Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CCBG vs HBCP vs SBCF vs NBTB vs SFBS vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
CCBG vs HBCP vs SBCF vs NBTB vs SFBS vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $808M | $534M | $3.13B | $2.52B | $4.50B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $279M | $209M | $898M | $902M | $1.02B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $62M | $46M | $145M | $169M | $277M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | 71.0% | 62.8% | 73.6% | 51.8% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 30.0% | 27.7% | 20.8% | 24.3% | 33.6% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 11.4x | 12.8x | 11.5x | 12.9x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $93M | $58M | $1.34B | $327M | $1.51B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $142M | $181M | $185M | $95M | $10.27B |
CCBG vs HBCP vs SBCF vs NBTB vs SFBS vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital City Bank G… (CCBG) | 100 | 224.9 | +124.9% |
| Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) | 100 | 254.5 | +154.5% |
| Seacoast Banking Co… (SBCF) | 100 | 157.3 | +57.3% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| ServisFirst Bancsha… (SFBS) | 100 | 230.4 | +130.4% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCBG vs HBCP vs SBCF vs NBTB vs SFBS vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCBG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 257.8% 10Y total return vs HBCP's 185.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 1.24x
- NIM 3.9% vs SBCF's 2.7%
- Beta 0.56 vs SBCF's 1.10, lower leverage
HBCP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.74 vs SBCF's 6.84
- Lower P/E (11.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.74 vs 2.26
- +36.4% vs SFBS's +12.8%
Among these 6 stocks, SBCF doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.60x
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
SFBS doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 27.8% margin vs SBCF's 16.1%
- 13.1% ROA vs SBCF's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.74 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs SBCF's 16.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs SBCF's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.4% vs SFBS's +12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs SBCF's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.9% |
CCBG vs HBCP vs SBCF vs NBTB vs SFBS vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CCBG vs HBCP vs SBCF vs NBTB vs SFBS vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories
CCBG leads 1 • KO leads 1 • SBCF leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • SFBS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCBG leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 235.5x HBCP's $209M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBCF's 16.1%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $279M | $209M | $898M | $902M | $1.0B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $89M | $60M | $202M | $241M | $346M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $62M | $46M | $145M | $169M | $277M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $98M | $44M | $179M | $225M | $351M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.1% | +71.0% | +62.8% | +73.6% | +51.8% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.0% | +27.7% | +20.8% | +24.3% | +33.6% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +22.0% | +16.1% | +18.8% | +27.2% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.1% | +21.2% | +19.9% | +24.9% | +34.5% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.8% | +20.7% | -27.5% | +39.5% | +32.8% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
HBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, HBCP trades at a 57% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HBCP offers better value at 0.75x vs SBCF's 10.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $808M | $534M | $3.1B | $2.5B | $4.5B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $839M | $450M | $4.3B | $2.7B | $5.9B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.09x | 11.60x | 20.30x | 14.47x | 16.28x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.04x | 11.44x | 12.81x | 11.54x | 12.87x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.94x | 0.75x | 10.84x | 2.06x | 1.61x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.39x | 7.75x | 22.99x | 11.03x | 17.29x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 2.55x | 3.60x | 2.90x | 4.43x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 1.23x | 0.97x | 1.29x | 2.43x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.10x | 12.03x | 17.51x | 11.49x | 12.89x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $6 for SBCF. HBCP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HBCP scores 9/9 vs SBCF's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.5% | +11.0% | +5.8% | +9.5% | +15.8% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +1.3% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +1.6% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +7.7% | +3.9% | +7.9% | +7.3% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +5.7% | +3.7% | +2.4% | +4.5% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.13x | 0.44x | 0.17x | 0.81x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | -$84M | $1.2B | $142M | $1.4B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $142M | $181M | $185M | $95M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $93M | $58M | $1.3B | $327M | $1.5B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.56x | 0.96x | 0.66x | 1.05x | 0.75x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CCBG five years ago would be worth $19,565 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,006 for SBCF. Over the past 12 months, HBCP leads with a +36.4% total return vs SFBS's +12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBCP at 27.5% vs SBCF's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | +19.6% | +2.1% | +17.6% | +15.8% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.9% | +36.4% | +27.3% | +18.3% | +12.8% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.7% | +107.3% | +47.0% | +48.5% | +92.8% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.7% | +93.5% | +0.1% | +44.4% | +27.6% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +257.8% | +185.9% | +115.4% | +108.5% | +260.6% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.9% | +27.5% | +13.7% | +14.1% | +24.5% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBCF's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs SBCF's 90.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 0.73x | 1.10x | 0.76x | 1.06x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.78 | $68.40 | $35.55 | $48.27 | $90.64 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.94 | $48.30 | $24.46 | $39.20 | $67.20 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +99.5% | +90.2% | +99.8% | +90.9% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 65.3 | 58.4 | 63.1 | 65.1 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 77K | 88K | 679K | 266K | 211K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCBG as "Hold", HBCP as "Buy", SBCF as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", SFBS as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.2% upside for SFBS (target: $90) vs -26.6% for HBCP (target: $50). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs SFBS's 1.62%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.50 | $50.00 | $32.50 | $46.00 | $90.00 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 3 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +1.7% | +2.3% | +3.0% | +1.6% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 12 | 4 | 13 | 1 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $1.15 | $0.74 | $1.43 | $1.34 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.7% | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
HBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). CCBG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
CCBG vs HBCP vs SBCF vs NBTB vs SFBS vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB or SFBS or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB or SFBS or KO?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancorp, Inc.
(HBCP) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Home Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Home Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 74x versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 6. 84x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB or SFBS or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
(CCBG) delivered a total return of +95. 7%, compared to +0. 1% for Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (SBCF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SFBS returned +260. 6% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB or SFBS or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 1. 10β — meaning SBCF is approximately -648% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB or SFBS or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Home Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 28. 4% year-over-year, compared to 11. 3% for Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB or SFBS or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 16. 7% for Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SFBS leads at 33. 6% versus 21. 4% for SBCF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCBG leads at 87. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB or SFBS or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida's 6. 84x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) trades at 11. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 13. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SFBS: 9. 2% to $90. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB or SFBS or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 6% for ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS).
09Is CCBG or HBCP or SBCF or NBTB or SFBS or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, SBCF: +115. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCBG and HBCP and SBCF and NBTB and SFBS and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (CCBG (Financial Services) and HBCP (Financial Services) and SBCF (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and SFBS (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CCBG is a small-cap deep-value stock; HBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBCF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFBS is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.