Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
RYAAY vs LUV vs ULCC vs SNCY vs DAL vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
RYAAY vs LUV vs ULCC vs SNCY vs DAL vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $31.49B | $22.33B | $1.44B | $876M | $54.25B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.59B | $28.88B | $3.80B | $1.14B | $63.36B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.17B | $817M | $-366M | $40M | $5.01B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 25.2% | 16.5% | 31.2% | 66.3% | 24.5% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | 3.4% | -11.4% | 7.1% | 9.2% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 15.8x | 17.0x | — | 20.5x | 15.2x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.49B | $5.98B | $5.46B | $592M | $21.08B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.77B | $3.23B | $671M | $145M | $4.31B | $10.27B |
RYAAY vs LUV vs ULCC vs SNCY vs DAL vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ryanair Holdings plc (RYAAY) | 100 | 129.1 | +29.1% |
| Southwest Airlines … (LUV) | 100 | 72.4 | -27.6% |
| Frontier Group Hold… (ULCC) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
| Sun Country Airline… (SNCY) | 100 | 38.8 | -61.2% |
| Delta Air Lines, In… (DAL) | 100 | 177.0 | +77.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 153.1 | +53.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RYAAY vs LUV vs ULCC vs SNCY vs DAL vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RYAAY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 1.6%
- Rev growth 12.2%, EPS growth 40.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 14.8%, current ratio 0.90x
- Beta 1.26, yield 1.6%, current ratio 0.90x
LUV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 6 stocks, ULCC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SNCY doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
DAL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (15.2x vs 25.3x)
- +71.5% vs RYAAY's +8.8%
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs DAL's 120.5%
- 27.8% margin vs ULCC's -9.6%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs RYAAY's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- 13.1% ROA vs ULCC's -5.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs -2.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.2% revenue growth vs ULCC's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.2x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs ULCC's -9.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs ULCC's 2.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs RYAAY's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +71.5% vs RYAAY's +8.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs ULCC's -5.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs -2.3% |
RYAAY vs LUV vs ULCC vs SNCY vs DAL vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RYAAY vs LUV vs ULCC vs SNCY vs DAL vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
SNCY leads 1 • RYAAY leads 1 • DAL leads 1 • LUV leads 0 • ULCC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.4B annually — 55.7x SNCY's $1.1B. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ULCC's -9.6%. On growth, LUV holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.6B | $28.9B | $3.8B | $1.1B | $63.4B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.7B | $2.5B | -$300M | $180M | $8.9B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.2B | $817M | -$366M | $40M | $5.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | -$401M | -$481M | $72M | $3.8B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +16.5% | +31.2% | +66.3% | +24.5% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +3.4% | -11.4% | +7.1% | +9.2% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +2.8% | -9.6% | +3.5% | +7.9% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | -1.4% | -12.6% | +6.3% | +6.1% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.2% | +12.8% | +8.8% | +3.6% | +2.9% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.0% | +2.7% | -5.2% | -34.8% | +44.2% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SNCY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.8x trailing earnings, DAL trades at a 81% valuation discount to LUV's 57.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SNCY's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KO's 26.4x.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $31.5B | $22.3B | $1.4B | $876M | $54.2B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30.0B | $25.1B | $6.2B | $1.3B | $71.0B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.72x | 57.56x | -10.43x | 16.84x | 10.84x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.78x | 17.03x | — | 20.50x | 15.17x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.73x | 12.62x | — | 6.64x | 8.59x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.74x | 0.80x | 0.39x | 0.78x | 0.86x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.75x | 3.18x | 2.93x | 1.42x | 2.62x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.01x | — | — | 10.43x | 14.12x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RYAAY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-89 for ULCC. RYAAY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ULCC's 11.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RYAAY scores 8/9 vs ULCC's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.6% | +10.7% | -88.6% | +6.4% | +24.1% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.3% | +2.8% | -5.3% | +2.5% | +6.2% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.3% | +3.0% | -2.3% | +6.9% | +12.0% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.1% | +2.2% | -3.2% | +8.3% | +11.4% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.75x | 11.13x | 0.95x | 1.02x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.3B | $2.8B | $4.8B | $447M | $16.8B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.8B | $3.2B | $671M | $145M | $4.