Restaurants
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Telecommunications Services
Entertainment
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Entertainment | Telecommunications Services | Entertainment | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $216M | $180.41B | $81.73B | $416M | $908.57B | $341.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $282M | $97.26B | $125.28B | $2.09B | $280.33B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $11.22B | $18.60B | $-65M | $57.05B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 37.2% | 61.7% | 66.8% | 60.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | 15.5% | 15.3% | 4.3% | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 4.6x | 15.2x | 6.4x | 94.6x | 14.6x | 24.3x |
| Total Debt | $266M | $44.88B | $110.44B | $3.17B | $942.38B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $5.70B | $9.48B | $17M | $343.34B | $10.27B |
RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RCI Hospitality Hol… (RICK) | 100 | 204.0 | +104.0% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 93.2 | -6.8% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 57.5 | -42.5% |
| Dave & Buster's Ent… (PLAY) | 100 | 89.6 | -10.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 6 stocks, RICK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.4%, EPS growth 151.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.5%
- 3.4% revenue growth vs RICK's -5.5%
CMCSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 17 yrs, beta 0.08, yield 6.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.08, current ratio 0.88x
- PEG 0.34 vs KO's 2.17
- Beta 0.08, yield 6.0%, current ratio 0.88x
PLAY doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs KO's 115.0%
- +20.9% vs PLAY's -62.7%
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 27.8% margin vs PLAY's -3.1%
- 13.1% ROA vs PLAY's -1.6%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.4% revenue growth vs RICK's -5.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.4x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.34 vs 2.17 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs PLAY's -3.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.08 vs PLAY's 1.80, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.0% yield, 17-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.9% vs PLAY's -62.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs PLAY's -1.6%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.4% |
RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
CMCSA leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • RICK leads 0 • DIS leads 0 • PLAY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 995.4x RICK's $282M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLAY's -3.1%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $282M | $97.3B | $125.3B | $2.1B | $280.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $51M | $20.5B | $35.4B | $377M | $81.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $11.2B | $18.6B | -$65M | $57.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $7.1B | $18.1B | -$33M | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +37.2% | +61.7% | +66.8% | +60.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +15.5% | +15.3% | +4.3% | +25.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +11.5% | +14.8% | -3.1% | +20.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +7.3% | +14.5% | -1.6% | +36.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.3% | +6.5% | +5.3% | -1.5% | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -111.1% | -29.8% | -32.6% | -74.2% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCSA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.2x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 84% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMCSA offers better value at 0.22x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $216M | $180.4B | $81.7B | $416M | $908.6B | $341.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $449M | $219.6B | $182.7B | $3.6B | $1.51T | $376.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.98x | 15.17x | 4.16x | -8.54x | 16.22x | 26.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.63x | 15.22x | 6.39x | 94.62x | 14.60x | 24.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.22x | — | 0.92x | 2.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.75x | 11.46x | 4.95x | 9.27x | 18.52x | 25.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.77x | 1.91x | 0.66x | 0.20x | 3.25x | 7.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 1.64x | 0.84x | 4.54x | 2.51x | 9.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.19x | 17.90x | 3.73x | — | 9.01x | 64.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-53 for PLAY. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLAY's 34.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | +9.8% | +19.5% | -53.1% | +15.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | +5.6% | +6.9% | -1.6% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +6.9% | +8.2% | +2.4% | +4.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +8.5% | +8.9% | +2.9% | +8.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 0.39x | 1.13x | 34.71x | 2.60x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $233M | $39.2B | $101.0B | $3.1B | $599.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $5.7B | $9.5B | $17M | $343.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $266M | $44.9B | $110.4B | $3.2B | $942.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.39x | 9.95x | 6.84x | 0.46x | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,012 for PLAY. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +20.9% total return vs PLAY's -62.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs PLAY's -34.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.3% | -7.1% | -21.8% | -29.9% | +0.8% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.7% | -10.8% | -30.7% | -62.7% | +20.9% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.3% | +18.5% | -35.9% | -71.6% | +138.8% | +39.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.5% | -38.3% | -50.5% | -69.9% | +135.5% | +65.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.5% | +13.5% | +1.2% | -73.0% | +481.2% | +115.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.7% | +5.8% | -13.8% | -34.3% | +33.7% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JPM and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLAY's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs PLAY's 33.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 0.82x | 0.08x | 1.80x | 0.87x | -0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.37 | $124.69 | $36.66 | $35.53 | $338.09 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.76 | $92.19 | $22.39 | $9.65 | $269.72 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.3% | +83.3% | +61.2% | +33.6% | +96.2% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.2 | 47.5 | 28.9 | 44.2 | 72.1 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 7.4M | 29.3M | 1.8M | 7.4M | 13.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CMCSA and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RICK as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", CMCSA as "Buy", PLAY as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 246.7% upside for RICK (target: $98) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, CMCSA offers the higher dividend yield at 6.00% vs DIS's 0.96%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $98.00 | $139.20 | $31.48 | $17.33 | $339.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 63 | 60 | 20 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +1.0% | +6.0% | — | +1.8% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $1.00 | $1.35 | — | $5.95 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.5% | +1.9% | +8.8% | +0.4% | +3.8% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CMCSA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the stronger pick with 3.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 2x trailing P/E (6. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.
2x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Comcast Corporation wins at 0. 34x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -69. 9% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus PLAY's -73. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
23β versus Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning PLAY is approximately -869% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 35% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is pulling ahead at 3.
4% versus -5. 5% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 272. 7% year-over-year, compared to -195. 9% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DIS leads at 4. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -2. 3% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 5. 0% for PLAY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLAY leads at 85. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 34x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 94. 6x for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — 90. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RICK: 246. 7% to $98. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO?
In this comparison, CMCSA (6.
0% yield), KO (2. 6% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield), RICK (1. 0% yield), DIS (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. PLAY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, PLAY: -73. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RICK and DIS and CMCSA and PLAY and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (RICK (Consumer Cyclical) and DIS (Communication Services) and CMCSA (Communication Services) and PLAY (Communication Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RICK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PLAY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. RICK, DIS, CMCSA, JPM, KO pay a dividend while PLAY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.