Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
GOSS logo
GOSS
MNKD logo
MNKD
UTHR logo
UTHR
NKTR logo
NKTR
IQV logo
IQV
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GOSS vs MNKD vs UTHR vs NKTR vs IQV vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GOSS
Gossamer Bio, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$38M
5Y Perf.-98.8%
MNKD
MannKind Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.13B
5Y Perf.+109.1%
UTHR
United Therapeutics Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.17B
5Y Perf.+351.2%
NKTR
Nektar Therapeutics

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.16B
5Y Perf.-82.9%
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$30.79B
5Y Perf.+27.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

GOSS vs MNKD vs UTHR vs NKTR vs IQV vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GOSS logoGOSS
MNKD logoMNKD
UTHR logoUTHR
NKTR logoNKTR
IQV logoIQV
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$38M$1.13B$23.17B$1.16B$30.79B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$56M$361M$3.17B$56M$16.63B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-180M$-24M$1.29B$-158M$1.39B$57.05B
Gross Margin99.6%76.0%86.6%99.4%26.1%60.0%
Operating Margin-321.9%3.7%45.3%-224.9%13.9%25.9%
Forward P/E183.0x19.2x14.2x14.4x
Total Debt$202M$473M$0.00$149M$16.17B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$38M$75M$1.56B$15M$1.98B$343.34B

GOSS vs MNKD vs UTHR vs NKTR vs IQV vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GOSS
MNKD
UTHR
NKTR
IQV
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS)1001.2-98.8%
MannKind Corporation (MNKD)100209.1+109.1%
United Therapeutics… (UTHR)100451.2+351.2%
Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR)10017.1-82.9%
IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)100127.9+27.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GOSS vs MNKD vs UTHR vs NKTR vs IQV vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: UTHR leads in 3 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. MannKind Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. NKTR, IQV, and JPM also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇UTHR emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
GOSS
Gossamer Bio, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

GOSS doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
MNKD
MannKind Corporation
The Growth Leader

MNKD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 22.2% revenue growth vs GOSS's -57.7%
Best for: growth
UTHR
United Therapeutics Corporation
The Growth Play

UTHR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 10.6%, EPS growth 13.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.14, current ratio 6.60x
  • Beta 0.14, current ratio 6.60x
  • 40.6% margin vs GOSS's -324.8%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
NKTR
Nektar Therapeutics
The Momentum Pick

NKTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +5.8% vs GOSS's -87.3%
Best for: momentum
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
The Value Pick

IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.35 vs UTHR's 1.00
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: valuation efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs UTHR's 396.1%
  • 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMNKD logoMNKD22.2% revenue growth vs GOSS's -57.7%
ValueIQV logoIQVBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsUTHR logoUTHR40.6% margin vs GOSS's -324.8%
Stability / SafetyUTHR logoUTHRBeta 0.14 vs GOSS's 2.45
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NKTR logoNKTR+5.8% vs GOSS's -87.3%
Efficiency (ROA)UTHR logoUTHR17.2% ROA vs GOSS's -96.1%, ROIC 21.5% vs -107.5%

GOSS vs MNKD vs UTHR vs NKTR vs IQV vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
0.0%$0
MNKDMannKind Corporation
FY 2025
Product Revenue
62.0%$217M
Royalty
36.7%$128M
Service
1.2%$4M
UTHRUnited Therapeutics Corporation
FY 2025
Tyvaso
59.0%$1.9B
Remodulin
16.6%$527M
Orenitram
15.6%$497M
Unituxin
7.1%$227M
Adcirca
0.9%$30M
Product and Service, Other
0.8%$24M
NKTRNektar Therapeutics
FY 2025
Non Cash Royalty Revenue Related To Sale Of Future Royalties
99.5%$55M
License Collaboration And Other Revenue
0.5%$300,000
IQVIQVIA Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Research And Development Solutions
54.5%$8.9B
Technology And Analytics Solutions
40.6%$6.6B
Contract Sales And Medical Solutions
4.8%$788M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

