Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MAMA logo
MAMA
HNST logo
HNST
BRBS logo
BRBS
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MAMA vs HNST vs BRBS vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MAMA
Mama's Creations, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$607M
5Y Perf.+436.3%
HNST
The Honest Company, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$398M
5Y Perf.-74.8%
BRBS
Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesAMEX • US
Market Cap$302M
5Y Perf.-80.7%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+44.9%

MAMA vs HNST vs BRBS vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MAMA logoMAMA
HNST logoHNST
BRBS logoBRBS
KO logoKO
IndustryPackaged FoodsSpecialty RetailBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$607M$398M$302M$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$189M$352M$151M$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$6M$-19M$11M$13.70B
Gross Margin24.5%33.9%63.5%61.7%
Operating Margin4.3%-5.0%9.1%29.3%
Forward P/E139.7x51.7x30.0x25.3x
Total Debt$14M$5M$179M$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$20M$90M$116M$10.27B

MAMA vs HNST vs BRBS vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MAMA
HNST
BRBS
KO
StockJul 21Jun 26Return
Mama's Creations, I… (MAMA)100536.3+436.3%
The Honest Company,… (HNST)10025.2-74.8%
Blue Ridge Bankshar… (BRBS)10019.3-80.7%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100144.9+44.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MAMA vs HNST vs BRBS vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Mama's Creations, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. BRBS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
MAMA
Mama's Creations, Inc.
The Growth Play

MAMA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 39.2%, EPS growth 38.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
  • 5.2% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 27.5%, current ratio 2.17x
  • 39.2% revenue growth vs BRBS's -13.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
HNST
The Honest Company, Inc.
The Secondary Option

HNST lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
BRBS
Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BRBS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 6.5%
  • Beta 0.48, yield 6.5%
  • Beta 0.48 vs HNST's 1.45
  • 6.5% yield, vs KO's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Value Play

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (25.3x vs 30.0x)
  • 27.8% margin vs HNST's -5.4%
  • 13.1% ROA vs HNST's -8.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -13.5%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMAMA logoMAMA39.2% revenue growth vs BRBS's -13.4%
ValueKO logoKOLower P/E (25.3x vs 30.0x)
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs HNST's -5.4%
Stability / SafetyBRBS logoBRBSBeta 0.48 vs HNST's 1.45
DividendsBRBS logoBRBS6.5% yield, vs KO's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MAMA logoMAMA+87.3% vs HNST's -23.9%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs HNST's -8.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -13.5%

MAMA vs HNST vs BRBS vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MAMAMama's Creations, Inc.
FY 2026
Reportable Segment
100.0%$172M
HNSTThe Honest Company, Inc.
FY 2023
Diapers and Wipes
63.4%$218M
Skin and Personal Care
25.6%$88M
Household and Wellness
11.0%$38M
BRBSBlue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.
FY 2020
Bank And Purchase Card Revenue
100.0%$1M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

MAMA vs HNST vs BRBS vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGBRBS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 327.2x BRBS's $151M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HNST's -5.4%. On growth, MAMA holds the edge at +49.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…HNST logoHNSTThe Honest Compan…BRBS logoBRBSBlue Ridge Banksh…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$189M$352M$151M$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$14M-$10M$15M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$6M-$19M$11M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9M$20M$9M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+24.5%+33.9%+63.5%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.3%-5.0%+9.1%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.2%-5.4%+7.1%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.8%+5.8%+6.1%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+49.7%-19.7%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+51.3%-101.3%+2.6%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HNST leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 27.2x trailing earnings, KO trades at a 76% valuation discount to MAMA's 114.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KO offers better value at 2.43x vs MAMA's 71.07x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…HNST logoHNSTThe Honest Compan…BRBS logoBRBSBlue Ridge Banksh…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$607M$398M$302M$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$601M$314M$365M$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS114.69x-25.86x30.00x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.139.74x51.71x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate71.07x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple40.90x24.32x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.53x1.07x2.00x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share11.73x2.37x1.08x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF62.14x29.28x80.64x67.15x
HNST leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — MAMA and HNST and KO each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-11 for HNST. HNST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs BRBS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…HNST logoHNSTThe Honest Compan…BRBS logoBRBSBlue Ridge Banksh…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.0%-10.6%+3.1%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.9%-8.2%+0.4%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+16.8%-13.5%+2.0%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+17.7%-10.2%+0.5%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96557
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.27x0.03x0.55x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M-$85M$63M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$20M$90M$116M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$14M$5M$179M$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense16.57x-26.35x0.23x10.70x
Evenly matched — MAMA and HNST and KO each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MAMA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MAMA five years ago would be worth $61,867 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,968 for HNST. Over the past 12 months, MAMA leads with a +87.3% total return vs HNST's -23.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAMA at 76.8% vs BRBS's -23.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…HNST logoHNSTThe Honest Compan…BRBS logoBRBSBlue Ridge Banksh…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+15.3%+38.7%-9.1%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+87.3%-23.9%+21.0%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+452.2%+119.4%-54.7%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+518.7%-80.3%-70.4%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+518.7%-77.4%-15.5%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+76.8%+29.9%-23.2%+13.7%
MAMA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HNST's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs HNST's 68.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…HNST logoHNSTThe Honest Compan…BRBS logoBRBSBlue Ridge Banksh…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.74x1.45x0.48x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.85$5.28$4.79$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.75$2.07$3.23$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+83.5%+68.6%+68.9%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.657.445.760.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded427K1.6M335K12.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — BRBS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MAMA as "Buy", HNST as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.3% upside for MAMA (target: $23) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, BRBS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.45% vs KO's 2.46%.

MetricMAMA logoMAMAMama's Creations,…HNST logoHNSTThe Honest Compan…BRBS logoBRBSBlue Ridge Banksh…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$23.00$3.80$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts71048
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+6.5%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01056
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.21$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.1%+0.2%
Evenly matched — BRBS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). HNST leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MAMA vs HNST vs BRBS vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MAMA or HNST or BRBS or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Mama's Creations, Inc.

(MAMA) is the stronger pick with 39. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 4% for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MAMA or HNST or BRBS or KO?

On trailing P/E, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the cheapest at 27.

2x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. at 114. 7x. On forward P/E, The Coca-Cola Company is actually cheaper at 25. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Coca-Cola Company wins at 2. 26x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 86. 59x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MAMA or HNST or BRBS or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Mama's Creations, Inc.

(MAMA) delivered a total return of +518. 7%, compared to -80. 3% for The Honest Company, Inc. (HNST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAMA returned +518. 7% versus HNST's -77. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MAMA or HNST or BRBS or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus The Honest Company, Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning HNST is approximately -825% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Honest Company, Inc. (HNST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MAMA or HNST or BRBS or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mama's Creations, Inc.

(MAMA) is pulling ahead at 39. 2% versus -13. 4% for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 135. 5% year-over-year, compared to -129. 1% for The Honest Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAMA leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MAMA or HNST or BRBS or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -4. 2% for The Honest Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -5. 0% for HNST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BRBS leads at 63. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MAMA or HNST or BRBS or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 26x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 86. 59x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) trades at 25. 3x forward P/E versus 139. 7x for Mama's Creations, Inc. — 114. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAMA: 54. 3% to $23. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MAMA or HNST or BRBS or KO?

In this comparison, BRBS (6.

5% yield), KO (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. MAMA, HNST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MAMA or HNST or BRBS or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, HNST: -77. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MAMA and HNST and BRBS and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (MAMA (Consumer Defensive) and HNST (Consumer Cyclical) and BRBS (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MAMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; HNST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BRBS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. BRBS, KO pay a dividend while MAMA, HNST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.