Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FGO logo
FGO
ITIC logo
ITIC
KFRC logo
KFRC
FNF logo
FNF
KELYA logo
KELYA
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FGO vs ITIC vs KFRC vs FNF vs KELYA vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FGO
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares

Consulting Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap
5Y Perf.
ITIC
Investors Title Company

Insurance - Specialty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$459M
5Y Perf.+100.6%
KFRC
Kforce Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$875M
5Y Perf.+63.7%
FNF
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.

Insurance - Specialty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.66B
5Y Perf.+59.7%
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$412M
5Y Perf.-24.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$869.15B
5Y Perf.+230.8%

FGO vs ITIC vs KFRC vs FNF vs KELYA vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FGO logoFGO
ITIC logoITIC
KFRC logoKFRC
FNF logoFNF
KELYA logoKELYA
JPM logoJPM
IndustryConsulting ServicesInsurance - SpecialtyStaffing & Employment ServicesInsurance - SpecialtyStaffing & Employment ServicesBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$459M$875M$12.66B$412M$869.15B
Revenue (TTM)$21M$280M$1.33B$14.81B$4.13B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$7M$38M$35M$762M$-266M$57.05B
Gross Margin78.5%99.0%27.2%74.2%19.5%60.0%
Operating Margin37.6%17.2%3.8%12.0%-1.9%25.9%
Forward P/E40.0x19.9x8.9x13.2x14.0x
Total Debt$8M$8M$70M$4.77B$159M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$16M$21M$2M$2.38B$33M$343.34B

FGO vs ITIC vs KFRC vs FNF vs KELYA vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FGO
ITIC
KFRC
FNF
KELYA
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Investors Title Com… (ITIC)100200.6+100.6%
Kforce Inc. (KFRC)100163.7+63.7%
Fidelity National F… (FNF)100159.7+59.7%
Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA)10075.1-24.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100330.8+230.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FGO vs ITIC vs KFRC vs FNF vs KELYA vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FGO leads in 3 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Investors Title Company is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. KFRC and FNF also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FGO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
FGO
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares
The Growth Play

FGO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 40.0%, EPS growth 15.8%
  • 40.0% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
  • 33.2% margin vs KELYA's -6.4%
  • 34.4% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 95.7% vs -4.0%
Best for: growth exposure
ITIC
Investors Title Company
The Insurance Pick

ITIC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 2.93x
  • Beta 0.60, yield 4.3%, current ratio 2.93x
  • 4.3% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
  • +29.3% vs FNF's -10.6%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
KFRC
Kforce Inc.
The Defensive Choice

KFRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 0.30 vs JPM's 0.95, lower leverage
Best for: stability
FNF
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

FNF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 4.3%
  • Lower P/E (8.9x vs 14.0x)
Best for: income & stability
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.
The Income Angle

Among these 6 stocks, KELYA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 433.9% 10Y total return vs ITIC's 271.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFGO logoFGO40.0% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
ValueFNF logoFNFLower P/E (8.9x vs 14.0x)
Quality / MarginsFGO logoFGO33.2% margin vs KELYA's -6.4%
Stability / SafetyKFRC logoKFRCBeta 0.30 vs JPM's 0.95, lower leverage
DividendsITIC logoITIC4.3% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ITIC logoITIC+29.3% vs FNF's -10.6%
Efficiency (ROA)FGO logoFGO34.4% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 95.7% vs -4.0%

FGO vs ITIC vs KFRC vs FNF vs KELYA vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FGOFG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

ITICInvestors Title Company
FY 2025
Net Premiums Written
78.0%$213M
Non-Title Services
7.9%$22M
Escrow, Title-Related And Other Fees
7.1%$19M
Investment Related Revenue
5.8%$16M
Other Resources, Miscellaneous
1.2%$3M
KFRCKforce Inc.
FY 2025
Flex Revenue
98.1%$1.3B
Direct Hire Revenue
1.9%$26M
FNFFidelity National Financial, Inc.
FY 2025
Title Segment
74.6%$8.9B
F&G Segment
24.3%$2.9B
Corporate And Reconciling Items
1.1%$135M
KELYAKelly Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Science, Engineering & Technology
55.1%$1.2B
Education
44.9%$1.0B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

