Drug Manufacturers - General
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
JNJ vs SNY vs JPM vs PFE vs MRK vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Banks - Diversified
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
JNJ vs SNY vs JPM vs PFE vs MRK vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General | Banks - Diversified | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $550.40B | $102.35B | $908.57B | $143.46B | $281.25B | $341.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $92.15B | $46.72B | $280.33B | $63.31B | $64.93B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25.12B | $7.81B | $57.05B | $7.49B | $18.25B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 68.1% | 72.3% | 60.0% | 69.3% | 74.2% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 26.1% | 13.6% | 25.9% | 23.4% | 41.1% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 19.7x | 10.1x | 14.6x | 8.5x | 22.2x | 24.3x |
| Total Debt | $36.63B | $21.79B | $942.38B | $67.42B | $50.53B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24.11B | $7.66B | $343.34B | $1.14B | $14.56B | $10.27B |
JNJ vs SNY vs JPM vs PFE vs MRK vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) | 100 | 162.4 | +62.4% |
| Sanofi (SNY) | 100 | 83.0 | -17.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 81.4 | -18.6% |
| Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) | 100 | 154.4 | +54.4% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JNJ vs SNY vs JPM vs PFE vs MRK vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JNJ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +55.0% vs SNY's -5.9%
SNY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.5%, EPS growth -7.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- 5.5% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs MRK's 160.5%
- PEG 0.83 vs JNJ's 35.11
- Lower P/E (14.6x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.83 vs 2.17
PFE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 6.8%
- 6.8% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%
MRK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, Low D/E 96.0%, current ratio 1.54x
- Beta 0.25, yield 2.9%, current ratio 1.54x
- 28.1% margin vs PFE's 11.8%
- Beta 0.25 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage
KO doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.5% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.83 vs 2.17 | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.1% margin vs PFE's 11.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.8% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.0% vs SNY's -5.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.6% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 22.0% vs 4.5% |
JNJ vs SNY vs JPM vs PFE vs MRK vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JNJ vs SNY vs JPM vs PFE vs MRK vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MRK leads in 1 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • JNJ leads 0 • SNY leads 0 • PFE leads 0 • KO leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 6.0x SNY's $46.7B. MRK is the more profitable business, keeping 28.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PFE's 11.8%. On growth, SNY holds the edge at +59.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $92.1B | $46.7B | $280.3B | $63.3B | $64.9B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31.4B | $9.6B | $81.4B | $21.0B | $32.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25.1B | $7.8B | $57.0B | $7.5B | $18.3B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19.1B | $8.3B | $100.9B | $9.5B | $12.4B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.1% | +72.3% | +60.0% | +69.3% | +74.2% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +13.6% | +25.9% | +23.4% | +41.1% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +16.7% | +20.4% | +11.8% | +28.1% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +17.7% | +36.0% | +15.0% | +19.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +59.9% | — | +5.4% | +4.5% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.0% | -5.2% | +16.0% | -9.5% | -19.6% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SNY and PFE and MRK each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.6x trailing earnings, MRK trades at a 60% valuation discount to JNJ's 39.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MRK offers better value at 0.74x vs JNJ's 35.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $550.4B | $102.4B | $908.6B | $143.5B | $281.2B | $341.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $562.9B | $118.6B | $1.51T | $209.7B | $317.2B | $376.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 39.45x | 18.14x | 16.22x | 18.54x | 15.64x | 26.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.73x | 10.07x | 14.60x | 8.53x | 22.16x | 24.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 35.11x | — | 0.92x | — | 0.74x | 2.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.09x | 10.79x | 18.52x | 10.31x | 10.82x | 25.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.20x | 1.90x | 3.25x | 2.29x | 4.33x | 7.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.76x | 1.25x | 2.51x | 1.65x | 5.42x | 9.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.74x | 10.00x | 9.01x | 15.81x | 22.75x | 64.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SNY and MRK each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $8 for PFE. SNY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SNY scores 7/9 vs MRK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +31.7% | +10.8% | +15.9% | +8.3% | +36.1% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.0% | +6.1% | +1.3% | +3.6% | +14.6% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.7% | +5.5% | +4.5% | +7.5% | +22.0% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.6% | +6.3% | +8.9% | +9.0% | +23.8% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.30x | 2.60x | 0.78x | 0.96x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.5B | $14.1B | $599.0B | $66.3B | $36.