Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
QTTB logo
QTTB
LLY logo
LLY
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

QTTB vs LLY vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
QTTB
Q32 Bio Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$162M
5Y Perf.-95.4%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.10T
5Y Perf.+590.1%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.22B
5Y Perf.+76.8%

QTTB vs LLY vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
QTTB logoQTTB
LLY logoLLY
KO logoKO
IndustryBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - GeneralBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$162M$1.10T$355.22B
Revenue (TTM)$54M$72.25B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$33M$25.27B$13.70B
Gross Margin99.5%83.5%61.7%
Operating Margin39.8%45.9%29.3%
Forward P/E5.2x31.7x25.2x
Total Debt$15M$42.50B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$48M$7.16B$10.27B

QTTB vs LLY vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

QTTB
LLY
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB)1004.6-95.4%
Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY)100690.1+590.1%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100176.8+76.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: QTTB vs LLY vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: QTTB leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Eli Lilly and Company is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇QTTB emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
QTTB
Q32 Bio Inc.
The Defensive Pick

QTTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.62, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 4.85x
  • 156.7% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
  • Lower P/E (5.2x vs 25.2x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
The Growth Play

LLY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 44.7%, EPS growth 96.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.7%
  • 15.2% 10Y total return vs KO's 120.9%
  • PEG 1.10 vs KO's 2.26
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.15, yield 2.5%
  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs LLY's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthQTTB logoQTTB156.7% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueQTTB logoQTTBLower P/E (5.2x vs 25.2x)
Quality / MarginsQTTB logoQTTB61.9% margin vs KO's 27.8%
Stability / SafetyLLY logoLLYBeta 0.53 vs QTTB's 0.62
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs LLY's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)QTTB logoQTTB+6.5% vs KO's +17.4%
Efficiency (ROA)QTTB logoQTTB53.3% ROA vs KO's 13.1%

QTTB vs LLY vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
QTTBQ32 Bio Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LLYEli Lilly and Company
FY 2025
Product
93.5%$61.0B
Collaboration and Other Revenue
6.5%$4.2B
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

QTTB vs LLY vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLQTTBLAGGINGKO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LLY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

LLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $72.2B annually — 1344.5x QTTB's $54M. QTTB is the more profitable business, keeping 61.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KO's 27.8%. On growth, LLY holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.LLY logoLLYEli Lilly and Com…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$54M$72.2B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$22M$34.7B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$33M$25.3B$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$27M$13.6B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+99.5%+83.5%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+39.8%+45.9%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+61.9%+35.0%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-51.0%+18.8%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+55.5%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+40.0%+169.9%+18.2%
LLY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

QTTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 5.2x trailing earnings, QTTB trades at a 90% valuation discount to LLY's 50.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LLY offers better value at 1.76x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.LLY logoLLYEli Lilly and Com…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$162M$1.10T$355.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$129M$1.13T$390.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.25x50.59x27.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.31.74x25.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.76x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.48x36.22x26.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.02x16.83x7.41x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.72x39.29x10.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF122.26x67.07x
QTTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

QTTB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

QTTB delivers a 2.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $41 for KO. QTTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LLY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LLY scores 8/9 vs QTTB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.LLY logoLLYEli Lilly and Com…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.3%+101.2%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+53.3%+22.7%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+41.8%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+26.8%+46.6%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9487
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.37x1.60x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$33M$35.3B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$48M$7.2B$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$15M$42.5B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense21.88x35.68x10.70x
QTTB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LLY five years ago would be worth $52,914 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $984 for QTTB. Over the past 12 months, QTTB leads with a +647.1% total return vs KO's +17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LLY at 38.3% vs QTTB's -14.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.LLY logoLLYEli Lilly and Com…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+269.2%+7.8%+20.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+647.1%+44.4%+17.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-37.0%+164.5%+46.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.2%+429.1%+63.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.2%+1522.5%+120.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-14.3%+38.3%+13.7%
LLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QTTB's 0.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs QTTB's 85.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.LLY logoLLYEli Lilly and Com…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.50x0.53x-0.15x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.85$1182.73$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.35$623.78$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.5%+98.2%+98.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.266.865.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded824K2.6M12.6M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: QTTB as "Hold", LLY as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.1% upside for LLY (target: $1266) vs 4.6% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.47% vs LLY's 0.52%.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.LLY logoLLYEli Lilly and Com…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.50$1266.17$86.29
# AnalystsCovering analysts84548
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1156
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$6.00$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.4%+0.2%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LLY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). QTTB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallQ32 Bio Inc. (QTTB)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

QTTB vs LLY vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is QTTB or LLY or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger pick with 44.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — QTTB or LLY or KO?

On trailing P/E, Q32 Bio Inc.

(QTTB) is the cheapest at 5. 2x versus Eli Lilly and Company at 50. 6x. On forward P/E, The Coca-Cola Company is actually cheaper at 25. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Eli Lilly and Company wins at 1. 10x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — QTTB or LLY or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) delivered a total return of +429.

1%, compared to -90. 2% for Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LLY returned +1522% versus QTTB's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — QTTB or LLY or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

15β versus Eli Lilly and Company's 0. 53β — meaning LLY is approximately -461% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 160% for Eli Lilly and Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — QTTB or LLY or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is pulling ahead at 44.

7% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Q32 Bio Inc. grew EPS 136. 8% year-over-year, compared to 23. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, QTTB leads at 100. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — QTTB or LLY or KO?

Q32 Bio Inc.

(QTTB) is the more profitable company, earning 55. 5% net margin versus 27. 3% for The Coca-Cola Company — meaning it keeps 55. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LLY leads at 45. 6% versus 28. 7% for KO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QTTB leads at 99. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is QTTB or LLY or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 10x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) trades at 25. 2x forward P/E versus 31. 7x for Eli Lilly and Company — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LLY: 9. 1% to $1266. 17.

08

Which pays a better dividend — QTTB or LLY or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield), LLY (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. QTTB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is QTTB or LLY or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

53), 0. 5% yield, +1522% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LLY: +1522%, QTTB: -96. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between QTTB and LLY and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (QTTB (Healthcare) and LLY (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: QTTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; LLY is a mega-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. LLY, KO pay a dividend while QTTB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.