Consulting Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FGO vs HIHO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Banks - Diversified
FGO vs HIHO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consulting Services | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | — | $3M | $869.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21M | $6M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-535K | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 78.5% | 29.4% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 37.6% | -21.6% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.0x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $810K | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $6M | $343.34B |
FGO vs HIHO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highway Holdings Li… (HIHO) | 100 | 32.6 | -67.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 330.8 | +230.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FGO vs HIHO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FGO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 40.0%, EPS growth 15.8%
- 40.0% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
- 33.2% margin vs HIHO's -8.7%
HIHO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 15.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 12.9%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.46, yield 15.4%, current ratio 2.79x
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 433.9% 10Y total return vs HIHO's -44.0%
- Lower P/E (14.0x vs 30.0x)
- +18.8% vs HIHO's -60.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.0% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 30.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.2% margin vs HIHO's -8.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs JPM's 0.95, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 15.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.8% vs HIHO's -60.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.4% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 95.7% vs -31.7% |
FGO vs HIHO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FGO vs HIHO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FGO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 45634.5x HIHO's $6M. FGO is the more profitable business, keeping 33.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIHO's -8.7%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21M | $6M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$653,000 | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$535,000 | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $0 | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.5% | +29.4% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | -21.6% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | -8.7% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | -6.2% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -44.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.5% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FGO and HIHO each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 48% valuation discount to HIHO's 30.0x P/E.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $3M | $869.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | -$2M | $1.47T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | 30.05x | 15.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 13.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | -26.68x | 18.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.43x | 3.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.51x | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FGO leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FGO delivers a 65.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $66 in annual profit, vs $-9 for HIHO. HIHO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FGO scores 6/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +65.5% | -9.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +34.4% | -6.4% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +95.7% | -31.7% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +73.8% | -7.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.13x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | -$5M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $6M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $810,000 | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,255 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,758 for HIHO. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +18.8% total return vs HIHO's -60.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.4% vs HIHO's -24.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -47.1% | -3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | — | -60.6% | +18.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -56.6% | +131.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -62.4% | +102.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -44.0% | +433.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -24.3% | +32.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HIHO and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HIHO is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs HIHO's 32.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 0.46x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.00 | $2.21 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $0.61 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | — | +32.8% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | — | 47.7 | 59.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 88K | 7.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HIHO and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, HIHO offers the higher dividend yield at 15.43% vs JPM's 1.91%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +15.4% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.11 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | 0.0% | +4.0% |
FGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
FGO vs HIHO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FGO or HIHO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the stronger pick with 40.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FGO or HIHO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Highway Holdings Limited at 30. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FGO or HIHO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +102. 6%, compared to -62. 4% for Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +433. 9% versus HIHO's -44. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FGO or HIHO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
46β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 95β — meaning JPM is approximately 106% more volatile than HIHO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FGO or HIHO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is pulling ahead at 40.
0% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Highway Holdings Limited grew EPS 111. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FGO or HIHO or JPM?
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the more profitable company, earning 33.
2% net margin versus 1. 4% for Highway Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FGO leads at 37. 6% versus -7. 2% for HIHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FGO leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — FGO or HIHO or JPM?
In this comparison, HIHO (15.
4% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. FGO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FGO or HIHO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
46), 15. 4% yield). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FGO and HIHO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (FGO (Industrials) and HIHO (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIHO is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. HIHO, JPM pay a dividend while FGO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.