Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
OKUR logo
OKUR
MEDP logo
MEDP
CRL logo
CRL
ICLR logo
ICLR
IQV logo
IQV
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OKUR vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR vs IQV vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OKUR
OnKure Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$57M
5Y Perf.-97.1%
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$13.35B
5Y Perf.+175.4%
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.03B
5Y Perf.-43.6%
ICLR
ICON Public Limited Company

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • IE
Market Cap$11.19B
5Y Perf.-32.6%
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$30.79B
5Y Perf.-22.7%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+108.5%

OKUR vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR vs IQV vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OKUR logoOKUR
MEDP logoMEDP
CRL logoCRL
ICLR logoICLR
IQV logoIQV
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$57M$13.35B$9.03B$11.19B$30.79B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$2.68B$4.03B$8.17B$16.63B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-44M$460M$-185M$489M$1.39B$57.05B
Gross Margin29.1%31.9%25.2%26.1%60.0%
Operating Margin21.0%11.8%11.0%13.9%25.9%
Forward P/E27.5x16.9x13.9x14.2x14.4x
Total Debt$549K$250M$3.07B$3.56B$16.17B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$59M$497M$214M$647M$1.98B$343.34B

OKUR vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR vs IQV vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OKUR
MEDP
CRL
ICLR
IQV
JPM
StockApr 21Jun 26Return
OnKure Therapeutics… (OKUR)1002.9-97.1%
Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP)100275.4+175.4%
Charles River Labor… (CRL)10056.4-43.6%
ICON Public Limited… (ICLR)10067.4-32.6%
IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)10077.3-22.7%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100208.5+108.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OKUR vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR vs IQV vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Medpace Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. OKUR and ICLR also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
OKUR
OnKure Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

OKUR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.34, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 10.28x
  • Beta 1.34, current ratio 10.28x
  • 84.4% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

MEDP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 21.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.1%
  • 15.8% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
  • +53.7% vs ICLR's -0.6%
  • 24.8% ROA vs OKUR's -41.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 6 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ICLR
ICON Public Limited Company
The Value Play

ICLR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (13.9x vs 16.9x)
Best for: value
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
The Value Pick

IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.35 vs MEDP's 0.86
Best for: valuation efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • 20.4% margin vs CRL's -4.6%
  • Beta 0.94 vs ICLR's 1.59
  • 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthOKUR logoOKUR84.4% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9%
ValueICLR logoICLRLower P/E (13.9x vs 16.9x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs CRL's -4.6%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs ICLR's 1.59
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MEDP logoMEDP+53.7% vs ICLR's -0.6%
Efficiency (ROA)MEDP logoMEDP24.8% ROA vs OKUR's -41.5%

OKUR vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR vs IQV vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OKUROnKure Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MEDPMedpace Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Oncology
29.5%$748M
Metabolic
29.4%$745M
Other
16.1%$409M
Central Nervous System
10.1%$255M
Cardiology
9.5%$239M
Antiviral And Anti Infective
5.3%$135M
CRLCharles River Laboratories International, Inc.
FY 2025
Discovery and Safety Assessment
59.8%$2.4B
Research Models and Services
21.1%$846M
Manufacturing Support
19.1%$766M
ICLRICON Public Limited Company
FY 2012
Clinical Research
92.2%$1.0B
Central Laboratory
7.8%$87M
IQVIQVIA Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Research And Development Solutions
54.5%$8.9B
Technology And Analytics Solutions
40.6%$6.6B
Contract Sales And Medical Solutions
4.8%$788M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

OKUR vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR vs IQV vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGIQV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and OKUR operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -4.6%. On growth, MEDP holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$2.7B$4.0B$8.2B$16.6B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$61M$577M$824M$1.5B$3.5B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$44M$460M-$185M$489M$1.4B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$51M$745M$391M$1.3B$2.7B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+29.1%+31.9%+25.2%+26.1%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+21.0%+11.8%+11.0%+13.9%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.2%-4.6%+6.0%+8.3%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+27.8%+9.7%+16.4%+16.1%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+26.5%+1.2%+3.5%+8.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.7%+16.6%-160.0%-38.9%+15.0%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ICLR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 68% valuation discount to ICLR's 50.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.57x vs MEDP's 0.96x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$57M$13.3B$9.0B$11.2B$30.8B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$1M$13.1B$11.9B$14.1B$45.0B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.95x30.59x-64.44x50.41x23.15x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.27.51x16.90x13.86x14.16x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.96x0.57x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple23.27x13.04x10.11x13.11x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.27x2.25x1.36x1.89x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.01x30.06x2.89x1.26x4.75x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.57x17.42x12.98x15.01x8.88x
ICLR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MEDP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-45 for OKUR. OKUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MEDP scores 6/9 vs OKUR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-45.3%+120.9%-5.7%+5.2%+22.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-41.5%+24.8%-2.5%+3.0%+4.7%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+154.9%+6.3%+6.2%+8.7%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-78.4%+65.7%+8.1%+7.5%+11.0%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9364545
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.55x0.95x0.39x2.44x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$59M-$247M$2.9B$2.9B$14.2B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$59M$497M$214M$647M$2.0B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$549,000$250M$3.1B$3.6B$16.2B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5448.00x4.29x3.83x3.10x0.74x
MEDP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MEDP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $26,044 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $359 for OKUR. Over the past 12 months, MEDP leads with a +53.7% total return vs ICLR's -0.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs OKUR's -63.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+41.9%-18.2%-7.4%-22.5%-19.5%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+47.4%+53.7%+23.5%-0.6%+14.0%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.2%+114.4%-8.7%-35.9%-14.4%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.4%+160.4%-47.2%-32.0%-25.8%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.2%+1581.7%+122.4%+120.9%+177.5%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-63.7%+28.9%-3.0%-13.8%-5.0%+33.6%
MEDP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICLR's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs ICLR's 69.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.34x1.04x1.39x1.59x1.16x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.38$628.92$228.88$211.00$247.05$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.91$294.07$143.06$66.57$153.01$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.1%+74.3%+81.9%+69.3%+73.5%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.866.260.867.354.459.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded210K365K767K1.2M1.5M7.0M
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: MEDP as "Hold", CRL as "Buy", ICLR as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.5% upside for IQV (target: $222) vs -0.6% for ICLR (target: $145). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricOKUR logoOKUROnKure Therapeuti…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$498.86$213.17$145.36$222.22$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts1937304461
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10215
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+6.9%+4.0%+6.7%+4.0%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). MEDP leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OKUR vs MEDP vs CRL vs ICLR vs IQV vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus ICON Public Limited Company at 50. 4x. On forward P/E, ICON Public Limited Company is actually cheaper at 13. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus Medpace Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) delivered a total return of +160. 4%, compared to -96. 4% for OnKure Therapeutics, Inc. (OKUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1582% versus OKUR's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 59β — meaning ICLR is approximately 69% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OnKure Therapeutics, Inc. (OKUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Medpace Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 21. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEDP leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 0. 0% for OKUR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Medpace Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) trades at 13. 9x forward P/E versus 27. 5x for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — 13. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IQV: 22. 5% to $222. 22.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. OKUR, MEDP, CRL, ICLR, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is OKUR or MEDP or CRL or ICLR or IQV or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), +1582% 10Y return). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEDP: +1582%, ICLR: +120. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OKUR and MEDP and CRL and ICLR and IQV and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (OKUR (Healthcare) and MEDP (Healthcare) and CRL (Healthcare) and ICLR (Healthcare) and IQV (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: OKUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICLR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while OKUR, MEDP, CRL, ICLR, IQV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.