DAAQ vs HUT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs JPM

For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 7% for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Digital Asset Acquisition Corp. at 27. 9x.

Over the past 5 years, Hut 8 Corp.

(HUT) delivered a total return of +446. 7%, compared to -53. 0% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +734. 1% versus CLSK's -82. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.

(DAAQ) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 12β versus Hut 8 Corp. 's 4. 93β — meaning HUT is approximately -4256% more volatile than DAAQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus -90. 7% for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Digital Asset Acquisition Corp. grew EPS 31. 1% year-over-year, compared to -673. 5% for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -1499. 6% for Hut 8 Corp. — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -21. 0% for HUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLSK: 14.

7% to $18. 90.

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield), CLSK (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. DAAQ, HUT, MARA, RIOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.

(DAAQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 12)). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DAAQ: -10. 0%, CLSK: -82. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: DAAQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; RIOT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CLSK is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while DAAQ, HUT, MARA, RIOT, CLSK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.