GOSS vs MNKD vs UTHR vs NKTR vs IQV vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUTHRLAGGINGMNKD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — GOSS and UTHR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 5047.7x GOSS's $56M. UTHR is the more profitable business, keeping 40.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GOSS's -3.2%. On growth, GOSS holds the edge at +71.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$56M$361M$3.2B$56M$16.6B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$178M$30M$1.5B-$124M$3.5B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$180M-$24M$1.3B-$158M$1.4B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$170M$13M$1.0B-$204M$2.7B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+99.6%+76.0%+86.6%+99.4%+26.1%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.2%+3.7%+45.3%-2.2%+13.9%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.2%-6.6%+40.6%-2.8%+8.3%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.1%+3.5%+32.1%-3.7%+16.1%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+71.5%+15.1%-1.6%+3.8%+8.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-25.0%-2.3%-12.2%+49.7%+15.0%+16.0%
Evenly matched — GOSS and UTHR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 91% valuation discount to MNKD's 183.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.57x vs UTHR's 1.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$38M$1.1B$23.2B$1.2B$30.8B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$202M$1.5B$21.6B$1.3B$45.0B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.22x183.00x19.60x-6.10x23.15x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.21x14.16x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.02x0.57x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple29.94x13.49x13.11x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.78x3.24x7.28x21.01x1.89x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.69x11.15x4.75x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF82.60x22.27x15.01x8.88x
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

UTHR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-87 for NKTR. NKTR carries lower financial leverage with a 1.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UTHR scores 7/9 vs GOSS's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+19.2%-87.0%+22.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-96.1%-3.9%+17.2%-40.7%+4.7%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-107.5%+21.6%+21.5%-57.2%+8.7%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-86.1%+8.3%+21.8%-55.7%+11.0%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9047245
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.66x2.44x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$164M$399M-$1.6B$134M$14.2B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$38M$75M$1.6B$15M$2.0B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$202M$473M$0$149M$16.2B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-15.50x0.29x99.37x-4.15x3.10x0.74x
UTHR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in UTHR five years ago would be worth $30,390 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $184 for GOSS. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +577.9% total return vs GOSS's -87.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 90.8% vs GOSS's -48.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-94.4%-34.6%+9.9%+36.8%-19.5%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-87.3%-4.4%+90.8%+577.9%+14.0%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.9%-11.6%+139.6%+594.5%-14.4%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.2%-11.4%+203.9%-77.6%-25.8%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.1%-28.9%+396.1%-73.6%+177.5%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-48.0%-4.0%+33.8%+90.8%-5.0%+33.6%
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — UTHR and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

UTHR is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOSS's 2.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs GOSS's 4.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.45x1.10x0.14x1.50x1.16x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.87$6.51$609.35$109.00$247.05$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.14$2.23$272.12$7.99$153.01$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+4.2%+56.2%+89.6%+54.5%+73.5%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10034.163.742.232.154.459.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded10.7M5.3M400K994K1.5M7.0M
Evenly matched — UTHR and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: GOSS as "Buy", MNKD as "Buy", UTHR as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 373.6% upside for GOSS (target: $1) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricGOSS logoGOSSGossamer Bio, Inc.MNKD logoMNKDMannKind Corporat…UTHR logoUTHRUnited Therapeuti…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$0.77$8.50$636.83$149.60$222.22$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts171930334461
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1215
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+4.3%0.0%+4.0%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

IQV leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). UTHR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallUnited Therapeutics Corpora… (UTHR)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GOSS vs MNKD vs UTHR vs NKTR vs IQV vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is the stronger pick with 22.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -57. 7% for Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus MannKind Corporation at 183. 0x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus United Therapeutics Corporation's 1. 00x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) delivered a total return of +203.

9%, compared to -98. 2% for Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus GOSS's -99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

14β versus Gossamer Bio, Inc. 's 2. 45β — meaning GOSS is approximately 1707% more volatile than UTHR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 166% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is pulling ahead at 22.

2% versus -57. 7% for Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Therapeutics Corporation grew EPS 13. 1% year-over-year, compared to -200. 0% for Gossamer Bio, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNKD leads at 51. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV or JPM?

United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the more profitable company, earning 41.

9% net margin versus -351. 5% for Gossamer Bio, Inc. — meaning it keeps 41. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UTHR leads at 47. 7% versus -336. 8% for GOSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus United Therapeutics Corporation's 1. 00x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 19. 2x for United Therapeutics Corporation — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GOSS: 373. 6% to $0. 77.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. GOSS, MNKD, UTHR, NKTR, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GOSS or MNKD or UTHR or NKTR or IQV or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

14), +396. 1% 10Y return). Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS) carries a higher beta of 2. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UTHR: +396. 1%, GOSS: -99. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GOSS and MNKD and UTHR and NKTR and IQV and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (GOSS (Healthcare) and MNKD (Healthcare) and UTHR (Healthcare) and NKTR (Healthcare) and IQV (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GOSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNKD is a small-cap high-growth stock; UTHR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while GOSS, MNKD, UTHR, NKTR, IQV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.