Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
NAK logo
NAK
FCX logo
FCX
SCCO logo
SCCO
TECK logo
TECK
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NAK vs FCX vs SCCO vs TECK vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$1.14B
5Y Perf.+42.7%
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$98.32B
5Y Perf.+491.3%
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$156.78B
5Y Perf.+401.3%
TECK
Teck Resources Limited

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$31.22B
5Y Perf.+522.3%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%

NAK vs FCX vs SCCO vs TECK vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NAK logoNAK
FCX logoFCX
SCCO logoSCCO
TECK logoTECK
KO logoKO
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsCopperCopperIndustrial MaterialsBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$1.14B$98.32B$156.78B$31.22B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$26.42B$13.42B$12.41B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$-40M$2.73B$4.33B$1.85B$13.70B
Gross Margin27.8%56.7%30.3%61.7%
Operating Margin27.8%52.2%23.9%29.3%
Forward P/E25.7x26.2x13.3x25.3x
Total Debt$3M$11.50B$7.41B$10.39B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$55M$3.35B$4.30B$5.01B$10.27B

NAK vs FCX vs SCCO vs TECK vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NAK
FCX
SCCO
TECK
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Northern Dynasty Mi… (NAK)100142.7+42.7%
Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX)100591.3+491.3%
Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO)100501.3+401.3%
Teck Resources Limi… (TECK)100622.3+522.3%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NAK vs FCX vs SCCO vs TECK vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SCCO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. FCX, TECK, and KO also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇SCCO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
The Growth Leader

NAK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 43.8% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
Best for: growth
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
The Value Pick

FCX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.86 vs KO's 2.26
  • PEG 0.86 vs 2.26
Best for: valuation efficiency
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

SCCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 7.6% 10Y total return vs NAK's 5.1%
  • Beta 2.31, yield 1.6%, current ratio 3.89x
  • 32.3% margin vs NAK's -0.3%
  • +104.8% vs KO's +17.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
TECK
Teck Resources Limited
The Growth Play

TECK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 262.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.11, Low D/E 40.0%, current ratio 2.54x
  • Beta 2.11 vs NAK's 2.42
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs TECK's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNAK logoNAK43.8% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
ValueFCX logoFCXPEG 0.86 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsSCCO logoSCCO32.3% margin vs NAK's -0.3%
Stability / SafetyTECK logoTECKBeta 2.11 vs NAK's 2.42
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs TECK's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SCCO logoSCCO+104.8% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)SCCO logoSCCO21.4% ROA vs NAK's -32.3%, ROIC 38.6% vs -68.7%

NAK vs FCX vs SCCO vs TECK vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Critical Minerals Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Critical Minerals Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
NAKNorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

FCXFreeport-McMoRan Inc.
FY 2025
Copper Cathode
31.4%$8.1B
Copper In Concentrates
24.3%$6.3B
Refined Copper Products
17.0%$4.4B
Gold
15.0%$3.9B
Molybdenum
7.6%$2.0B
Other Products Or Services
2.9%$749M
Purchased Copper
1.7%$449M
SCCOSouthern Copper Corporation
FY 2025
Copper
74.8%$10.0B
Molybdenum
10.5%$1.4B
Silver
7.3%$974M
Zinc
3.9%$530M
Other
3.6%$477M
TECKTeck Resources Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

NAK vs FCX vs SCCO vs TECK vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSCCOLAGGINGTECK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SCCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO and NAK operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. SCCO is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCX's 10.3%. On growth, TECK holds the edge at +72.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$26.4B$13.4B$12.4B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$22M$9.6B$7.9B$4.8B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$40M$2.7B$4.3B$1.8B$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$23M$6.2B$3.4B$482M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+27.8%+56.7%+30.3%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.8%+52.2%+23.9%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+10.3%+32.3%+14.9%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+23.6%+25.5%+3.9%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.2%+39.0%+72.2%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+146.8%+154.2%+54.5%+128.8%+18.2%
SCCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FCX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 27.2x trailing earnings, KO trades at a 40% valuation discount to FCX's 45.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCX offers better value at 1.50x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$98.3B$156.8B$31.2B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$106.5B$159.9B$35.1B$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-15.01x45.01x36.22x32.03x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.71x26.16x13.35x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.50x1.73x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.48x20.32x13.35x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.82x11.68x4.06x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share88.49x3.21x14.33x1.73x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF88.10x45.75x67.15x
FCX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-99 for NAK. NAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCCO scores 8/9 vs NAK's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-98.8%+8.9%+42.0%+7.1%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-32.3%+4.7%+21.4%+4.1%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-68.7%+12.8%+38.6%+4.4%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-40.1%+12.4%+39.2%+4.2%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–925867
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.37x0.67x0.40x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$52M$8.1B$3.1B$5.4B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$55M$3.4B$4.3B$5.0B$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$11.5B$7.4B$10.4B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-74.40x17.68x19.33x4.16x10.70x
SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NAK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NAK five years ago would be worth $37,004 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,560 for KO. Over the past 12 months, SCCO leads with a +104.8% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NAK at 110.7% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+4.6%+32.3%+29.7%+35.2%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+65.9%+67.6%+104.8%+71.7%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+834.9%+85.6%+197.7%+58.6%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+270.0%+80.5%+230.7%+193.2%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+514.1%+589.8%+762.4%+496.5%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+110.7%+22.9%+43.8%+16.6%+13.7%
NAK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NAK's 2.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs NAK's 68.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.42x2.19x2.31x2.11x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.98$72.09$223.89$71.25$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.73$35.15$87.84$30.98$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+68.5%+94.9%+84.8%+91.0%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.453.749.951.460.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7.9M12.2M1.3M2.9M12.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NAK as "Buy", FCX as "Buy", SCCO as "Hold", TECK as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.4% upside for FCX (target: $71) vs -36.3% for NAK (target: $1). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs TECK's 0.55%.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$1.30$71.44$156.17$64.50$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts541302648
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.9%+1.6%+0.5%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11156
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.60$2.96$0.50$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%0.0%+2.3%+0.2%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KO leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallSouthern Copper Corporation (SCCO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NAK vs FCX vs SCCO vs TECK vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NAK or FCX or SCCO or TECK or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger pick with 18.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NAK or FCX or SCCO or TECK or KO?

On trailing P/E, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the cheapest at 27.

2x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 45. 0x. On forward P/E, Teck Resources Limited is actually cheaper at 13. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 86x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NAK or FCX or SCCO or TECK or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

(NAK) delivered a total return of +270. 0%, compared to +65. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCCO returned +762. 4% versus KO's +121. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NAK or FCX or SCCO or TECK or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. 's 2. 42β — meaning NAK is approximately -1310% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NAK or FCX or SCCO or TECK or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is pulling ahead at 18.

6% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teck Resources Limited grew EPS 262. 8% year-over-year, compared to -182. 7% for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SCCO leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NAK or FCX or SCCO or TECK or KO?

Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus 0. 0% for NAK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NAK or FCX or SCCO or TECK or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 86x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) trades at 13. 3x forward P/E versus 26. 2x for Southern Copper Corporation — 12. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FCX: 4. 4% to $71. 44.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NAK or FCX or SCCO or TECK or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield), SCCO (1. 6% yield), FCX (0. 9% yield), TECK (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. NAK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NAK or FCX or SCCO or TECK or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, NAK: +514. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NAK and FCX and SCCO and TECK and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (NAK (Basic Materials) and FCX (Basic Materials) and SCCO (Basic Materials) and TECK (Basic Materials) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. FCX, SCCO, TECK, KO pay a dividend while NAK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.