Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MRT logo
MRT
BIRD logo
BIRD
ONON logo
ONON
CROX logo
CROX
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MRT
Marti Technologies, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyAMEX • TR
Market Cap$146M
5Y Perf.-82.4%
BIRD
Allbirds, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$31M
5Y Perf.-99.0%
ONON
On Holding AG

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CH
Market Cap$12.86B
5Y Perf.-3.9%
CROX
Crocs, Inc.

Apparel - Footwear & Accessories

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.24B
5Y Perf.-24.0%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+57.5%

MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MRT logoMRT
BIRD logoBIRD
ONON logoONON
CROX logoCROX
KO logoKO
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - InfrastructureApparel - RetailApparel - Footwear & AccessoriesBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$146M$31M$12.86B$6.24B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$35M$143M$3.13B$4.02B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$-53M$-76M$252M$-104M$13.70B
Gross Margin47.5%37.1%63.9%58.1%61.7%
Operating Margin-101.9%-51.0%13.4%21.5%29.3%
Forward P/E27.4x9.1x25.3x
Total Debt$87M$40M$582M$1.61B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$8M$27M$1.02B$130M$10.27B

MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MRT
BIRD
ONON
CROX
KO
StockNov 21Jun 26Return
Marti Technologies,… (MRT)10017.6-82.4%
Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD)1001.0-99.0%
On Holding AG (ONON)10096.1-3.9%
Crocs, Inc. (CROX)10076.0-24.0%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100157.5+57.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Marti Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. CROX also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
MRT
Marti Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick

MRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.62
  • Rev growth 110.3%, EPS growth 57.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
  • 110.3% revenue growth vs BIRD's -19.7%
  • Beta 0.62 vs BIRD's 1.81
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
BIRD
Allbirds, Inc.
The Technology Pick

BIRD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
ONON
On Holding AG
The Defensive Pick

ONON is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.53, Low D/E 35.6%, current ratio 2.71x
  • Beta 1.53, current ratio 2.71x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CROX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 10.9% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
  • Lower P/E (9.1x vs 25.3x)
  • +20.3% vs BIRD's -69.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.

  • 27.8% margin vs MRT's -151.1%
  • 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 13.1% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -147.7%
Best for: quality and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMRT logoMRT110.3% revenue growth vs BIRD's -19.7%
ValueCROX logoCROXLower P/E (9.1x vs 25.3x)
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs MRT's -151.1%
Stability / SafetyMRT logoMRTBeta 0.62 vs BIRD's 1.81
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CROX logoCROX+20.3% vs BIRD's -69.0%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -147.7%

MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MRTMarti Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Other Member
50.3%$298,798
Fuel
32.5%$192,849
Electricity
17.2%$102,030
BIRDAllbirds, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$152M
ONONOn Holding AG
FY 2025
Shoes
93.0%$2.8B
Apparel
5.6%$170M
Accessories
1.3%$40M
CROXCrocs, Inc.
FY 2025
Crocs Brand Segment
82.3%$3.3B
HEYDUDE Brand Segment
17.7%$715M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGONON

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 1413.0x MRT's $35M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRT's -151.1%. On growth, MRT holds the edge at +115.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.ONON logoONONOn Holding AGCROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$35M$143M$3.1B$4.0B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$31M-$65M$555M$946M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$53M-$76M$252M-$104M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$18M-$42M$307M$671M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.5%+37.1%+63.9%+58.1%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-101.9%-51.0%+13.4%+21.5%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-151.1%-53.4%+8.1%-2.6%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-53.0%-29.3%+9.8%+16.7%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+115.4%-30.5%+17.0%-1.7%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+33.6%+12.5%+82.4%-4.2%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CROX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 27.2x trailing earnings, KO trades at a 49% valuation discount to ONON's 53.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CROX's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KO's 26.4x.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.ONON logoONONOn Holding AGCROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$146M$31M$12.9B$6.2B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$225M$43M$12.3B$7.7B$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.21x-0.39x53.00x-83.14x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.27.43x9.13x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.35x7.99x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.73x0.20x3.56x1.54x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.83x6.28x5.23x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF40.47x9.47x67.15x
CROX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — ONON and KO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-174 for BIRD. ONON carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ONON scores 7/9 vs BIRD's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.ONON logoONONOn Holding AGCROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-173.5%+15.9%-7.5%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.6%-67.5%+9.1%-2.4%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-147.7%-82.0%+26.9%+21.7%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-138.0%-70.5%+18.8%+23.5%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–952757
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.10x0.36x1.25x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$79M$13M-$439M$1.5B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$27M$1.0B$130M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$87M$40M$582M$1.6B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.71x-32.09x9.16x10.07x10.70x
Evenly matched — ONON and KO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CROX and KO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $63 for BIRD. Over the past 12 months, CROX leads with a +20.3% total return vs BIRD's -69.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 13.7% vs BIRD's -47.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.ONON logoONONOn Holding AGCROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-26.7%-11.2%-17.8%+43.4%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-37.5%-69.0%-30.8%+20.3%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.9%-85.6%+26.2%+7.9%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-82.5%-99.4%+10.2%+10.8%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.0%-99.4%+10.2%+1086.6%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-45.5%-47.6%+8.1%+2.6%+13.7%
Evenly matched — CROX and KO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIRD's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs BIRD's 15.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.ONON logoONONOn Holding AGCROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.62x1.81x1.53x1.09x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.15$24.31$56.82$129.45$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.55$2.15$31.41$73.21$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+54.0%+15.1%+67.9%+96.3%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.142.257.667.660.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded25K7.4M5.8M1.2M12.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: MRT as "Hold", ONON as "Buy", CROX as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 88.2% upside for MRT (target: $3) vs -6.9% for CROX (target: $116). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.ONON logoONONOn Holding AGCROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.20$54.36$116.11$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts1263748
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0056
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%0.0%0.0%+9.4%+0.2%
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). CROX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Marti Technologies, Inc.

(MRT) is the stronger pick with 110. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 7% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate On Holding AG (ONON) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or KO?

On trailing P/E, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the cheapest at 27.

2x versus On Holding AG at 53. 0x. On forward P/E, Crocs, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or KO?

Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.

6%, compared to -99. 4% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CROX returned +1087% versus BIRD's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Allbirds, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning BIRD is approximately -1006% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, On Holding AG (ONON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marti Technologies, Inc.

(MRT) is pulling ahead at 110. 3% versus -19. 7% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marti Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 57. 6% year-over-year, compared to -109. 4% for Crocs, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ONON leads at 33. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -105. 6% for Marti Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -51. 0% for MRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONON leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or KO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Crocs, Inc.

(CROX) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 27. 4x for On Holding AG — 18. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRT: 88. 2% to $3. 20.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. MRT, BIRD, ONON, CROX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, BIRD: -99. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MRT and BIRD and ONON and CROX and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (MRT (Technology) and BIRD (Technology) and ONON (Consumer Cyclical) and CROX (Consumer Cyclical) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BIRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ONON is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CROX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while MRT, BIRD, ONON, CROX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.