Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
HWBK vs MOFG vs FBIZ vs CZWI vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
HWBK vs MOFG vs FBIZ vs CZWI vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $260M | $1.02B | $506M | $207M | $896.00B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $351M | $274M | $90M | $280.33B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $58M | $51M | $14M | $57.05B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 71.3% | 63.2% | 44.4% | 54.7% | 60.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 26.0% | 21.3% | 17.1% | 7.0% | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 13.8x | 9.7x | 11.8x | 14.4x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $155M | $117M | $259M | $52M | $942.38B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $105M | $205M | $31M | $119M | $343.34B | $10.27B |
HWBK vs MOFG vs FBIZ vs CZWI vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawthorn Bancshares… (HWBK) | 100 | 215.4 | +115.4% |
| MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG) | 100 | 231.6 | +131.6% |
| First Business Fina… (FBIZ) | 100 | 368.5 | +268.5% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HWBK vs MOFG vs FBIZ vs CZWI vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HWBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.1%
- Beta 0.35, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.11x
- NIM 3.5% vs JPM's 2.2%
- Beta 0.35 vs MOFG's 1.34
MOFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +71.2% vs KO's +17.2%
FBIZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 16.5%
- PEG 0.39 vs CZWI's 2.32
- 6.4% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1%
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.39 vs 2.26
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs FBIZ's 186.7%
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 27.8% margin vs CZWI's 16.0%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs FBIZ's 2.0%
- 13.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.39 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs CZWI's 16.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs MOFG's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs FBIZ's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +71.2% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.0% |
HWBK vs MOFG vs FBIZ vs CZWI vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HWBK vs MOFG vs FBIZ vs CZWI vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
FBIZ leads 1 • HWBK leads 0 • MOFG leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3112.4x CZWI's $90M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $351M | $274M | $90M | $280.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31M | $74M | $49M | $9M | $81.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $58M | $51M | $14M | $57.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | $79M | $53M | $11M | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.3% | +63.2% | +44.4% | +54.7% | +60.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +21.3% | +17.1% | +7.0% | +25.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +16.7% | +18.7% | +16.0% | +20.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +22.5% | +19.3% | +12.4% | +36.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +113.6% | +12.9% | +63.0% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FBIZ leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, FBIZ trades at a 63% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBIZ offers better value at 0.40x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $260M | $1.0B | $506M | $207M | $896.0B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $310M | $929M | $734M | $140M | $1.50T | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.99x | -13.93x | 10.00x | 14.70x | 16.00x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.77x | 9.75x | 11.79x | 14.40x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.93x | — | 0.40x | 2.90x | 0.90x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.89x | — | 12.15x | 15.69x | 18.36x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.32x | 4.94x | 1.81x | 2.29x | 3.20x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.51x | 1.50x | 1.33x | 1.11x | 2.47x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.37x | 16.74x | 8.28x | 19.90x | 8.88x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. MOFG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBIZ scores 8/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.7% | +10.0% | +14.1% | +7.8% | +15.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +0.9% | +1.2% | +0.8% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | -9.4% | +7.0% | +2.0% | +4.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | -9.5% | +2.6% | +0.6% | +8.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.89x | 0.21x | 0.70x | 0.28x | 2.60x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $50M | -$88M | $229M | -$67M | $599.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $105M | $205M | $31M | $119M | $343.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $155M | $117M | $259M | $52M | $942.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.92x | 0.67x | 0.42x | 0.16x | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MOFG and CZWI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBIZ five years ago would be worth $24,159 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,560 for KO. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +71.2% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | +30.2% | +14.4% | +24.3% | -0.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.8% | +71.2% | +26.5% | +52.1% | +21.8% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.4% | +138.2% | +108.8% | +153.7% | +138.2% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.3% | +79.8% | +141.6% | +69.0% | +118.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +301.1% | +96.2% | +186.7% | +149.0% | +465.8% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.7% | +33.6% | +27.8% | +36.4% | +33.6% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FBIZ and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FBIZ currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 1.34x | 0.70x | 0.50x | 0.94x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.98 | $49.69 | $61.00 | $22.62 | $337.25 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.07 | $26.52 | $45.90 | $12.83 | $262.71 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +99.2% | +99.4% | +94.9% | +95.1% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 74.9 | 62.9 | 51.2 | 59.1 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 0 | 39K | 41K | 7.0M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MOFG as "Buy", FBIZ as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.5% upside for FBIZ (target: $67) vs -36.6% for MOFG (target: $31). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $31.25 | $67.00 | — | $339.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 10 | 2 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.0% | +2.0% | +1.7% | +1.9% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 0 | 13 | 6 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.78 | $0.97 | $1.19 | $0.37 | $5.95 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +0.0% | +0.3% | +3.0% | +3.9% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBIZ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HWBK vs MOFG vs FBIZ vs CZWI vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HWBK or MOFG or FBIZ or CZWI or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HWBK or MOFG or FBIZ or CZWI or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Business Financial Services, Inc. wins at 0. 39x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HWBK or MOFG or FBIZ or CZWI or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) delivered a total return of +141. 6%, compared to +65. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus MOFG's +96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HWBK or MOFG or FBIZ or CZWI or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning MOFG is approximately -767% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HWBK or MOFG or FBIZ or CZWI or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 31. 4% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HWBK or MOFG or FBIZ or CZWI or JPM or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HWBK leads at 71. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HWBK or MOFG or FBIZ or CZWI or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 39x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIZ: 10. 5% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HWBK or MOFG or FBIZ or CZWI or JPM or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is HWBK or MOFG or FBIZ or CZWI or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, MOFG: +96. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HWBK and MOFG and FBIZ and CZWI and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (HWBK (Financial Services) and MOFG (Financial Services) and FBIZ (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HWBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FBIZ is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.