Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EML vs ASTE vs TWIN vs CMI vs TEX vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
EML vs ASTE vs TWIN vs CMI vs TEX vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Agricultural - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $131M | $1.18B | $289M | $91.13B | $4.20B | $896.00B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $243M | $1.48B | $364M | $33.89B | $5.93B | $280.33B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $26M | $27M | $2.67B | $111M | $57.05B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 21.7% | 26.1% | 28.2% | 25.4% | 17.3% | 60.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | 3.7% | 4.3% | 11.2% | 5.5% | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 14.3x | 27.4x | 22.7x | 13.0x | 14.4x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $54M | $320M | $49M | $8.11B | $2.81B | $942.38B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $72M | $16M | $2.85B | $772M | $343.34B | $10.27B |
EML vs ASTE vs TWIN vs CMI vs TEX vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Eastern Company (EML) | 100 | 121.7 | +21.7% |
| Astec Industries, I… (ASTE) | 100 | 110.9 | +10.9% |
| Twin Disc, Incorpor… (TWIN) | 100 | 361.4 | +261.4% |
| Cummins Inc. (CMI) | 100 | 380.7 | +280.7% |
| Terex Corporation (TEX) | 100 | 339.9 | +239.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EML vs ASTE vs TWIN vs CMI vs TEX vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EML is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 43.2%, current ratio 3.59x
- Beta 0.66, yield 2.0%, current ratio 3.59x
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 25.3x)
- Beta 0.66 vs TEX's 2.09, lower leverage
ASTE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.1%, EPS growth 7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
TWIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth and momentum.
- 15.5% revenue growth vs EML's -8.7%
- +163.8% vs EML's -6.1%
CMI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
TEX is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.14 vs KO's 2.26
In this particular matchup, JPM is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 27.8% margin vs EML's 1.6%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
- 13.1% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.5% revenue growth vs EML's -8.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs EML's 1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs TEX's 2.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.8% vs EML's -6.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.5% |
EML vs ASTE vs TWIN vs CMI vs TEX vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EML vs ASTE vs TWIN vs CMI vs TEX vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories
EML leads 1 • CMI leads 1 • ASTE leads 0 • TWIN leads 0 • TEX leads 0 • JPM leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1155.0x EML's $243M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EML's 1.6%. On growth, TEX holds the edge at +41.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $243M | $1.5B | $364M | $33.9B | $5.9B | $280.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $84M | $30M | $4.6B | $444M | $81.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $26M | $27M | $2.7B | $111M | $57.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $37M | $774,000 | $2.7B | $322M | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +26.1% | +28.2% | +25.4% | +17.3% | +60.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +3.7% | +4.3% | +11.2% | +5.5% | +25.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +1.7% | +7.3% | +7.9% | +1.9% | +20.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +2.5% | +0.2% | +7.9% | +5.4% | +36.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.7% | +20.3% | +19.0% | +2.7% | +41.1% | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.6% | -90.3% | +3.1% | -21.0% | +309.0% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
EML leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 50% valuation discount to CMI's 32.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TEX offers better value at 0.21x vs CMI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $131M | $1.2B | $289M | $91.1B | $4.2B | $896.0B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $178M | $1.4B | $322M | $96.4B | $6.2B | $1.50T | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.89x | 30.58x | -143.00x | 32.17x | 19.16x | 16.00x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.98x | 14.27x | 27.42x | 22.72x | 13.02x | 14.40x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.85x | 0.21x | 0.90x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.88x | 14.03x | 12.98x | 19.40x | 9.85x | 18.36x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 0.84x | 0.85x | 2.71x | 0.77x | 3.20x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | 1.75x | 1.69x | 6.82x | 2.02x | 2.47x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.79x | 54.94x | 32.73x | 38.19x | 13.04x | 8.88x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $3 for EML. TWIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CMI scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.1% | +3.8% | +15.3% | +20.3% | +4.1% | +15.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +2.0% | +7.1% | +7.8% | +1.6% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +6.2% | +3.9% | +16.1% | +8.6% | +4.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +7.2% | +4.5% | +17.3% | +9.9% | +8.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.47x | 0.30x | 0.61x | 1.34x | 2.60x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $46M | $248M | $33M | $5.3B | $2.0B | $599.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $72M | $16M | $2.8B | $772M | $343.