Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PLBC logo
PLBC
BSVN logo
BSVN
KO logo
KO
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PLBC vs BSVN vs KO vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PLBC
Plumas Bancorp

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$398M
5Y Perf.+155.9%
BSVN
Bank7 Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$446M
5Y Perf.+328.0%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

PLBC vs BSVN vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PLBC logoPLBC
BSVN logoBSVN
KO logoKO
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$398M$446M$355.61B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$112M$137M$49.28B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$30M$43M$13.70B$57.05B
Gross Margin81.5%69.7%61.7%60.0%
Operating Margin35.4%41.4%29.3%25.9%
Forward P/E10.1x10.5x25.3x14.4x
Total Debt$148M$0.00$45.49B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$81M$245M$10.27B$343.34B

PLBC vs BSVN vs KO vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PLBC
BSVN
KO
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Plumas Bancorp (PLBC)100255.9+155.9%
Bank7 Corp. (BSVN)100428.0+328.0%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PLBC vs BSVN vs KO vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PLBC leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Bank7 Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. KO also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇PLBC emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
PLBC
Plumas Bancorp
The Banking Pick

PLBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 48.6%, EPS growth -5.4%
  • 5.7% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
  • 48.6% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9%
  • Lower P/E (10.1x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.97 vs 2.26
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
BSVN
Bank7 Corp.
The Banking Pick

BSVN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 2.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.64, current ratio 502.78x
  • PEG 0.61 vs KO's 2.26
  • Beta 0.64, yield 2.1%, current ratio 502.78x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends and efficiency.

  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs PLBC's 2.1%
  • 13.1% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.5%
Best for: dividends and efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Financial Play

JPM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPLBC logoPLBC48.6% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9%
ValuePLBC logoPLBCLower P/E (10.1x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.97 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsBSVN logoBSVN31.4% margin vs JPM's 20.4%
Stability / SafetyBSVN logoBSVNBeta 0.64 vs JPM's 0.94
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs PLBC's 2.1%
Momentum (1Y)PLBC logoPLBC+31.1% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.5%

PLBC vs BSVN vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PLBCPlumas Bancorp
FY 2025
Service
83.0%$3M
Bank Servicing
17.0%$641,000
BSVNBank7 Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

PLBC vs BSVN vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGJPM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — PLBC and BSVN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2503.2x PLBC's $112M. BSVN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JPM's 20.4%.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBSVN logoBSVNBank7 Corp.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$112M$137M$49.3B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$41M$58M$15.5B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$30M$43M$13.7B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$20M$36M$12.6B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+81.5%+69.7%+61.7%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+35.4%+41.4%+29.3%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+26.4%+31.4%+27.8%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.1%+26.4%+25.5%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.9%-3.4%+18.2%+16.0%
Evenly matched — PLBC and BSVN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BSVN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.3x trailing earnings, BSVN trades at a 62% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSVN offers better value at 0.61x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBSVN logoBSVNBank7 Corp.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$398M$446M$355.6B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$466M$202M$390.8B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.47x10.33x27.18x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.06x10.46x25.27x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.20x0.61x2.43x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.76x3.48x26.39x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.68x3.25x7.42x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.41x1.77x10.40x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.64x10.78x67.15x8.88x
BSVN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $13 for PLBC. PLBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.57x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs PLBC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBSVN logoBSVNBank7 Corp.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.3%+18.2%+41.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.5%+2.3%+13.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.2%+18.3%+15.8%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+14.1%+5.2%+17.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93575
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.57x1.33x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$67M-$245M$35.2B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$81M$245M$10.3B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$148M$0$45.5B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.85x1.39x10.70x0.74x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PLBC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $28,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,560 for KO. Over the past 12 months, PLBC leads with a +31.1% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBSVN logoBSVNBank7 Corp.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+30.3%+13.0%+20.3%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+31.1%+20.3%+17.2%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+62.0%+97.2%+47.0%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+110.2%+189.1%+65.6%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+574.9%+169.2%+121.1%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.5%+25.4%+13.7%+33.6%
PLBC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PLBC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLBC currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs BSVN's 92.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBSVN logoBSVNBank7 Corp.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.71x0.64x-0.20x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$57.00$50.10$84.04$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$39.70$37.56$65.35$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+92.8%+98.3%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.462.660.659.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded56K11K12.7M7.0M
Evenly matched — PLBC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PLBC as "Buy", BSVN as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.6% upside for BSVN (target: $57) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricPLBC logoPLBCPlumas BancorpBSVN logoBSVNBank7 Corp.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$61.50$57.00$86.13$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts334861
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.1%+2.1%+2.5%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises575615
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.18$0.98$2.04$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.3%+0.2%+3.9%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). BSVN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PLBC vs BSVN vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PLBC or BSVN or KO or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is the stronger pick with 48.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PLBC or BSVN or KO or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Bank7 Corp.

(BSVN) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Plumas Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank7 Corp. wins at 0. 61x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PLBC or BSVN or KO or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.

(BSVN) delivered a total return of +189. 1%, compared to +65. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLBC returned +574. 9% versus KO's +121. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PLBC or BSVN or KO or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 57% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PLBC or BSVN or KO or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) is pulling ahead at 48.

6% versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -7. 0% for Bank7 Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PLBC or BSVN or KO or JPM?

Bank7 Corp.

(BSVN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 20. 4% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSVN leads at 41. 4% versus 26. 0% for JPM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLBC leads at 80. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PLBC or BSVN or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 61x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSVN: 22. 6% to $57. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PLBC or BSVN or KO or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).

09

Is PLBC or BSVN or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, JPM: +465. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PLBC and BSVN and KO and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (PLBC (Financial Services) and BSVN (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PLBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; BSVN is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.