Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EML vs KFRC vs ASTE vs KELYA vs MAN vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Agricultural - Machinery
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Banks - Diversified
EML vs KFRC vs ASTE vs KELYA vs MAN vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Staffing & Employment Services | Agricultural - Machinery | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $131M | $914M | $1.18B | $417M | $1.57B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $243M | $1.33B | $1.48B | $4.13B | $17.96B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $35M | $26M | $-266M | $-13M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 21.7% | 27.2% | 26.1% | 19.5% | 16.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | 3.8% | 3.7% | -1.9% | 0.8% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 20.8x | 14.3x | 13.3x | 9.2x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $54M | $70M | $320M | $159M | $2.39B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $2M | $72M | $33M | $871M | $343.34B |
EML vs KFRC vs ASTE vs KELYA vs MAN vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Eastern Company (EML) | 100 | 121.7 | +21.7% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 170.9 | +70.9% |
| Astec Industries, I… (ASTE) | 100 | 110.9 | +10.9% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 76.1 | -23.9% |
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 49.5 | -50.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EML vs KFRC vs ASTE vs KELYA vs MAN vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EML is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 43.2%, current ratio 3.59x
KFRC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 3.1%
- Beta 0.27, yield 3.1%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.27 vs ASTE's 1.55
- 9.2% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 19.1% vs -4.0%
ASTE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.1%, EPS growth 7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- 8.1% revenue growth vs EML's -8.7%
- +26.1% vs MAN's -17.3%
KELYA doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
MAN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 14.4x)
- 4.2% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs KFRC's 226.5%
- 20.4% margin vs KELYA's -6.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.1% revenue growth vs EML's -8.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 14.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs KELYA's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs ASTE's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.1% vs MAN's -17.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 19.1% vs -4.0% |
EML vs KFRC vs ASTE vs KELYA vs MAN vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EML vs KFRC vs ASTE vs KELYA vs MAN vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
KFRC leads 2 • MAN leads 1 • EML leads 0 • ASTE leads 0 • KELYA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1155.0x EML's $243M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -6.4%. On growth, ASTE holds the edge at +20.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $243M | $1.3B | $1.5B | $4.1B | $18.0B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $56M | $84M | -$35M | $236M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $35M | $26M | -$266M | -$13M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $43M | $37M | $66M | -$161M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +27.2% | +26.1% | +19.5% | +16.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +3.8% | +3.7% | -1.9% | +0.8% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +2.6% | +1.7% | -6.4% | -0.1% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +3.3% | +2.5% | +1.6% | -0.9% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.7% | +0.1% | +20.3% | -10.7% | +7.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.6% | +2.2% | -90.3% | -2.1% | +36.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 48% valuation discount to ASTE's 30.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MAN's 9.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.4x.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $131M | $914M | $1.2B | $417M | $1.6B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $178M | $981M | $1.4B | $544M | $3.1B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.89x | 25.51x | 30.58x | -1.66x | -117.24x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.98x | 20.77x | 14.27x | 13.34x | 9.25x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.88x | 17.64x | 14.03x | — | 9.53x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 0.69x | 0.84x | 0.10x | 0.09x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | 7.13x | 1.75x | 0.43x | 0.77x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.79x | 19.53x | 54.94x | 3.66x | — | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EML scores 6/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.1% | +27.2% | +3.8% | -24.6% | -0.6% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +9.2% | +2.0% | -11.3% | -0.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +19.1% | +6.2% | -4.0% | +5.6% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +20.1% | +7.2% | -4.3% | +6.2% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.56x | 0.47x | 0.16x | 1.16x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $46M | $68M | $248M | $126M | $1.5B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $2M | $72M | $33M | $871M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $54M | $70M | $320M | $159M | $2.4B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.90x | — | 5.48x | -8.78x | 1.98x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,750 for MAN. Over the past 12 months, ASTE leads with a +26.1% total return vs MAN's -17.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs MAN's -19.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | +62.1% | +15.7% | +41.1% | +15.5% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.1% | +25.9% | +26.1% | +3.0% | -17.3% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.5% | -11.1% | +18.4% | -28.6% | -46.8% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.4% | -9.2% | -15.7% | -46.1% | -62.5% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.1% | +226.5% | +3.4% | -24.0% | -24.5% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.7% | -3.9% | +5.8% | -10.6% | -19.0% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASTE's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs MAN's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 0.27x | 1.55x | 0.92x | 0.69x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.77 | $50.70 | $65.65 | $14.94 | $47.34 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.61 | $24.49 | $36.43 | $7.98 | $25.15 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.2% | +98.6% | +78.2% | +80.6% | +71.8% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 73.3 | 45.2 | 70.7 | 66.2 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 239K | 197K | 422K | 886K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MAN and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KFRC as "Hold", ASTE as "Buy", KELYA as "Buy", MAN as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.0% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs -29.9% for ASTE (target: $36). For income investors, MAN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.21% vs ASTE's 1.00%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $71.00 | $36.00 | $15.00 | $37.86 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 12 | 5 | 29 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +3.1% | +1.0% | +2.6% | +4.2% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | $1.55 | $0.51 | $0.31 | $1.43 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | +5.6% | 0.0% | +2.9% | +2.4% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). KFRC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
EML vs KFRC vs ASTE vs KELYA vs MAN vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA or MAN or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is the stronger pick with 8. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 7% for The Eastern Company (EML). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA or MAN or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Astec Industries, Inc. at 30. 6x. On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA or MAN or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -62. 5% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus MAN's -24. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA or MAN or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Astec Industries, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning ASTE is approximately 475% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA or MAN or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is pulling ahead at 8. 1% versus -8. 7% for The Eastern Company (EML). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astec Industries, Inc. grew EPS 784. 2% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTE leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA or MAN or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA or MAN or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for Kforce Inc. — 11. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 42. 0% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA or MAN or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 0% for Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE).
09Is EML or KFRC or ASTE or KELYA or MAN or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 3. 1% yield, +226. 5% 10Y return). Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +226. 5%, ASTE: +3. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EML and KFRC and ASTE and KELYA and MAN and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (EML (Industrials) and KFRC (Industrials) and ASTE (Industrials) and KELYA (Industrials) and MAN (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EML is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ASTE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KELYA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.