Education & Training Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs KO vs DUOL vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Software - Application
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Software - Application
Banks - Diversified
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs KO vs DUOL vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Software - Application | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Software - Application | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $21K | $551M | $2M | $355.61B | $5.71B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $6.15B | $96M | $49.28B | $1.10B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-323M | $-16M | $13.70B | $422M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 57.8% | 67.4% | 74.0% | 61.7% | 72.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -136.5% | -8.2% | -14.0% | 29.3% | 14.2% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 355.8x | 25.3x | 43.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $586M | $3M | $45.49B | $94M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $712M | $39M | $10.27B | $1.04B | $343.34B |
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs KO vs DUOL vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIDZ AI Inc. Warran… (KIDZW) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 86.9 | -13.1% |
| 51Talk Online Educa… (COE) | 100 | 362.2 | +262.2% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 132.7 | +32.7% |
| Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) | 100 | 142.1 | +42.1% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 226.2 | +126.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs KO vs DUOL vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 6 stocks, KIDZW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GOTU doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
COE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and stability.
- 89.1% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -8.4%
- Beta 0.76 vs KIDZW's 2.66
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (4 stocks pay no dividend)
DUOL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 38.7%, EPS growth 355.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 41.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 7.0%, current ratio 2.61x
- Beta 0.88, current ratio 2.61x
- 38.4% margin vs KIDZW's -356.2%
JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 43.3x)
- +21.8% vs KIDZW's -99.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 89.1% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -8.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 43.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.4% margin vs KIDZW's -356.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs KIDZW's 2.66 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (4 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.8% vs KIDZW's -99.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.6% ROA vs KIDZW's -60.2%, ROIC 40.8% vs -57.7% |
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs KO vs DUOL vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs KO vs DUOL vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
KO leads 2 • KIDZW leads 0 • GOTU leads 0 • COE leads 0 • DUOL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — COE and DUOL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 91325.5x KIDZW's $3M. DUOL is the more profitable business, keeping 38.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZW's -3.6%. On growth, COE holds the edge at +89.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $6.1B | $96M | $49.3B | $1.1B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$327M | -$15M | $15.5B | $167M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$323M | -$16M | $13.7B | $422M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $247M | $10M | $12.6B | $423M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.8% | +67.4% | +74.0% | +61.7% | +72.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -136.5% | -8.2% | -14.0% | +29.3% | +14.2% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | -5.3% | -16.5% | +27.8% | +38.4% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -136.0% | +4.0% | +9.9% | +25.5% | +38.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.4% | +21.4% | +89.4% | +12.1% | +26.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.4% | +36.1% | -2.9% | +18.2% | +29.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, DUOL trades at a 47% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21,143 | $551M | $2M | $355.6B | $5.7B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $533M | -$34M | $390.8B | $4.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -12.24x | -0.12x | 27.18x | 14.31x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 355.83x | 25.27x | 43.26x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.43x | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 26.39x | 31.82x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 0.61x | 0.02x | 7.42x | 5.51x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 3.01x | — | 10.40x | 4.40x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.12x | 0.21x | 67.15x | 15.45x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — KO and DUOL each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-3 for KIDZW. DUOL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs DUOL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | -20.8% | — | +41.1% | +33.6% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.2% | -5.8% | -27.5% | +13.1% | +22.6% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -57.7% | -33.8% | — | +15.8% | +40.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -61.4% | -22.2% | — | +17.3% | +7.9% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.50x | 0.47x | — | 1.33x | 0.07x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | -$127M | -$36M | $35.2B | -$943M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $712M | $39M | $10.3B | $1.0B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $586M | $3M | $45.5B | $94M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.06x | — | — | 10.70x | — | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $50 for KIDZW. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs KIDZW's -99.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COE at 45.8% vs KIDZW's -72.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.2% | -37.7% | -35.6% | +20.3% | -30.5% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.2% | -61.9% | -26.5% | +17.2% | -74.5% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | -54.2% | +210.0% | +47.0% | -22.3% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -90.6% | -51.1% | +65.6% | -11.8% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -85.5% | -76.3% | +121.1% | -11.8% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -72.4% | -22.9% | +45.8% | +13.7% | -8.1% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIDZW's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs KIDZW's 0.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.66x | 0.98x | 0.76x | -0.20x | 0.88x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.48 | $4.12 | $56.13 | $84.04 | $489.00 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $1.40 | $15.32 | $65.35 | $87.89 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.6% | +36.9% | +35.9% | +98.3% | +25.1% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.4 | 30.7 | 37.4 | 60.6 | 66.2 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 396K | 8K | 12.7M | 1.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOTU as "Hold", COE as "Buy", KO as "Buy", DUOL as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 93.4% upside for GOTU (target: $3) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.94 | — | $86.13 | $136.17 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 2 | 48 | 22 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +2.5% | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.04 | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.2% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). KO leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE vs KO vs DUOL vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIDZW or GOTU or COE or KO or DUOL or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the stronger pick with 89.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (43. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or KO or DUOL or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is the cheapest at 14. 3x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or KO or DUOL or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -99. 5% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus KIDZW's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or KO or DUOL or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI's 2. 66β — meaning KIDZW is approximately -1429% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or KO or DUOL or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is pulling ahead at 89.
1% versus -8. 4% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Duolingo, Inc. grew EPS 355. 9% year-over-year, compared to -498. 7% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI. Over a 3-year CAGR, COE leads at 85. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or KO or DUOL or JPM?
Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 9% net margin versus -209. 3% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI — meaning it keeps 39. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -106. 7% for KIDZW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COE leads at 73. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KIDZW or GOTU or COE or KO or DUOL or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 355. 8x for 51Talk Online Education Group — 341. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GOTU: 93. 4% to $2. 94.
08Which pays a better dividend — KIDZW or GOTU or COE or KO or DUOL or JPM?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. KIDZW, GOTU, COE, DUOL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KIDZW or GOTU or COE or KO or DUOL or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, KIDZW: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KIDZW and GOTU and COE and KO and DUOL and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (KIDZW (Consumer Defensive) and GOTU (Consumer Defensive) and COE (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and DUOL (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KIDZW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; COE is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DUOL is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. KO, JPM pay a dividend while KIDZW, GOTU, COE, DUOL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.