Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PNBK vs CZWI vs BWFG vs NECB vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
PNBK vs CZWI vs BWFG vs NECB vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $114M | $207M | $444M | $359M | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $61M | $90M | $208M | $156M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $14M | $35M | $44M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 53.5% | 54.7% | 51.6% | 65.9% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -19.1% | 7.0% | 23.3% | 39.8% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 0.7x | 11.8x | 10.3x | 8.3x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $52M | $180M | $75M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $186M | $119M | $225M | $81M | $10.27B |
PNBK vs CZWI vs BWFG vs NECB vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patriot National Ba… (PNBK) | 100 | 16.4 | -83.6% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| Bankwell Financial … (BWFG) | 100 | 349.9 | +249.9% |
| Northeast Community… (NECB) | 100 | 438.1 | +338.1% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PNBK vs CZWI vs BWFG vs NECB vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PNBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (0.7x vs 25.3x)
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs PNBK's 1.46
BWFG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 6.1%, EPS growth 261.8%
- PEG 0.24 vs CZWI's 2.32
- 6.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- +57.3% vs PNBK's -11.8%
NECB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and bank quality is your priority.
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs BWFG's 198.5%
- NIM 4.9% vs PNBK's 1.7%
- 28.4% margin vs PNBK's -19.2%
- 3.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 13.1% ROA vs PNBK's -1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -12.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.4% margin vs PNBK's -19.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs PNBK's 1.46 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.3% vs PNBK's -11.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs PNBK's -1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -12.8% |
PNBK vs CZWI vs BWFG vs NECB vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PNBK vs CZWI vs BWFG vs NECB vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NECB leads in 1 of 6 categories
PNBK leads 1 • KO leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • BWFG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NECB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 808.5x PNBK's $61M. NECB is the more profitable business, keeping 28.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PNBK's -19.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $61M | $90M | $208M | $156M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $9M | $53M | $63M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $14M | $35M | $44M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $11M | -$5M | $51M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | +54.7% | +51.6% | +65.9% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.1% | +7.0% | +23.3% | +39.8% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.2% | +16.0% | +16.9% | +28.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.6% | +12.4% | -2.4% | +32.5% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | +63.0% | +2.1% | +6.8% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PNBK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.0x trailing earnings, NECB trades at a 71% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NECB offers better value at 0.24x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $114M | $207M | $444M | $359M | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$56M | $140M | $398M | $353M | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.06x | 14.70x | 12.50x | 7.99x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.68x | 11.79x | 10.27x | 8.30x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.90x | 0.29x | 0.24x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.69x | 7.58x | 5.57x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.96x | 2.29x | 2.14x | 2.28x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 1.11x | 1.44x | 1.01x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.90x | 16.98x | 7.07x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-14 for PNBK. PNBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs PNBK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.5% | +7.8% | +12.2% | +13.1% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +2.2% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.8% | +2.0% | +8.0% | +12.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.1% | +0.6% | +4.4% | +16.2% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.60x | 0.21x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$170M | -$67M | -$45M | -$6M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $186M | $119M | $225M | $81M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $52M | $180M | $75M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.42x | 0.16x | 0.49x | 1.17x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CZWI and BWFG and NECB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NECB five years ago would be worth $24,194 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,162 for PNBK. Over the past 12 months, BWFG leads with a +57.3% total return vs PNBK's -11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs PNBK's -49.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -41.9% | +24.3% | +24.4% | +15.9% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.8% | +52.1% | +57.3% | +17.5% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.8% | +153.7% | +132.8% | +98.4% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | +69.0% | +111.5% | +141.9% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | +149.0% | +198.5% | +500.4% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.0% | +36.4% | +32.5% | +25.6% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NECB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PNBK's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NECB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs PNBK's 48.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 0.50x | 0.65x | 0.71x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.00 | $22.62 | $56.48 | $26.02 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.86 | $12.83 | $33.85 | $19.27 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.5% | +94.9% | +98.5% | +99.8% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.9 | 51.2 | 63.3 | 67.0 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 276K | 41K | 44K | 33K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NECB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", BWFG as "Buy", NECB as "Hold", KO as "Buy". For income investors, NECB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.75% vs BWFG's 1.44%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 3 | 1 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +1.4% | +3.8% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.37 | $0.80 | $0.98 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% | +0.3% | +0.4% | +0.2% |
NECB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PNBK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
PNBK vs CZWI vs BWFG vs NECB vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PNBK or CZWI or BWFG or NECB or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the stronger pick with 6. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (8. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PNBK or CZWI or BWFG or NECB or KO?
On trailing P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the cheapest at 8. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 24x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PNBK or CZWI or BWFG or NECB or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) delivered a total return of +141. 9%, compared to -88. 4% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NECB returned +500. 4% versus PNBK's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PNBK or CZWI or BWFG or NECB or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning PNBK is approximately -832% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PNBK or CZWI or BWFG or NECB or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is pulling ahead at 6. 1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to -7. 7% for Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PNBK or CZWI or BWFG or NECB or KO?
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 2% net margin versus -21. 9% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NECB leads at 39. 6% versus -21. 8% for PNBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NECB leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PNBK or CZWI or BWFG or NECB or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK) trades at 0. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 24. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — PNBK or CZWI or BWFG or NECB or KO?
In this comparison, NECB (3.
8% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), CZWI (1. 7% yield), BWFG (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. PNBK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PNBK or CZWI or BWFG or NECB or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, PNBK: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PNBK and CZWI and BWFG and NECB and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (PNBK (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and BWFG (Financial Services) and NECB (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PNBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; NECB is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. CZWI, BWFG, NECB, KO pay a dividend while PNBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.