNC vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
FUNC leads 2 • CBFV leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 4083.7x CBFV's $69M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CBFV's 7.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $69M | $120M | $280.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $35M | $81.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $25M | $57.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $16M | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.5% | +70.3% | +60.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +27.2% | +25.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +20.5% | +20.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +13.1% | +36.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +93.5% | +20.2% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FUNC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 73% valuation discount to CBFV's 40.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 0.85x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $190M | $272M | $896.0B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $193M | $255M | $1.50T | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 40.78x | 11.11x | 16.00x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.62x | 9.66x | 14.40x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.85x | 0.90x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.19x | 7.85x | 18.36x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.77x | 2.28x | 3.20x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 1.34x | 2.47x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.09x | 17.67x | 8.88x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $3 for CBFV. CBFV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUNC scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.2% | +12.6% | +15.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +1.2% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +7.1% | +4.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +9.8% | +8.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.56x | 2.60x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$17M | $599.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $132M | $343.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $115M | $942.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.21x | 0.99x | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $24,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,560 for KO. Over the past 12 months, FUNC leads with a +44.4% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 43.0% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.8% | +14.3% | -0.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.6% | +44.4% | +21.8% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.8% | +192.2% | +138.2% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.7% | +141.9% | +118.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.0% | +361.3% | +465.8% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.8% | +43.0% | +33.6% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CBFV and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CBFV currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.41x | 0.67x | 0.94x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.92 | $42.35 | $337.25 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.11 | $28.00 | $262.71 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.9% | +98.9% | +95.1% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.1 | 71.6 | 59.1 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 13K | 7.0M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CBFV and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CBFV as "Hold", FUNC as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -40.3% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, CBFV offers the higher dividend yield at 2.58% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $25.00 | $339.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 1 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +2.2% | +1.9% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 7 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.97 | $0.92 | $5.95 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FUNC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
CBFV vs FUNC vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBFV or FUNC or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 6.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBFV or FUNC or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 11.
1x versus CB Financial Services, Inc. at 40. 8x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 74x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBFV or FUNC or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +141.
9%, compared to +65. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus CBFV's +114. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBFV or FUNC or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CBFV or FUNC or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 6.
6% versus -13. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -61. 3% for CB Financial Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CBFV or FUNC or JPM or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 7. 1% for CB Financial Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 7. 7% for CBFV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CBFV or FUNC or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — CBFV or FUNC or JPM or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is CBFV or FUNC or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, JPM: +465. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CBFV and FUNC and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (CBFV (Financial Services) and FUNC (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CBFV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FUNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.