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $54M | $320M | $49M | $8.1B | $2.8B | $942.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.90x | 5.48x | 6.79x | 12.15x | 4.74x | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CMI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CMI five years ago would be worth $27,921 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,258 for EML. Over the past 12 months, TWIN leads with a +163.8% total return vs EML's -6.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CMI at 43.7% vs TEX's 5.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | +15.7% | +24.1% | +27.1% | +16.6% | -0.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.1% | +26.1% | +163.8% | +105.6% | +36.2% | +21.8% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.5% | +18.4% | +76.8% | +196.7% | +17.8% | +138.2% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.4% | -15.7% | +46.7% | +179.2% | +43.1% | +118.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.1% | +3.4% | +105.6% | +530.6% | +225.2% | +465.8% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.7% | +5.8% | +20.9% | +43.7% | +5.6% | +33.6% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TEX's 2.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ASTE's 78.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 1.55x | 1.10x | 1.64x | 2.09x | 0.94x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.77 | $65.65 | $20.92 | $718.08 | $71.50 | $337.25 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.61 | $36.43 | $7.43 | $307.90 | $41.70 | $262.71 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.2% | +78.2% | +95.7% | +91.9% | +89.2% | +95.1% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 45.2 | 62.0 | 49.0 | 54.4 | 59.1 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 197K | 70K | 759K | 1.0M | 7.0M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASTE as "Buy", TWIN as "Hold", CMI as "Buy", TEX as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.5% upside for TEX (target: $81) vs -29.9% for ASTE (target: $36). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs TWIN's 0.82%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $36.00 | — | $727.91 | $81.33 | $339.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 4 | 51 | 31 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.0% | +0.8% | +1.2% | +1.1% | +1.9% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | $0.51 | $0.16 | $7.61 | $0.68 | $5.95 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +1.3% | +3.9% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EML leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
EML vs ASTE vs TWIN vs CMI vs TEX vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EML or ASTE or TWIN or CMI or TEX or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) is the stronger pick with 15.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 7% for The Eastern Company (EML). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EML or ASTE or TWIN or CMI or TEX or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Cummins Inc. at 32. 2x. On forward P/E, The Eastern Company is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Terex Corporation wins at 0. 14x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EML or ASTE or TWIN or CMI or TEX or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Cummins Inc.
(CMI) delivered a total return of +179. 2%, compared to -27. 4% for The Eastern Company (EML). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMI returned +530. 6% versus ASTE's +3. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EML or ASTE or TWIN or CMI or TEX or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Terex Corporation's 2. 09β — meaning TEX is approximately -1145% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EML or ASTE or TWIN or CMI or TEX or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) is pulling ahead at 15.
5% versus -8. 7% for The Eastern Company (EML). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astec Industries, Inc. grew EPS 784. 2% year-over-year, compared to -117. 7% for Twin Disc, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWIN leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EML or ASTE or TWIN or CMI or TEX or JPM or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -0. 6% for Twin Disc, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 2. 9% for TWIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EML or ASTE or TWIN or CMI or TEX or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Terex Corporation (TEX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 14x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Eastern Company (EML) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 27. 4x for Twin Disc, Incorporated — 16. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEX: 27. 5% to $81. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — EML or ASTE or TWIN or CMI or TEX or JPM or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 8% for Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN).
09Is EML or ASTE or TWIN or CMI or TEX or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Terex Corporation (TEX) carries a higher beta of 2. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, TEX: +225. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EML and ASTE and TWIN and CMI and TEX and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (EML (Industrials) and ASTE (Industrials) and TWIN (Industrials) and CMI (Industrials) and TEX (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EML is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASTE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TWIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CMI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.