Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
SMBK logo
SMBK
CADE logo
CADE
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SMBK vs CADE vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SMBK
SmartFinancial, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$777M
5Y Perf.+181.0%
CADE
Cadence Bank

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.85B
5Y Perf.+85.2%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%

SMBK vs CADE vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SMBK logoSMBK
CADE logoCADE
KO logoKO
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$777M$7.85B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$316M$2.84B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$50M$530M$13.70B
Gross Margin61.0%60.3%61.7%
Operating Margin19.4%23.8%29.3%
Forward P/E12.5x12.1x25.3x
Total Debt$102M$34M$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$464M$1.73B$10.27B

SMBK vs CADE vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SMBK
CADE
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK)100281.0+181.0%
Cadence Bank (CADE)100185.2+85.2%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SMBK vs CADE vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SMBK and KO are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SMBK
SmartFinancial, Inc.
The Banking Pick

SMBK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 10.9%, EPS growth 39.3%
  • 198.2% 10Y total return vs CADE's 123.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 18.4%, current ratio 0.22x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CADE
Cadence Bank
The Banking Pick

CADE is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 3.1% vs SMBK's 2.8%
  • 32.4% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
Best for: bank quality
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
  • 27.8% margin vs SMBK's 15.9%
  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs SMBK's 0.7%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCADE logoCADE32.4% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueSMBK logoSMBKLower P/E (12.5x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.96 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs SMBK's 15.9%
Stability / SafetySMBK logoSMBKBeta 0.77 vs CADE's 1.35
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs SMBK's 0.7%
Momentum (1Y)SMBK logoSMBK+41.8% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs SMBK's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.7%

SMBK vs CADE vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SMBKSmartFinancial, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CADECadence Bank

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

SMBK vs CADE vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGCADE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 155.8x SMBK's $316M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMBK's 15.9%.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…CADE logoCADECadence BankKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$316M$2.8B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$70M$722M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$50M$530M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$57M$508M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+61.0%+60.3%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.4%+23.8%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.9%+18.7%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.0%+17.9%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+42.1%-6.9%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SMBK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.2x trailing earnings, CADE trades at a 44% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SMBK offers better value at 1.18x vs CADE's 4.01x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…CADE logoCADECadence BankKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$777M$7.8B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$414M$6.1B$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.26x15.20x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.50x12.12x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.18x4.01x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.93x7.00x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.46x2.70x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.39x1.40x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.10x10.10x67.15x
SMBK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $9 for CADE. CADE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs CADE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…CADE logoCADECadence BankKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.5%+9.1%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+1.1%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.7%+6.7%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.6%+10.4%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9667
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.01x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$363M-$1.7B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$464M$1.7B$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$102M$34M$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.51x0.66x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SMBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SMBK five years ago would be worth $19,258 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,845 for CADE. Over the past 12 months, SMBK leads with a +41.8% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CADE at 29.7% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…CADE logoCADECadence BankKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+24.8%-1.8%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+41.8%+38.9%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+103.9%+118.3%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+92.6%+58.4%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+198.2%+123.9%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.8%+29.7%+13.7%
SMBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SMBK and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CADE's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMBK currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs CADE's 90.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…CADE logoCADECadence BankKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.77x1.35x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$45.63$46.74$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$30.95$29.66$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.6%+90.1%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.146.760.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded67K80.6M12.7M
Evenly matched — SMBK and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SMBK as "Hold", CADE as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for SMBK (target: $49) vs -5.6% for CADE (target: $40). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs SMBK's 0.71%.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…CADE logoCADECadence BankKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$49.00$39.75$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts92048
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+2.3%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01356
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.32$0.98$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.5%+0.2%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SMBK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SMBK vs CADE vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SMBK or CADE or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cadence Bank (CADE) is the stronger pick with 32.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Cadence Bank (CADE) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SMBK or CADE or KO?

On trailing P/E, Cadence Bank (CADE) is the cheapest at 15.

2x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Cadence Bank is actually cheaper at 12. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SmartFinancial, Inc. wins at 0. 96x versus Cadence Bank's 3. 20x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SMBK or CADE or KO?

Over the past 5 years, SmartFinancial, Inc.

(SMBK) delivered a total return of +92. 6%, compared to +58. 4% for Cadence Bank (CADE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMBK returned +198. 2% versus KO's +121. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SMBK or CADE or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Cadence Bank's 1. 35β — meaning CADE is approximately -775% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cadence Bank (CADE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SMBK or CADE or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cadence Bank (CADE) is pulling ahead at 32.

4% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SmartFinancial, Inc. grew EPS 39. 3% year-over-year, compared to -5. 1% for Cadence Bank. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SMBK or CADE or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 15. 9% for SmartFinancial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 19. 4% for SMBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SMBK or CADE or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 96x versus Cadence Bank's 3. 20x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Cadence Bank (CADE) trades at 12. 1x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 13. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMBK: 7. 8% to $49. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SMBK or CADE or KO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 7% for SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK).

09

Is SMBK or CADE or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CADE: +123. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SMBK and CADE and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (SMBK (Financial Services) and CADE (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SMBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CADE is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.