Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PROV vs WAFD vs HOMB vs CVBF vs BANR vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
PROV vs WAFD vs HOMB vs CVBF vs BANR vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $109M | $2.85B | $5.58B | $2.88B | $2.28B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $60M | $1.39B | $1.37B | $644M | $819M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $243M | $475M | $209M | $195M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 67.8% | 52.8% | 77.3% | 79.7% | 79.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 16.2% | 22.4% | 43.8% | 43.7% | 29.5% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 15.4x | 11.4x | 11.5x | 14.7x | 10.9x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $213M | $1.82B | $935M | $991M | $373M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $53M | $657M | $667M | $108M | $183M | $10.27B |
PROV vs WAFD vs HOMB vs CVBF vs BANR vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provident Financial… (PROV) | 100 | 127.6 | +27.6% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 183.7 | +83.7% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 176.9 | +76.9% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PROV vs WAFD vs HOMB vs CVBF vs BANR vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PROV has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 3.3%
- Beta 0.21, yield 3.3%, current ratio 0.06x
- 2.5% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3%
- Beta 0.21 vs CVBF's 0.81
WAFD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +32.5% vs HOMB's +3.0%
HOMB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 21.8%, current ratio 0.13x
- PEG 0.87 vs CVBF's 4.64
- NIM 3.8% vs WAFD's 2.5%
- 34.6% margin vs PROV's 11.0%
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.8% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
BANR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.94 vs 2.26
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs BANR's 101.5%
- 13.1% ROA vs PROV's 0.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.5% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.94 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.6% margin vs PROV's 11.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs CVBF's 0.81 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.5% vs HOMB's +3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs PROV's 0.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.9% |
PROV vs WAFD vs HOMB vs CVBF vs BANR vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PROV vs WAFD vs HOMB vs CVBF vs BANR vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
HOMB leads 1 • PROV leads 0 • WAFD leads 0 • CVBF leads 0 • BANR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HOMB and CVBF each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 819.5x PROV's $60M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 34.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PROV's 11.0%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $60M | $1.4B | $1.4B | $644M | $819M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $277M | $618M | $294M | $253M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $243M | $475M | $209M | $195M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $215M | $311M | $217M | $248M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.8% | +52.8% | +77.3% | +79.7% | +79.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +22.4% | +43.8% | +43.7% | +29.5% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +17.5% | +34.6% | +32.5% | +23.8% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +15.5% | +22.6% | +33.7% | +30.3% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.2% | +46.3% | +26.0% | +11.1% | +11.2% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 57% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOMB offers better value at 0.89x vs WAFD's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $109M | $2.9B | $5.6B | $2.9B | $2.3B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $269M | $4.0B | $5.9B | $3.8B | $2.5B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.40x | 14.10x | 11.72x | 13.97x | 11.92x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.41x | 11.35x | 11.47x | 14.74x | 10.92x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.58x | 0.89x | 4.40x | 1.03x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.77x | 13.41x | 9.47x | 13.37x | 9.77x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 2.02x | 4.06x | 4.48x | 2.78x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 0.98x | 1.30x | 1.26x | 1.19x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.38x | 13.71x | 11.58x | 13.26x | 9.19x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $5 for PROV. BANR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PROV's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WAFD scores 7/9 vs CVBF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +8.0% | +11.4% | +9.3% | +10.3% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +0.9% | +2.1% | +1.4% | +1.2% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +3.9% | +8.7% | +6.8% | +7.7% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +5.7% | +11.5% | +9.3% | +10.1% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.66x | 0.60x | 0.22x | 0.43x | 0.19x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $160M | $1.2B | $268M | $883M | $190M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $53M | $657M | $667M | $108M | $183M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $213M | $1.8B | $935M | $991M | $373M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.47x | 0.48x | 1.47x | 2.12x | 1.11x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,522 for CVBF. Over the past 12 months, WAFD leads with a +32.5% total return vs HOMB's +3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVBF at 18.0% vs HOMB's 9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.8% | +17.1% | +2.7% | +14.8% | +9.3% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.5% | +32.5% | +3.0% | +16.3% | +11.1% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.9% | +37.6% | +31.2% | +64.4% | +59.7% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.2% | +29.5% | +22.1% | +15.2% | +35.1% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.8% | +91.9% | +57.7% | +66.9% | +101.5% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | +11.2% | +9.5% | +18.0% | +16.9% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WAFD and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVBF's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 0.66x | 0.66x | 0.81x | 0.67x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.42 | $37.10 | $30.83 | $21.48 | $69.83 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.95 | $26.31 | $25.50 | $17.95 | $57.05 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +99.9% | +91.6% | +98.8% | +96.3% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 63.8 | 63.7 | 60.1 | 60.0 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 525K | 1.4M | 1.6M | 218K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVBF and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PROV as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold", BANR as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -6.5% for PROV (target: $16). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs KO's 2.46%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $35.00 | $31.50 | $24.75 | $64.25 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 11 | 19 | 16 | 13 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +2.8% | +2.8% | +3.8% | +2.9% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 16 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | $1.05 | $0.80 | $0.82 | $1.96 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +3.6% | +1.5% | +2.8% | +1.5% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). HOMB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
PROV vs WAFD vs HOMB vs CVBF vs BANR vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PROV or WAFD or HOMB or CVBF or BANR or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.
(PROV) is the stronger pick with 2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PROV or WAFD or HOMB or CVBF or BANR or KO?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Banner Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Home Bancshares, Inc. wins at 0. 87x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PROV or WAFD or HOMB or CVBF or BANR or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to +15. 2% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus PROV's +25. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PROV or WAFD or HOMB or CVBF or BANR or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 0. 81β — meaning CVBF is approximately -507% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banner Corporation (BANR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 166% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PROV or WAFD or HOMB or CVBF or BANR or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.
(PROV) is pulling ahead at 2. 5% versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -12. 3% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PROV or WAFD or HOMB or CVBF or BANR or KO?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 6% net margin versus 10. 4% for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 34. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 14. 8% for PROV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PROV or WAFD or HOMB or CVBF or BANR or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 87x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Banner Corporation (BANR) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 16. 6% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — PROV or WAFD or HOMB or CVBF or BANR or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 2. 5% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO).
09Is PROV or WAFD or HOMB or CVBF or BANR or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CVBF: +66. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PROV and WAFD and HOMB and CVBF and BANR and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (PROV (Financial Services) and WAFD (Financial Services) and HOMB (Financial Services) and CVBF (Financial Services) and BANR (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PROV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.