Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
HEPS logo
HEPS
SE logo
SE
MELI logo
MELI
BABA logo
BABA
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HEPS vs SE vs MELI vs BABA vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HEPS
D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • TR
Market Cap$888M
5Y Perf.-78.7%
SE
Sea Limited

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • SG
Market Cap$50.80B
5Y Perf.-70.0%
MELI
MercadoLibre, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • UY
Market Cap$80.59B
5Y Perf.+1.3%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$263.29B
5Y Perf.-42.2%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+111.3%

HEPS vs SE vs MELI vs BABA vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HEPS logoHEPS
SE logoSE
MELI logoMELI
BABA logoBABA
JPM logoJPM
IndustrySpecialty RetailSpecialty RetailSpecialty RetailSpecialty RetailBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$888M$50.80B$80.59B$263.29B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$79.46B$22.94B$31.80B$1.02T$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-5.53B$1.59B$1.92B$103.59B$57.05B
Gross Margin31.9%44.7%43.9%39.8%60.0%
Operating Margin-2.4%8.5%9.6%5.8%25.9%
Forward P/E23.6x40.2x2.6x14.4x
Total Debt$3.20B$3.33B$11.39B$259.02B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$11.51B$6.38B$3.67B$172.92B$343.34B

HEPS vs SE vs MELI vs BABA vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HEPS
SE
MELI
BABA
JPM
StockJul 21Jun 26Return
D-Market Elektronik… (HEPS)10021.3-78.7%
Sea Limited (SE)10030.0-70.0%
MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI)100101.3+1.3%
Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA)10057.8-42.2%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100211.3+111.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HEPS vs SE vs MELI vs BABA vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. SE and BABA also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
HEPS
D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S.
The Defensive Pick

HEPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.90, current ratio 0.89x
  • 61.0% revenue growth vs BABA's 2.7%
  • Beta 0.90 vs SE's 1.58
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
SE
Sea Limited
The Niche Pick

SE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.

  • 6.0% ROA vs HEPS's -17.7%
Best for: efficiency
MELI
MercadoLibre, Inc.
The Growth Play

MELI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 39.1%, EPS growth 4.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.9%
  • 10.9% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
The Value Play

BABA is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (2.6x vs 14.4x)
Best for: value
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
  • 20.4% margin vs HEPS's -7.0%
  • 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BABA's 1.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHEPS logoHEPS61.0% revenue growth vs BABA's 2.7%
ValueBABA logoBABALower P/E (2.6x vs 14.4x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs HEPS's -7.0%
Stability / SafetyHEPS logoHEPSBeta 0.90 vs SE's 1.58
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BABA's 1.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)JPM logoJPM+21.8% vs SE's -46.4%
Efficiency (ROA)SE logoSE6.0% ROA vs HEPS's -17.7%

HEPS vs SE vs MELI vs BABA vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
HEPSD-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S.
FY 2025
Sales of goods
64.6%$57.1B
Delivery service revenues
14.0%$12.4B
Marketplace revenues
11.2%$9.9B
Other
6.0%$5.3B
Advertising
2.4%$2.1B
Subscription service
1.9%$1.7B
SESea Limited
FY 2025
Third Party Customers
54.9%$787M
Inter-companies
45.1%$647M
MELIMercadoLibre, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
87.5%$25.3B
Product
12.5%$3.6B
BABAAlibaba Group Holding Limited
FY 2026
Customer Management Services
44.9%$459.9B
Sales Of Goods
22.2%$227.7B
Logistics Services
13.7%$139.9B
Cloud Services
10.9%$112.1B
Membership Fees and Value Added Services
4.7%$47.6B
Product and Service, Other
3.6%$36.4B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

HEPS vs SE vs MELI vs BABA vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGMELI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.02T annually — 44.6x SE's $22.9B. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HEPS's -7.0%. On growth, MELI holds the edge at +49.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…SE logoSESea LimitedMELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$79.5B$22.9B$31.8B$1.02T$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.2B$2.1B$3.9B$64.7B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$5.5B$1.6B$1.9B$103.6B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$4.1B$3.2B$10.7B-$50.5B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+31.9%+44.7%+43.9%+39.8%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.4%+8.5%+9.6%+5.8%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.0%+6.9%+6.0%+10.1%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.1%+13.9%+33.7%-4.9%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.0%+38.4%+49.0%+2.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.8%+61.5%-15.5%+100.0%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BABA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 60% valuation discount to MELI's 40.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BABA's 17.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HEPS's 26.5x.