FGO vs ITIC vs KFRC vs FNF vs KELYA vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFNFLAGGINGKELYA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FNF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 13187.8x FGO's $21M. FGO is the more profitable business, keeping 33.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -6.4%. On growth, FNF holds the edge at +20.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…ITIC logoITICInvestors Title C…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.FNF logoFNFFidelity National…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$21M$280M$1.3B$14.8B$4.1B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$52M$56M$2.6B-$35M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$38M$35M$762M-$266M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$27M$43M$5.8B$66M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+78.5%+99.0%+27.2%+74.2%+19.5%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+37.6%+17.2%+3.8%+12.0%-1.9%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+33.2%+13.6%+2.6%+5.1%-6.4%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.8%+9.8%+3.3%+39.3%+1.6%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.2%+0.1%+20.6%-10.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+91.6%+2.2%+2.0%-2.1%+16.0%
FNF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FNF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 13.1x trailing earnings, ITIC trades at a 46% valuation discount to KFRC's 24.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FNF's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.0x.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…ITIC logoITICInvestors Title C…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.FNF logoFNFFidelity National…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$459M$875M$12.7B$412M$869.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$447M$943M$15.1B$538M$1.47T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS0.00x13.10x24.43x21.29x-1.64x15.52x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.39.99x19.90x8.90x13.16x13.97x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.19x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.12x16.95x6.62x18.03x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.68x0.66x0.87x0.10x3.11x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.00x1.72x6.83x1.43x0.43x2.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.10x18.70x1.99x3.61x8.62x
FNF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FGO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FGO delivers a 65.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $66 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. ITIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FNF scores 7/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…ITIC logoITICInvestors Title C…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.FNF logoFNFFidelity National…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+65.5%+14.0%+27.2%+8.5%-24.6%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+34.4%+10.6%+9.2%+0.7%-11.3%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+95.7%+13.7%+19.1%+10.1%-4.0%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+73.8%+15.0%+20.1%+1.8%-4.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9654755
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.54x0.03x0.56x0.53x0.16x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$9M-$13M$68M$2.4B$126M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$16M$21M$2M$2.4B$33M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$8M$8M$70M$4.8B$159M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense8.33x-8.78x0.74x
FGO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,255 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,218 for KELYA. Over the past 12 months, ITIC leads with a +29.3% total return vs FNF's -10.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.4% vs KELYA's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…ITIC logoITICInvestors Title C…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.FNF logoFNFFidelity National…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-1.1%+54.1%-12.4%+39.2%-3.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+29.3%+19.1%-10.6%+1.0%+18.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+98.6%-15.8%+49.5%-31.4%+131.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+70.1%-14.1%+22.4%-47.8%+102.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+271.4%+197.0%+143.7%-27.3%+433.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+25.7%-5.6%+14.3%-11.8%+32.4%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs FNF's 76.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…ITIC logoITICInvestors Title C…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.FNF logoFNFFidelity National…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.60x0.30x0.50x0.93x0.95x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.00$288.98$48.81$61.40$14.94$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.00$193.03$24.49$42.78$7.98$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+84.2%+98.1%+76.6%+79.5%+92.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.368.045.369.959.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded026K242K1.5M428K7.1M
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ITIC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: KFRC as "Hold", FNF as "Buy", KELYA as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 8.9% for JPM (target: $339). For income investors, ITIC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.32% vs JPM's 1.91%.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…ITIC logoITICInvestors Title C…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.FNF logoFNFFidelity National…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$71.00$54.00$15.00$338.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts1017561
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.3%+3.2%+4.3%+2.6%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0814015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$10.52$1.55$2.01$0.31$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+5.8%+2.3%+3.0%+4.0%
Evenly matched — ITIC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FNF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FGO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallFidelity National Financial… (FNF)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FGO vs ITIC vs KFRC vs FNF vs KELYA vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FGO or ITIC or KFRC or FNF or KELYA or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the stronger pick with 40.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Investors Title Company (ITIC) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (40. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FGO or ITIC or KFRC or FNF or KELYA or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Investors Title Company (ITIC) is the cheapest at 13.

1x versus Kforce Inc. at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Financial, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FGO or ITIC or KFRC or FNF or KELYA or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +102. 6%, compared to -47. 8% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +433. 9% versus KELYA's -27. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FGO or ITIC or KFRC or FNF or KELYA or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.

(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 95β — meaning JPM is approximately 213% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Investors Title Company (ITIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FGO or ITIC or KFRC or FNF or KELYA or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is pulling ahead at 40.

0% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares grew EPS 15. 8% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FNF leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FGO or ITIC or KFRC or FNF or KELYA or JPM?

FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the more profitable company, earning 33.

2% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FGO leads at 37. 6% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ITIC leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FGO or ITIC or KFRC or FNF or KELYA or JPM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Financial, Inc.

(FNF) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for Investors Title Company — 31. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 48. 3% to $71. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FGO or ITIC or KFRC or FNF or KELYA or JPM?

In this comparison, ITIC (4.

3% yield), FNF (4. 3% yield), KFRC (3. 2% yield), KELYA (2. 6% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. FGO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FGO or ITIC or KFRC or FNF or KELYA or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.

(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30), 3. 2% yield, +197. 0% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FGO and ITIC and KFRC and FNF and KELYA and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (FGO (Industrials) and ITIC (Financial Services) and KFRC (Industrials) and FNF (Financial Services) and KELYA (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ITIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FNF is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; KELYA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. ITIC, KFRC, FNF, KELYA, JPM pay a dividend while FGO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.