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24.1B | $7.7B | $343.3B | $1.1B | $14.6B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36.6B | $21.8B | $942.4B | $67.4B | $50.5B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 48.23x | 17.51x | 0.74x | 4.02x | 19.68x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,632 for PFE. Over the past 12 months, JNJ leads with a +55.0% total return vs SNY's -5.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs PFE's -8.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.4% | -7.1% | +0.8% | +3.6% | +8.6% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +55.0% | -5.9% | +20.9% | +12.8% | +47.8% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.3% | -7.7% | +138.8% | -23.0% | +12.0% | +39.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.8% | +0.2% | +135.5% | -13.7% | +68.5% | +65.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.2% | +58.1% | +481.2% | +23.7% | +160.5% | +115.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.0% | -2.6% | +33.7% | -8.3% | +3.9% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JPM and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs SNY's 80.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.03x | 0.43x | 0.87x | 0.34x | 0.25x | -0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $251.71 | $52.68 | $338.09 | $28.75 | $125.14 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $149.04 | $41.85 | $269.72 | $23.11 | $76.66 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.7% | +80.4% | +96.2% | +87.7% | +91.0% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.5 | 41.0 | 72.1 | 48.7 | 46.4 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.7M | 2.7M | 7.4M | 29.3M | 7.6M | 13.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JNJ and PFE and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JNJ as "Buy", SNY as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", PFE as "Hold", MRK as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.3% upside for SNY (target: $51) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.81% vs JPM's 1.83%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $251.55 | $51.00 | $339.75 | $26.75 | $131.58 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 40 | 27 | 61 | 39 | 37 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +5.1% | +1.8% | +6.8% | +2.9% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 56 | 3 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.87 | $1.88 | $5.95 | $1.72 | $3.26 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +5.4% | +3.8% | 0.0% | +1.8% | +0.2% |
MRK leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
JNJ vs SNY vs JPM vs PFE vs MRK vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JNJ or SNY or JPM or PFE or MRK or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sanofi (SNY) is the stronger pick with 5.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Merck & Co. , Inc. (MRK) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) a "Buy" — based on 40 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JNJ or SNY or JPM or PFE or MRK or KO?
On trailing P/E, Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the cheapest at 15. 6x versus Johnson & Johnson at 39. 4x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 83x versus Johnson & Johnson's 35. 11x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JNJ or SNY or JPM or PFE or MRK or KO?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -13. 7% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus PFE's +23. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JNJ or SNY or JPM or PFE or MRK or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
23β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 87β — meaning JPM is approximately -472% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sanofi (SNY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JNJ or SNY or JPM or PFE or MRK or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sanofi (SNY) is pulling ahead at 5.
5% versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -57. 8% for Johnson & Johnson. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNY leads at 4. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JNJ or SNY or JPM or PFE or MRK or KO?
Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 1% net margin versus 12. 4% for Pfizer Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRK leads at 36. 2% versus 13. 6% for SNY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNY leads at 72. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JNJ or SNY or JPM or PFE or MRK or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus Johnson & Johnson's 35. 11x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc. (PFE) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNY: 20. 3% to $51. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JNJ or SNY or JPM or PFE or MRK or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Pfizer Inc. (PFE) offers the highest yield at 6. 8%, versus 1. 8% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is JNJ or SNY or JPM or PFE or MRK or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, JPM: +481. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JNJ and SNY and JPM and PFE and MRK and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (JNJ (Healthcare) and SNY (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and PFE (Healthcare) and MRK (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JNJ is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SNY is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; MRK is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.