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $6.0B | $5.5B | $592M | $21.1B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.62x | -29.29x | 1.12x | 9.69x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DAL five years ago would be worth $18,477 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,305 for ULCC. Over the past 12 months, DAL leads with a +71.5% total return vs RYAAY's +8.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAL at 28.3% vs ULCC's -12.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.2% | +11.0% | +37.0% | +11.6% | +20.8% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.8% | +42.3% | +66.9% | +41.1% | +71.5% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.7% | +52.0% | -33.5% | -19.9% | +111.0% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.2% | -15.9% | -66.9% | -59.4% | +84.8% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.3% | +19.4% | -66.8% | -55.6% | +120.5% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.4% | +15.0% | -12.7% | -7.1% | +28.3% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DAL and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ULCC's 2.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAL currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs SNCY's 72.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.55x | 2.79x | 1.94x | 1.93x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $74.24 | $54.89 | $6.66 | $22.29 | $83.83 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $53.14 | $28.98 | $3.02 | $10.14 | $45.28 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.3% | +82.8% | +94.0% | +72.5% | +99.1% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 60.8 | 60.7 | 45.6 | 60.9 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 6.1M | 5.6M | 581K | 7.8M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RYAAY as "Buy", LUV as "Hold", ULCC as "Hold", SNCY as "Buy", DAL as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.1% upside for RYAAY (target: $79) vs -4.2% for ULCC (target: $6). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs DAL's 0.81%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $78.50 | $48.74 | $6.00 | $21.00 | $86.45 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 45 | 13 | 11 | 44 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +1.6% | — | — | +0.8% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | $0.72 | — | — | $0.67 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +11.4% | 0.0% | +2.3% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). SNCY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RYAAY vs LUV vs ULCC vs SNCY vs DAL vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RYAAY or LUV or ULCC or SNCY or DAL or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ryanair Holdings plc (RYAAY) is the stronger pick with 12.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC). Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (15. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ryanair Holdings plc (RYAAY) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RYAAY or LUV or ULCC or SNCY or DAL or KO?
On trailing P/E, Delta Air Lines, Inc.
(DAL) is the cheapest at 10. 8x versus Southwest Airlines Co. at 57. 6x. On forward P/E, Delta Air Lines, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RYAAY or LUV or ULCC or SNCY or DAL or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Delta Air Lines, Inc.
(DAL) delivered a total return of +84. 8%, compared to -66. 9% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus ULCC's -66. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RYAAY or LUV or ULCC or SNCY or DAL or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 79β — meaning ULCC is approximately -1491% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ryanair Holdings plc (RYAAY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 11% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RYAAY or LUV or ULCC or SNCY or DAL or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ryanair Holdings plc (RYAAY) is pulling ahead at 12.
2% versus -1. 4% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Delta Air Lines, Inc. grew EPS 43. 7% year-over-year, compared to -257. 9% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RYAAY leads at 13. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RYAAY or LUV or ULCC or SNCY or DAL or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -3. 7% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -4. 0% for ULCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNCY leads at 66. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RYAAY or LUV or ULCC or SNCY or DAL or KO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Delta Air Lines, Inc.
(DAL) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RYAAY: 30. 1% to $78. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — RYAAY or LUV or ULCC or SNCY or DAL or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), RYAAY (1. 6% yield), LUV (1. 6% yield), DAL (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. ULCC, SNCY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RYAAY or LUV or ULCC or SNCY or DAL or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC) carries a higher beta of 2. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, ULCC: -66. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RYAAY and LUV and ULCC and SNCY and DAL and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (RYAAY (Industrials) and LUV (Industrials) and ULCC (Industrials) and SNCY (Industrials) and DAL (Industrials) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RYAAY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LUV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ULCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SNCY is a small-cap deep-value stock; DAL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. RYAAY, LUV, DAL, KO pay a dividend while ULCC, SNCY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.