Packaged Foods
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MAMA vs HNST vs WMT vs BYND vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Discount Stores
Packaged Foods
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
MAMA vs HNST vs WMT vs BYND vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores | Packaged Foods | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $607M | $398M | $964.49B | $316M | $896.00B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $189M | $352M | $725.30B | $265M | $280.33B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $-19M | $23.06B | $244M | $57.05B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 33.9% | 25.0% | 3.5% | 60.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | -5.0% | 4.2% | -82.4% | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 139.7x | 51.7x | 41.7x | — | 14.4x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $5M | $67.09B | $508M | $942.38B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $90M | $10.73B | $208M | $343.34B | $10.27B |
MAMA vs HNST vs WMT vs BYND vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mama's Creations, I… (MAMA) | 100 | 536.3 | +436.3% |
| The Honest Company,… (HNST) | 100 | 25.2 | -74.8% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 254.6 | +154.6% |
| Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 211.3 | +111.3% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 144.9 | +44.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAMA vs HNST vs WMT vs BYND vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAMA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 39.2%, EPS growth 38.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 27.5%, current ratio 2.17x
- Beta 0.74, current ratio 2.17x
Among these 6 stocks, HNST doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
WMT doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
BYND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 92.2% margin vs HNST's -5.4%
- 39.3% ROA vs HNST's -8.2%, ROIC -44.4% vs -13.5%
JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.81 vs WMT's 3.79
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.2% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 92.2% margin vs HNST's -5.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs BYND's 1.79 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.3% vs BYND's -79.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.3% ROA vs HNST's -8.2%, ROIC -44.4% vs -13.5% |
MAMA vs HNST vs WMT vs BYND vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MAMA vs HNST vs WMT vs BYND vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • MAMA leads 1 • HNST leads 0 • WMT leads 0 • BYND leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BYND and KO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $725.3B annually — 3833.0x MAMA's $189M. BYND is the more profitable business, keeping 92.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HNST's -5.4%. On growth, MAMA holds the edge at +49.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $189M | $352M | $725.3B | $265M | $280.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | -$10M | $41.4B | -$187M | $81.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | -$19M | $23.1B | $244M | $57.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $20M | $12.6B | -$134M | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +33.9% | +25.0% | +3.5% | +60.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | -5.0% | +4.2% | -82.4% | +25.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | -5.4% | +3.2% | +92.2% | +20.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +5.8% | +1.7% | -50.6% | +36.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.7% | -19.7% | +7.3% | -15.3% | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +51.3% | -101.3% | +19.6% | +90.9% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 86% valuation discount to MAMA's 114.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs MAMA's 71.07x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $607M | $398M | $964.5B | $316M | $896.0B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $601M | $314M | $1.02T | $616M | $1.50T | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 114.69x | -25.86x | 44.32x | -0.37x | 16.00x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 139.74x | 51.71x | 41.66x | — | 14.40x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 71.07x | — | 4.03x | — | 0.90x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 40.90x | — | 23.19x | — | 18.36x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.53x | 1.07x | 1.35x | 1.15x | 3.20x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.73x | 2.37x | 9.14x | — | 2.47x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 62.14x | 29.28x | 64.63x | — | 8.88x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MAMA and HNST each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-11 for HNST. HNST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs BYND's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | -10.6% | +22.7% | — | +15.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.9% | -8.2% | +8.1% | +39.3% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.8% | -13.5% | +14.4% | -44.4% | +4.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.7% | -10.2% | +17.5% | -40.3% | +8.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | 0.03x | 0.63x | — | 2.60x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$85M | $56.4B | $300M | $599.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $90M | $10.7B | $208M | $343.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $5M | $67.1B | $508M | $942.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.57x | -26.35x | 11.70x | -11.47x | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAMA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAMA five years ago would be worth $61,867 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45 for BYND. Over the past 12 months, MAMA leads with a +87.3% total return vs BYND's -79.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAMA at 76.8% vs BYND's -62.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.3% | +38.7% | +7.7% | -22.7% | -0.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +87.3% | -23.9% | +28.6% | -79.2% | +21.8% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +452.2% | +119.4% | +140.7% | -94.5% | +138.2% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +518.7% | -80.3% | +167.1% | -99.6% | +118.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +518.7% | -77.4% | +447.2% | -99.0% | +465.8% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +76.8% | +29.9% | +34.0% | -62.0% | +33.6% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BYND's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs BYND's 8.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 1.45x | -0.00x | 1.79x | 0.94x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.85 | $5.28 | $135.16 | $7.69 | $337.25 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.75 | $2.07 | $93.43 | $0.50 | $262.71 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.5% | +68.6% | +89.5% | +8.9% | +95.1% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 57.4 | 45.9 | 42.8 | 59.1 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 427K | 1.6M | 18.3M | 62.1M | 7.0M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MAMA as "Buy", HNST as "Hold", WMT as "Buy", BYND as "Sell", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6439.0% upside for BYND (target: $45) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs WMT's 0.77%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $3.80 | $139.44 | $44.55 | $339.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 10 | 66 | 21 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.8% | — | +1.9% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 52 | — | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.94 | — | $5.95 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). JPM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MAMA vs HNST vs WMT vs BYND vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAMA or HNST or WMT or BYND or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mama's Creations, Inc.
(MAMA) is the stronger pick with 39. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAMA or HNST or WMT or BYND or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. at 114. 7x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 86. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAMA or HNST or WMT or BYND or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Mama's Creations, Inc.
(MAMA) delivered a total return of +518. 7%, compared to -99. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAMA returned +518. 7% versus BYND's -99. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAMA or HNST or WMT or BYND or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Beyond Meat, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning BYND is approximately -992% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Honest Company, Inc. (HNST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAMA or HNST or WMT or BYND or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mama's Creations, Inc.
(MAMA) is pulling ahead at 39. 2% versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mama's Creations, Inc. grew EPS 38. 2% year-over-year, compared to -129. 1% for The Honest Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAMA leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAMA or HNST or WMT or BYND or JPM or KO?
Beyond Meat, Inc.
(BYND) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 8% net margin versus -4. 2% for The Honest Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 79. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -84. 7% for BYND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAMA or HNST or WMT or BYND or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 86. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 139. 7x for Mama's Creations, Inc. — 125. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BYND: 6439. 0% to $44. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAMA or HNST or WMT or BYND or JPM or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), WMT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. MAMA, HNST, BYND do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MAMA or HNST or WMT or BYND or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 00), 0. 8% yield, +447. 2% 10Y return). Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +447. 2%, BYND: -99. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAMA and HNST and WMT and BYND and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (MAMA (Consumer Defensive) and HNST (Consumer Cyclical) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and BYND (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MAMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; HNST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; BYND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. WMT, JPM, KO pay a dividend while MAMA, HNST, BYND do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.