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…SE logoSESea LimitedMELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$888M$50.8B$80.6B$263.3B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$709M$47.8B$88.3B$276.0B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-6.70x32.91x40.36x17.34x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.23.57x40.22x2.57x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.47x25.62x23.41x17.48x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.45x2.21x2.79x1.74x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share20.40x4.19x11.94x1.63x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.79x11.25x7.48x8.88x
BABA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — SE and MELI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

MELI delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HEPS. BABA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SE scores 8/9 vs BABA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…SE logoSESea LimitedMELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.4%+15.2%+29.6%+9.3%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-17.7%+6.0%+4.8%+5.5%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+14.1%+20.8%+3.8%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-54.3%+14.3%+28.3%+4.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–948545
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.59x0.26x1.69x0.23x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$8.3B-$3.0B$7.7B$86.1B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$11.5B$6.4B$3.7B$172.9B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.2B$3.3B$11.4B$259.0B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.33x60.40x14.14x14.21x0.74x
Evenly matched — SE and MELI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,085 for HEPS. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs SE's -46.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs SE's 8.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…SE logoSESea LimitedMELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.4%-36.9%-19.5%-26.9%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-1.1%-46.4%-32.9%-0.6%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+133.3%+27.5%+28.4%+38.0%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.2%-70.1%+11.0%-44.6%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.2%+417.8%+1092.7%+57.1%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+32.6%+8.4%+8.7%+11.3%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HEPS and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HEPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SE's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs SE's 41.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…SE logoSESea LimitedMELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.90x1.58x1.22x1.29x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.33$199.30$2645.22$192.67$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.15$77.05$1495.00$103.71$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+84.1%+41.6%+60.1%+58.6%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.846.343.329.459.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded301K3.9M538K10.2M7.0M
Evenly matched — HEPS and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: HEPS as "Hold", SE as "Buy", MELI as "Buy", BABA as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 68.4% upside for SE (target: $140) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs BABA's 1.84%.

MetricHEPS logoHEPSD-Market Elektron…SE logoSESea LimitedMELI logoMELIMercadoLibre, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$139.67$2166.67$189.17$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts244335961
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.8%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises90115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$14.03$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.0%+0.0%+0.4%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BABA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HEPS vs SE vs MELI vs BABA vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.

S. (HEPS) is the stronger pick with 61. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sea Limited (SE) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus MercadoLibre, Inc. at 40. 4x. On forward P/E, Alibaba Group Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 2. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -79. 2% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S. (HEPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MELI returned +1093% versus HEPS's -79. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.

S. (HEPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Sea Limited's 1. 58β — meaning SE is approximately 75% more volatile than HEPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.

S. (HEPS) is pulling ahead at 61. 0% versus 2. 7% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sea Limited grew EPS 245. 2% year-over-year, compared to -286. 4% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MELI leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -6. 7% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -2. 4% for HEPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA or JPM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) trades at 2.

6x forward P/E versus 40. 2x for MercadoLibre, Inc. — 37. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SE: 68. 4% to $139. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield), BABA (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. HEPS, SE, MELI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is HEPS or SE or MELI or BABA or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Sea Limited (SE) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, SE: +417. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HEPS and SE and MELI and BABA and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (HEPS (Consumer Cyclical) and SE (Consumer Cyclical) and MELI (Consumer Cyclical) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HEPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MELI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. BABA, JPM pay a dividend while HEPS, SE, MELI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.