Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FCCO vs SFST vs GSBC vs CHMG vs CZWI vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
FCCO vs SFST vs GSBC vs CHMG vs CZWI vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $247M | $574M | $865M | $349M | $207M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $111M | $225M | $344M | $140M | $90M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $30M | $71M | $15M | $14M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 68.1% | 51.3% | 67.0% | 64.2% | 54.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 22.7% | 17.6% | 25.4% | 14.2% | 7.0% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 11.8x | 13.3x | 10.1x | 11.8x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $125M | $265M | $405M | $5M | $52M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $28M | $98M | $23M | $119M | $343.34B |
FCCO vs SFST vs GSBC vs CHMG vs CZWI vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Community Cor… (FCCO) | 100 | 212.7 | +112.7% |
| Southern First Banc… (SFST) | 100 | 219.0 | +119.0% |
| Great Southern Banc… (GSBC) | 100 | 188.0 | +88.0% |
| Chemung Financial C… (CHMG) | 100 | 265.6 | +165.6% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FCCO vs SFST vs GSBC vs CHMG vs CZWI vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FCCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth 12.7%, EPS growth 36.5%
- 12.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
SFST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CHMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +64.6% vs JPM's +21.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CHMG's 0.5%
GSBC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive and bank quality.
- Beta 0.73, yield 2.2%, current ratio 2.54x
- NIM 3.6% vs JPM's 2.2%
- 2.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
CHMG is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.1x vs 13.3x)
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs CHMG's 175.6%
- PEG 0.81 vs CZWI's 2.32
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 13.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CHMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.6% vs JPM's +21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CHMG's 0.5% |
FCCO vs SFST vs GSBC vs CHMG vs CZWI vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FCCO vs SFST vs GSBC vs CHMG vs CZWI vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
FCCO leads 0 • SFST leads 0 • GSBC leads 0 • CHMG leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3112.4x CZWI's $90M. GSBC is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHMG's 10.8%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $111M | $225M | $344M | $140M | $90M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $44M | $94M | $23M | $9M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $30M | $71M | $15M | $14M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $18M | $30M | $66M | $44M | $11M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.1% | +51.3% | +67.0% | +64.2% | +54.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +17.6% | +25.4% | +14.2% | +7.0% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +13.5% | +20.6% | +10.8% | +16.0% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +13.3% | +19.3% | +31.4% | +12.4% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.7% | +72.9% | +12.6% | +29.8% | +63.0% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FCCO and CHMG each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, GSBC trades at a 47% valuation discount to CHMG's 23.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $247M | $574M | $865M | $349M | $207M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $348M | $811M | $1.2B | $331M | $140M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.04x | 16.18x | 12.26x | 23.16x | 14.70x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.99x | 11.81x | 13.32x | 10.14x | 11.79x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.02x | 1.64x | 1.53x | — | 2.90x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.25x | 18.29x | 13.42x | 14.64x | 15.69x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.22x | 2.55x | 2.52x | 2.49x | 2.29x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 1.33x | 1.36x | 1.37x | 1.11x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.04x | 19.20x | 13.05x | 7.90x | 19.90x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $6 for CHMG. CHMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SFST scores 8/9 vs CHMG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | +8.6% | +11.3% | +6.3% | +7.8% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.7% | +1.2% | +0.5% | +0.8% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +4.8% | +7.2% | +5.0% | +2.0% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +5.9% | +2.7% | +5.6% | +0.6% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.74x | 0.72x | 0.64x | 0.02x | 0.28x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $101M | $237M | $307M | -$18M | -$67M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $28M | $98M | $23M | $119M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $125M | $265M | $405M | $5M | $52M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.97x | 0.37x | 0.77x | 0.44x | 0.16x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CZWI and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,737 for SFST. Over the past 12 months, SFST leads with a +64.6% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs GSBC's 14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.3% | +17.4% | +24.4% | +33.7% | +24.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.5% | +64.6% | +35.0% | +52.6% | +52.1% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.9% | +130.5% | +50.9% | +93.3% | +153.7% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.2% | +17.4% | +50.7% | +86.5% | +69.0% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +171.1% | +142.5% | +130.6% | +175.6% | +149.0% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.2% | +32.1% | +14.7% | +24.6% | +36.4% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FCCO and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCCO currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.83x | 0.73x | 0.55x | 0.50x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.45 | $62.38 | $76.92 | $73.84 | $22.62 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.80 | $34.80 | $53.76 | $43.20 | $12.83 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +97.3% | +98.6% | +98.2% | +94.9% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.1 | 69.5 | 70.1 | 68.8 | 51.2 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 87K | 135K | 95K | 32K | 41K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GSBC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FCCO as "Buy", SFST as "Hold", GSBC as "Hold", CHMG as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -31.0% for CHMG (target: $50). For income investors, GSBC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.17% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.00 | $64.00 | $62.00 | $50.00 | — | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | — | +2.2% | +1.8% | +1.7% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | — | $1.64 | $1.31 | $0.37 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.1% | +0.1% | +3.0% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
FCCO vs SFST vs GSBC vs CHMG vs CZWI vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FCCO or SFST or GSBC or CHMG or CZWI or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Community Corporation (FCCO) is the stronger pick with 12.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. (GSBC) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Community Corporation (FCCO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FCCO or SFST or GSBC or CHMG or CZWI or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Great Southern Bancorp, Inc.
(GSBC) is the cheapest at 12. 3x versus Chemung Financial Corporation at 23. 2x. On forward P/E, Chemung Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FCCO or SFST or GSBC or CHMG or CZWI or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +17. 4% for Southern First Bancshares, Inc. (SFST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus GSBC's +130. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FCCO or SFST or GSBC or CHMG or CZWI or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 90% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FCCO or SFST or GSBC or CHMG or CZWI or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Community Corporation (FCCO) is pulling ahead at 12.
7% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern First Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 96. 3% year-over-year, compared to -36. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FCCO or SFST or GSBC or CHMG or CZWI or JPM?
Great Southern Bancorp, Inc.
(GSBC) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 7% net margin versus 10. 8% for Chemung Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCCO leads at 68. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FCCO or SFST or GSBC or CHMG or CZWI or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 4. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — FCCO or SFST or GSBC or CHMG or CZWI or JPM?
In this comparison, GSBC (2.
2% yield), FCCO (1. 9% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), CHMG (1. 8% yield), CZWI (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SFST does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FCCO or SFST or GSBC or CHMG or CZWI or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 7% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +149. 0%, SFST: +142. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FCCO and SFST and GSBC and CHMG and CZWI and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FCCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFST is a small-cap deep-value stock; GSBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. FCCO, GSBC, CHMG, CZWI, JPM pay a dividend while SFST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.