Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
COSO vs GSBC vs FFIN vs IBCP vs KO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
COSO vs GSBC vs FFIN vs IBCP vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $323M | $865M | $4.83B | $730M | $355.61B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $136M | $344M | $826M | $310M | $49.28B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $71M | $254M | $69M | $13.70B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 57.9% | 67.0% | 71.8% | 69.1% | 61.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.0% | 25.4% | 37.5% | 26.2% | 29.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 11.6x | 13.3x | 16.5x | 10.0x | 25.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $405M | $22M | $117M | $45.49B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $98M | $1.08B | $52M | $10.27B | $343.34B |
COSO vs GSBC vs FFIN vs IBCP vs KO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CoastalSouth Bancsh… (COSO) | 100 | 280.4 | +180.4% |
| Great Southern Banc… (GSBC) | 100 | 188.0 | +88.0% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 116.5 | +16.5% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 238.9 | +138.9% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: COSO vs GSBC vs FFIN vs IBCP vs KO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
COSO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.53 vs FFIN's 3.67
- Lower P/E (11.6x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.53 vs 0.81
- Beta 0.51 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
- +35.3% vs FFIN's -5.5%
GSBC is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.6% vs JPM's 2.2%
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 13.5%
- 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs GSBC's -3.4%
- 30.7% margin vs COSO's 18.4%
IBCP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.72, yield 2.9%, current ratio 370.62x
- 2.9% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 13.1% ROA vs COSO's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 9.4%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 194.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs GSBC's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.53 vs 0.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs COSO's 18.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.3% vs FFIN's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs COSO's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 9.4% |
COSO vs GSBC vs FFIN vs IBCP vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
COSO vs GSBC vs FFIN vs IBCP vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories
COSO leads 1 • KO leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • GSBC leads 0 • IBCP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2067.6x COSO's $136M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COSO's 18.4%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $136M | $344M | $826M | $310M | $49.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31M | $94M | $320M | $89M | $15.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | $71M | $254M | $69M | $13.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $63M | $66M | $283M | $70M | $12.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.9% | +67.0% | +71.8% | +69.1% | +61.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +25.4% | +37.5% | +26.2% | +29.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +20.6% | +30.7% | +22.1% | +27.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +46.6% | +19.3% | +34.3% | +22.6% | +25.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.7% | +12.6% | -7.7% | +2.3% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
COSO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.9x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 60% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), COSO offers better value at 0.57x vs FFIN's 4.22x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $323M | $865M | $4.8B | $730M | $355.6B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $311M | $1.2B | $3.8B | $795M | $390.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.48x | 12.26x | 19.01x | 10.85x | 27.18x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.62x | 13.32x | 16.54x | 9.99x | 25.27x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.57x | 1.53x | 4.22x | 2.06x | 2.43x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.31x | 13.42x | 11.79x | 9.78x | 26.39x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.38x | 2.52x | 5.85x | 2.32x | 7.42x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 1.36x | 2.52x | 1.47x | 10.40x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.27x | 13.05x | 15.72x | 10.41x | 67.15x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $11 for COSO. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GSBC scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | +11.3% | +14.2% | +14.2% | +41.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.2% | +1.7% | +1.3% | +13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | +7.2% | +12.4% | +10.2% | +15.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +2.7% | +16.6% | +2.6% | +17.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.64x | 0.01x | 0.23x | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | $307M | -$1.1B | $65M | $35.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $98M | $1.1B | $52M | $10.3B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $405M | $22M | $117M | $45.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.58x | 0.77x | 1.54x | 0.91x | 10.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,409 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, COSO leads with a +35.3% total return vs FFIN's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FFIN's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.7% | +24.4% | +13.5% | +12.0% | +20.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.3% | +35.0% | -5.5% | +16.4% | +17.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.6% | +50.9% | +24.3% | +110.4% | +47.0% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.1% | +50.7% | -25.9% | +80.9% | +65.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.2% | +130.6% | +136.4% | +194.4% | +121.1% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.1% | +14.7% | +7.5% | +28.1% | +13.7% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GSBC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GSBC currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 86.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 0.73x | 0.78x | 0.72x | -0.20x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.42 | $76.92 | $38.74 | $39.16 | $84.04 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.24 | $53.76 | $28.11 | $29.63 | $65.35 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.3% | +98.6% | +86.9% | +90.6% | +98.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.7 | 70.1 | 61.3 | 61.2 | 60.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 92K | 95K | 683K | 135K | 12.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IBCP and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: COSO as "Buy", GSBC as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -18.3% for GSBC (target: $62). For income investors, IBCP offers the higher dividend yield at 2.92% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.00 | $62.00 | $39.25 | $38.00 | $86.13 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 6 | 15 | 7 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.2% | +2.2% | +2.9% | +2.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 15 | 11 | 56 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.64 | $0.74 | $1.03 | $2.04 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +5.1% | 0.0% | +1.7% | +0.2% | +3.9% |
FFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). COSO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
COSO vs GSBC vs FFIN vs IBCP vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is COSO or GSBC or FFIN or IBCP or KO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. (GSBC). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. (COSO) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — COSO or GSBC or FFIN or IBCP or KO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
9x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. wins at 0. 53x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — COSO or GSBC or FFIN or IBCP or KO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -25. 9% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus COSO's +35. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — COSO or GSBC or FFIN or IBCP or KO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — COSO or GSBC or FFIN or IBCP or KO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -3. 4% for Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. (GSBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — COSO or GSBC or FFIN or IBCP or KO or JPM?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 7% net margin versus 18. 3% for CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 37. 5% versus 22. 9% for COSO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 71. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is COSO or GSBC or FFIN or IBCP or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. (COSO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 53x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 16. 6% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — COSO or GSBC or FFIN or IBCP or KO or JPM?
In this comparison, IBCP (2.
9% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), FFIN (2. 2% yield), GSBC (2. 2% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. COSO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is COSO or GSBC or FFIN or IBCP or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, COSO: +35. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between COSO and GSBC and FFIN and IBCP and KO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (COSO (Financial Services) and GSBC (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and IBCP (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: COSO is a small-cap deep-value stock; GSBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. GSBC, FFIN, IBCP, KO, JPM pay a dividend while COSO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.