Staffing & Employment Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
JOB vs TBI vs MAN vs KELYA vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
JOB vs TBI vs MAN vs KELYA vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $25M | $212M | $1.57B | $417M | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $88M | $1.25B | $17.96B | $4.13B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-53M | $-13M | $-266M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 28.4% | 16.7% | 19.5% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1.7% | -2.6% | 0.8% | -1.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 9.2x | 13.3x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $171M | $2.39B | $159M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $25M | $871M | $33M | $10.27B |
JOB vs TBI vs MAN vs KELYA vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEE Group, Inc. (JOB) | 100 | 41.9 | -58.1% |
| TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) | 100 | 45.7 | -54.3% |
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 49.5 | -50.5% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 76.1 | -23.9% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JOB vs TBI vs MAN vs KELYA vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JOB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 10.2%, current ratio 4.12x
- Beta 0.64, current ratio 4.12x
- Beta 0.64 vs KELYA's 0.92, lower leverage
- +20.3% vs MAN's -17.3%
TBI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.1%, EPS growth 61.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.5%
- 3.1% revenue growth vs JOB's -17.2%
MAN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 4.2%
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 25.3x)
- 4.2% yield, vs KO's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, KELYA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs KELYA's -24.0%
- 27.8% margin vs KELYA's -6.4%
- 13.1% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs -4.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.1% revenue growth vs JOB's -17.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs KELYA's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs KELYA's 0.92, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs KO's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.3% vs MAN's -17.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs -4.0% |
JOB vs TBI vs MAN vs KELYA vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JOB vs TBI vs MAN vs KELYA vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories
MAN leads 1 • JOB leads 0 • TBI leads 0 • KELYA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 560.2x JOB's $88M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -6.4%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88M | $1.2B | $18.0B | $4.1B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $258,000 | -$10M | $236M | -$35M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | -$53M | -$13M | -$266M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $726,000 | -$60M | -$161M | $66M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +28.4% | +16.7% | +19.5% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | -2.6% | +0.8% | -1.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | -4.3% | -0.1% | -6.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | -4.8% | -0.9% | +1.6% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.5% | -100.0% | +7.1% | -10.7% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -37.5% | +36.2% | -2.1% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MAN's 9.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TBI's 174.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25M | $212M | $1.6B | $417M | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $358M | $3.1B | $544M | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.72x | -4.34x | -117.24x | -1.66x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 9.25x | 13.34x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 174.38x | 9.53x | — | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 0.13x | 0.09x | 0.10x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.50x | 0.76x | 0.77x | 0.43x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 47.21x | — | — | 3.66x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. JOB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | -18.7% | -0.6% | -24.6% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.8% | -8.1% | -0.1% | -11.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.2% | -5.2% | +5.6% | -4.0% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.1% | -5.3% | +6.2% | -4.3% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.62x | 1.16x | 0.16x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | $146M | $1.5B | $126M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $25M | $871M | $33M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $171M | $2.4B | $159M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.91x | -46.19x | 1.98x | -8.78x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,364 for TBI. Over the past 12 months, JOB leads with a +20.3% total return vs MAN's -17.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 13.7% vs TBI's -27.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.5% | +58.6% | +15.5% | +41.1% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.3% | +3.3% | -17.3% | +3.0% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.3% | -61.3% | -46.8% | -28.6% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.9% | -76.4% | -62.5% | -46.1% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | -64.4% | -24.5% | -24.0% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.7% | -27.1% | -19.0% | -10.6% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KELYA's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs MAN's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.88x | 0.69x | 0.92x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.28 | $7.78 | $47.34 | $14.94 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.17 | $3.18 | $25.15 | $7.98 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.1% | +89.7% | +71.8% | +80.6% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.3 | 70.9 | 66.2 | 70.7 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 249K | 323K | 886K | 422K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MAN and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TBI as "Buy", MAN as "Hold", KELYA as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.6% upside for KELYA (target: $15) vs -21.2% for TBI (target: $6). For income investors, MAN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.21% vs KO's 2.46%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.50 | $37.86 | $15.00 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 29 | 5 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +4.2% | +2.6% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.43 | $0.31 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | +2.4% | +2.9% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MAN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
JOB vs TBI vs MAN vs KELYA vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JOB or TBI or MAN or KELYA or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is the stronger pick with 3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 2% for GEE Group, Inc. (JOB). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JOB or TBI or MAN or KELYA or KO?
On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc.
is actually cheaper at 9. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JOB or TBI or MAN or KELYA or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to -76. 4% for TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus JOB's -94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JOB or TBI or MAN or KELYA or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Kelly Services, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning KELYA is approximately -559% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GEE Group, Inc. (JOB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JOB or TBI or MAN or KELYA or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is pulling ahead at 3. 1% versus -17. 2% for GEE Group, Inc. (JOB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrueBlue, Inc. grew EPS 61. 4% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JOB or TBI or MAN or KELYA or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -36. 0% for GEE Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -2. 9% for JOB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JOB or TBI or MAN or KELYA or KO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc.
(MAN) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 16. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KELYA: 24. 6% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JOB or TBI or MAN or KELYA or KO?
In this comparison, MAN (4.
2% yield), KELYA (2. 6% yield), KO (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. JOB, TBI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JOB or TBI or MAN or KELYA or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, TBI: -64. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JOB and TBI and MAN and KELYA and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (JOB (Industrials) and TBI (Industrials) and MAN (Industrials) and KELYA (Industrials) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JOB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KELYA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. MAN, KELYA, KO pay a dividend while JOB, TBI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.