Education & Training Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
KIDZ vs ATGE vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
KIDZ vs ATGE vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $2M | $3.70B | $342.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $1.89B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $253M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 57.8% | 58.1% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -136.5% | 19.3% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.4x | 24.3x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $774M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $200M | $10.27B |
KIDZ vs ATGE vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classover Holdings,… (KIDZ) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| Adtalem Global Educ… (ATGE) | 100 | 92.3 | -7.7% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 109.6 | +9.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIDZ vs ATGE vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KIDZ plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
ATGE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.33
- Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth 79.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.0%
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs KO's 112.2%
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 2.18 vs ATGE's 2.18
- 27.8% margin vs KIDZ's -356.2%
- 2.6% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.9% revenue growth vs KIDZ's -8.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs KIDZ's -356.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs KIDZ's 2.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.7% vs KIDZ's -99.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs KIDZ's -60.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -57.7% |
KIDZ vs ATGE vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KIDZ vs ATGE vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 16055.5x KIDZ's $3M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZ's -3.6%. On growth, ATGE holds the edge at +12.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $1.9B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $450M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $253M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $368M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.8% | +58.1% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -136.5% | +19.3% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +13.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -136.0% | +19.5% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.4% | +12.4% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.4% | +6.1% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KIDZ and ATGE each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.6x trailing earnings, ATGE trades at a 33% valuation discount to KO's 26.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KO offers better value at 2.34x vs ATGE's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $3.7B | $342.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $4.3B | $377.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.17x | 17.57x | 26.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.44x | 24.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.85x | 2.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.85x | 25.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.56x | 2.07x | 7.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.31x | 2.85x | 10.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.85x | 64.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-3 for KIDZ. ATGE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KIDZ's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATGE scores 8/9 vs KIDZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | +18.4% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.2% | +9.7% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -57.7% | +12.8% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -61.4% | +15.2% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.50x | 0.54x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | $574M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $200M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $774M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.43x | 8.55x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ATGE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ATGE five years ago would be worth $27,778 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12 for KIDZ. Over the past 12 months, KO leads with a +13.7% total return vs KIDZ's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATGE at 36.3% vs KIDZ's -89.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -97.4% | +2.1% | +15.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | -12.2% | +13.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +153.1% | +41.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +177.8% | +59.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +538.9% | +112.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -89.3% | +36.3% | +12.3% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIDZ's 2.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs KIDZ's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.94x | 0.33x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2327.70 | $156.26 | $82.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.19 | $86.97 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.1% | +68.2% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.8 | 57.3 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 329K | 12.5M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ATGE as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.4% upside for ATGE (target: $138) vs 8.5% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $138.00 | $86.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.8% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ATGE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
KIDZ vs ATGE vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIDZ or ATGE or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Adtalem Global Education Inc.
(ATGE) is the stronger pick with 12. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock (KIDZ). Adtalem Global Education Inc. (ATGE) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Adtalem Global Education Inc. (ATGE) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KIDZ or ATGE or KO?
On trailing P/E, Adtalem Global Education Inc.
(ATGE) is the cheapest at 17. 6x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 2x. On forward P/E, Adtalem Global Education Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Coca-Cola Company wins at 2. 18x versus Adtalem Global Education Inc. 's 2. 18x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KIDZ or ATGE or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Adtalem Global Education Inc.
(ATGE) delivered a total return of +177. 8%, compared to -99. 9% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock (KIDZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATGE returned +538. 9% versus KIDZ's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KIDZ or ATGE or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock's 2. 94β — meaning KIDZ is approximately -2085% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Adtalem Global Education Inc. (ATGE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 3% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KIDZ or ATGE or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Adtalem Global Education Inc.
(ATGE) is pulling ahead at 12. 9% versus -8. 4% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock (KIDZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Adtalem Global Education Inc. grew EPS 79. 1% year-over-year, compared to -498. 7% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, KIDZ leads at 21. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KIDZ or ATGE or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -209. 3% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -106. 7% for KIDZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KIDZ or ATGE or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 18x versus Adtalem Global Education Inc. 's 2. 18x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Adtalem Global Education Inc. (ATGE) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 10. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATGE: 29. 4% to $138. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KIDZ or ATGE or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
6% yield) pays a dividend. KIDZ, ATGE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KIDZ or ATGE or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 6% yield, +112. 2% 10Y return). Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock (KIDZ) carries a higher beta of 2. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +112. 2%, KIDZ: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KIDZ and ATGE and KO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KIDZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATGE is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while KIDZ, ATGE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.