Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
RICK logo
RICK
DIS logo
DIS
CMCSA logo
CMCSA
PLAY logo
PLAY
JPM logo
JPM
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs JPM vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RICK
RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$216M
5Y Perf.+104.0%
DIS
The Walt Disney Company

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$180.41B
5Y Perf.-6.8%
CMCSA
Comcast Corporation

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$81.73B
5Y Perf.-42.5%
PLAY
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$416M
5Y Perf.-10.4%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$908.57B
5Y Perf.+245.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$341.71B
5Y Perf.+77.7%

RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RICK logoRICK
DIS logoDIS
CMCSA logoCMCSA
PLAY logoPLAY
JPM logoJPM
KO logoKO
IndustryRestaurantsEntertainmentTelecommunications ServicesEntertainmentBanks - DiversifiedBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$216M$180.41B$81.73B$416M$908.57B$341.71B
Revenue (TTM)$282M$97.26B$125.28B$2.09B$280.33B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$-7M$11.22B$18.60B$-65M$57.05B$13.70B
Gross Margin55.2%37.2%61.7%66.8%60.0%61.7%
Operating Margin12.3%15.5%15.3%4.3%25.9%29.3%
Forward P/E4.6x15.2x6.4x94.6x14.6x24.3x
Total Debt$266M$44.88B$110.44B$3.17B$942.38B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$34M$5.70B$9.48B$17M$343.34B$10.27B

RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs JPM vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RICK
DIS
CMCSA
PLAY
JPM
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
RCI Hospitality Hol… (RICK)100204.0+104.0%
The Walt Disney Com… (DIS)10093.2-6.8%
Comcast Corporation (CMCSA)10057.5-42.5%
Dave & Buster's Ent… (PLAY)10089.6-10.4%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100345.8+245.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100177.7+77.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs JPM vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CMCSA leads in 3 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. DIS and JPM also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇CMCSA emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
RICK
RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 6 stocks, RICK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
DIS
The Walt Disney Company
The Growth Play

DIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 3.4%, EPS growth 151.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.5%
  • 3.4% revenue growth vs RICK's -5.5%
Best for: growth exposure
CMCSA
Comcast Corporation
The Income Pick

CMCSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 17 yrs, beta 0.08, yield 6.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.08, current ratio 0.88x
  • PEG 0.34 vs KO's 2.17
  • Beta 0.08, yield 6.0%, current ratio 0.88x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
PLAY
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
The Communication Services Pick

PLAY doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 481.2% 10Y total return vs KO's 115.0%
  • +20.9% vs PLAY's -62.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 27.8% margin vs PLAY's -3.1%
  • 13.1% ROA vs PLAY's -1.6%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.4%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthDIS logoDIS3.4% revenue growth vs RICK's -5.5%
ValueCMCSA logoCMCSALower P/E (6.4x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.34 vs 2.17
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs PLAY's -3.1%
Stability / SafetyCMCSA logoCMCSABeta 0.08 vs PLAY's 1.80, lower leverage
DividendsCMCSA logoCMCSA6.0% yield, 17-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)JPM logoJPM+20.9% vs PLAY's -62.7%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs PLAY's -1.6%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.4%

RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

RICKRCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Alcoholic Beverages
43.7%$122M
Service
34.7%$97M
Food And Merchandise
14.3%$40M
Other Revenues
7.3%$20M
DISThe Walt Disney Company
FY 2025
Admission
20.7%$11.7B
Advertising
19.6%$11.1B
Retail and wholesale sales of merchandise, food and beverage
17.0%$9.6B
Resort and vacations
16.3%$9.2B
Other Revenue
8.3%$4.7B
License
6.8%$3.9B
TV/SVOD distribution licensing
6.7%$3.8B
Other (1)
4.6%$2.6B
CMCSAComcast Corporation
FY 2025
Residential Connectivity And Platforms Segment
57.2%$70.7B
Media Segment
21.9%$27.1B
Studios Segment
9.1%$11.3B
Business Services Connectivity Segment
8.3%$10.2B
Theme Parks
8.0%$9.8B
Corporate and Other
2.5%$3.1B
Intersegment Eliminations
-6.9%$-8,535,000,000
PLAYDave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
FY 2025
Entertainment
62.9%$1.3B
Food and Beverage
37.1%$779M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGPLAY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 995.4x RICK's $282M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLAY's -3.1%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricRICK logoRICKRCI Hospitality H…DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…CMCSA logoCMCSAComcast Corporati…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$282M$97.3B$125.3B$2.1B$280.3B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$51M$20.5B$35.4B$377M$81.4B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$7M$11.2B$18.6B-$65M$57.0B$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$39M$7.1B$18.1B-$33M$100.9B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.2%+37.2%+61.7%+66.8%+60.0%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+12.3%+15.5%+15.3%+4.3%+25.9%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.3%+11.5%+14.8%-3.1%+20.4%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+14.0%+7.3%+14.5%-1.6%+36.0%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.3%+6.5%+5.3%-1.5%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-111.1%-29.8%-32.6%-74.2%+16.0%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CMCSA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 4.2x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 84% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMCSA offers better value at 0.22x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricRICK logoRICKRCI Hospitality H…DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…CMCSA logoCMCSAComcast Corporati…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$216M$180.4B$81.7B$416M$908.6B$341.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$449M$219.6B$182.7B$3.6B$1.51T$376.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS22.98x15.17x4.16x-8.54x16.22x26.12x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.4.63x15.22x6.39x94.62x14.60x24.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.22x0.92x2.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.75x11.46x4.95x9.27x18.52x25.45x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.77x1.91x0.66x0.20x3.25x7.13x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.96x1.64x0.84x4.54x2.51x9.99x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.19x17.90x3.73x9.01x64.52x
CMCSA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-53 for PLAY. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLAY's 34.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricRICK logoRICKRCI Hospitality H…DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…CMCSA logoCMCSAComcast Corporati…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.6%+9.8%+19.5%-53.1%+15.9%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.1%+5.6%+6.9%-1.6%+1.3%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.5%+6.9%+8.2%+2.4%+4.5%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.8%+8.5%+8.9%+2.9%+8.9%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9687657
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.02x0.39x1.13x34.71x2.60x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$233M$39.2B$101.0B$3.1B$599.0B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$34M$5.7B$9.5B$17M$343.3B$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$266M$44.9B$110.4B$3.2B$942.4B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.39x9.95x6.84x0.46x0.74x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,012 for PLAY. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +20.9% total return vs PLAY's -62.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs PLAY's -34.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRICK logoRICKRCI Hospitality H…DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…CMCSA logoCMCSAComcast Corporati…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+21.3%-7.1%-21.8%-29.9%+0.8%+16.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-27.7%-10.8%-30.7%-62.7%+20.9%+17.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-62.3%+18.5%-35.9%-71.6%+138.8%+39.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-53.5%-38.3%-50.5%-69.9%+135.5%+65.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+188.5%+13.5%+1.2%-73.0%+481.2%+115.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-27.7%+5.8%-13.8%-34.3%+33.7%+11.7%
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — JPM and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLAY's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs PLAY's 33.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRICK logoRICKRCI Hospitality H…DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…CMCSA logoCMCSAComcast Corporati…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.33x0.82x0.08x1.80x0.87x-0.23x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$41.37$124.69$36.66$35.53$338.09$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$20.76$92.19$22.39$9.65$269.72$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+68.3%+83.3%+61.2%+33.6%+96.2%+94.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.247.528.944.272.149.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded47K7.4M29.3M1.8M7.4M13.6M
Evenly matched — JPM and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CMCSA and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: RICK as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", CMCSA as "Buy", PLAY as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 246.7% upside for RICK (target: $98) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, CMCSA offers the higher dividend yield at 6.00% vs DIS's 0.96%.

MetricRICK logoRICKRCI Hospitality H…DIS logoDISThe Walt Disney C…CMCSA logoCMCSAComcast Corporati…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$98.00$139.20$31.48$17.33$339.75$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts36360206148
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%+1.0%+6.0%+1.8%+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises721701556
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.28$1.00$1.35$5.95$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.5%+1.9%+8.8%+0.4%+3.8%+0.2%
Evenly matched — CMCSA and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CMCSA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RICK vs DIS vs CMCSA vs PLAY vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the stronger pick with 3.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 2x trailing P/E (6. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO?

On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.

2x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Comcast Corporation wins at 0. 34x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -69. 9% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus PLAY's -73. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

23β versus Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning PLAY is approximately -869% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 35% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is pulling ahead at 3.

4% versus -5. 5% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 272. 7% year-over-year, compared to -195. 9% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DIS leads at 4. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -2. 3% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 5. 0% for PLAY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLAY leads at 85. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 34x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 94. 6x for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — 90. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RICK: 246. 7% to $98. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO?

In this comparison, CMCSA (6.

0% yield), KO (2. 6% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield), RICK (1. 0% yield), DIS (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. PLAY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is RICK or DIS or CMCSA or PLAY or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, PLAY: -73. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RICK and DIS and CMCSA and PLAY and JPM and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (RICK (Consumer Cyclical) and DIS (Communication Services) and CMCSA (Communication Services) and PLAY (Communication Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: RICK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PLAY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. RICK, DIS, CMCSA, JPM, KO pay a dividend while PLAY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.