Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
HWBK logo
HWBK
MOFG logo
MOFG
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HWBK vs MOFG vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HWBK
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$260M
5Y Perf.+115.4%
MOFG
MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.02B
5Y Perf.+131.6%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

HWBK vs MOFG vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HWBK logoHWBK
MOFG logoMOFG
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$260M$1.02B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$112M$351M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$24M$58M$57.05B
Gross Margin71.3%63.2%60.0%
Operating Margin26.0%21.3%25.9%
Forward P/E11.0x13.8x14.4x
Total Debt$155M$117M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$105M$205M$343.34B

HWBK vs MOFG vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HWBK
MOFG
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Hawthorn Bancshares… (HWBK)100215.4+115.4%
MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG)100231.6+131.6%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HWBK vs MOFG vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
HWBK
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HWBK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 89.2%, current ratio 0.11x
  • Beta 0.35, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.11x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
MOFG
MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MOFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +71.2% vs JPM's +21.8%
Best for: momentum
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs HWBK's 301.1%
  • PEG 0.81 vs HWBK's 0.93
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJPM logoJPM3.3% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1%
ValueJPM logoJPMBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyHWBK logoHWBKBeta 0.35 vs MOFG's 1.34
DividendsHWBK logoHWBK2.1% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
Momentum (1Y)MOFG logoMOFG+71.2% vs JPM's +21.8%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7%

HWBK vs MOFG vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HWBKHawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking
39.9%$4M
Service
37.5%$4M
Fiduciary and Trust
22.5%$2M
MOFGMidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$69M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

HWBK vs MOFG vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHWBKLAGGINGJPM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HWBK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2501.1x HWBK's $112M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 21.2% (HWBK) to 16.7% (MOFG).

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$112M$351M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$31M$74M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$24M$58M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$23M$79M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+71.3%+63.2%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.0%+21.3%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.2%+16.7%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.4%+22.5%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.4%+113.6%+16.0%
HWBK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MOFG leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.0x trailing earnings, HWBK trades at a 31% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs HWBK's 0.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$260M$1.0B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$310M$929M$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.99x-13.93x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.77x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.93x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.89x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.32x4.94x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.51x1.50x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.37x16.74x8.88x
MOFG leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HWBK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $10 for MOFG. MOFG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HWBK scores 6/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.7%+10.0%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.3%+0.9%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.1%-9.4%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.2%-9.5%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9645
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.89x0.21x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$50M-$88M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$105M$205M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$155M$117M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.92x0.67x0.74x
HWBK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,984 for MOFG. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +71.2% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs HWBK's 30.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.0%+30.2%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+35.8%+71.2%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+123.4%+138.2%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+95.3%+79.8%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+301.1%+96.2%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+30.7%+33.6%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

HWBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

HWBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HWBK currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.35x1.34x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$37.98$49.69$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$27.07$26.52$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+99.2%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.474.959.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded8K07.0M
HWBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — HWBK and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MOFG as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -36.6% for MOFG (target: $31). For income investors, HWBK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.06% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$31.25$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts861
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.1%+2.0%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises14015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.78$0.97$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.1%+0.0%+3.9%
Evenly matched — HWBK and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HWBK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MOFG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallHawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HWBK vs MOFG vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HWBK or MOFG or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HWBK or MOFG or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HWBK or MOFG or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +79. 8% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus MOFG's +96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HWBK or MOFG or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning MOFG is approximately 283% more volatile than HWBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HWBK or MOFG or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 31. 4% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HWBK or MOFG or JPM?

Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 2% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWBK leads at 26. 0% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HWBK leads at 71. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HWBK or MOFG or JPM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.

(MOFG) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HWBK or MOFG or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).

09

Is HWBK or MOFG or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 2. 1% yield, +301. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HWBK: +301. 1%, MOFG: +96. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HWBK and MOFG and JPM?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HWBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.