Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CNTA logo
CNTA
VERA logo
VERA
IMVT logo
IMVT
PRAX logo
PRAX
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CNTA vs VERA vs IMVT vs PRAX vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CNTA
Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$6.15B
5Y Perf.+82.6%
VERA
Vera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.46B
5Y Perf.+98.6%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.+121.8%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.70B
5Y Perf.-9.3%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+49.4%

CNTA vs VERA vs IMVT vs PRAX vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CNTA logoCNTA
VERA logoVERA
IMVT logoIMVT
PRAX logoPRAX
KO logoKO
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$6.15B$2.46B$6.90B$7.70B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$-251M$-369M$-506M$-327M$13.70B
Gross Margin100.0%61.7%
Operating Margin-13.8%29.3%
Forward P/E25.3x
Total Debt$8M$77M$72K$110K$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$61M$355M$902M$357M$10.27B

CNTA vs VERA vs IMVT vs PRAX vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CNTA
VERA
IMVT
PRAX
KO
StockMay 21Jun 26Return
Centessa Pharmaceut… (CNTA)100182.6+82.6%
Vera Therapeutics, … (VERA)100198.6+98.6%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100221.8+121.8%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10090.7-9.3%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100149.4+49.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CNTA vs VERA vs IMVT vs PRAX vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. VERA and PRAX also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CNTA
Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc
The Income Pick

CNTA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 1.24
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 8.57x
  • Beta 1.24 vs IMVT's 1.66
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
VERA
Vera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

VERA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.

  • Beta 1.42, current ratio 13.64x
  • 35.4% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: defensive
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 237.9% 10Y total return vs VERA's 197.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +491.9% vs KO's +17.2%
Best for: momentum
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Growth Play

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
  • 27.8% margin vs CNTA's -13.2%
  • 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 13.1% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthVERA logoVERA35.4% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs CNTA's -13.2%
Stability / SafetyCNTA logoCNTABeta 1.24 vs IMVT's 1.66
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+491.9% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

CNTA vs VERA vs IMVT vs PRAX vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CNTACentessa Pharmaceuticals plc
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$15M
VERAVera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

CNTA vs VERA vs IMVT vs PRAX vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGIMVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNTA's -13.2%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$0$0$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$257M-$383M-$532M-$357M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$251M-$369M-$506M-$327M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$209M-$187M-$407M-$283M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+100.0%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-13.8%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-13.2%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-12.9%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-160.0%-108.6%-14.1%+2.7%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CNTA and VERA and KO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$6.1B$2.5B$6.9B$7.7B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.1B$2.2B$6.0B$7.3B$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-27.21x-7.35x-12.14x-19.77x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue409.72x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share10.23x3.64x7.19x6.83x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.15x
Evenly matched — CNTA and VERA and KO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-75 for VERA. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs VERA's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-60.4%-74.9%-68.2%-43.0%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-44.2%-60.2%-62.2%-40.2%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-51.2%-54.6%-65.0%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-35.7%-48.1%-68.3%-49.3%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–951237
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.13x0.00x0.00x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$54M-$277M-$902M-$357M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$61M$355M$902M$357M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$8M$77M$72,000$110,000$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-23.48x-31.22x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,580 for PRAX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+67.7%-29.5%+29.8%-6.9%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+229.9%+52.1%+110.9%+491.9%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+756.0%+280.7%+55.0%+1757.4%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+58.9%+122.0%+213.0%-14.2%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+82.6%+197.9%+237.9%-36.1%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+104.6%+56.1%+15.7%+164.8%+13.7%
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CNTA and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNTA currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs VERA's 61.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.24x1.42x1.66x1.55x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$40.25$56.05$36.27$366.52$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.77$19.07$14.32$37.19$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.7%+61.1%+92.7%+72.7%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.146.957.931.960.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.7M1.1M1.9M396K12.7M
Evenly matched — CNTA and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: CNTA as "Buy", VERA as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 134.5% upside for VERA (target: $80) vs -0.6% for CNTA (target: $40). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$39.50$80.33$43.67$607.15$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts1414231648
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises56
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.2%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CNTA vs VERA vs IMVT vs PRAX vs KO: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CNTA or VERA or IMVT or PRAX or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger pick with 1.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc (CNTA) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — CNTA or VERA or IMVT or PRAX or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -14. 2% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +237. 9% versus PRAX's -36. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — CNTA or VERA or IMVT or PRAX or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning IMVT is approximately -928% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — CNTA or VERA or IMVT or PRAX or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is pulling ahead at 1.

9% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc grew EPS 29. 1% year-over-year, compared to -69. 5% for Vera Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — CNTA or VERA or IMVT or PRAX or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -1316. 9% for Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -1384. 6% for CNTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNTA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is CNTA or VERA or IMVT or PRAX or KO more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VERA: 134.

5% to $80. 33.

07

Which pays a better dividend — CNTA or VERA or IMVT or PRAX or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. CNTA, VERA, IMVT, PRAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is CNTA or VERA or IMVT or PRAX or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, PRAX: -36. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between CNTA and VERA and IMVT and PRAX and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (CNTA (Healthcare) and VERA (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and PRAX (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

KO pays a dividend while CNTA, VERA, IMVT, PRAX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.