Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
SMBK logo
SMBK
CADE logo
CADE
KO logo
KO
HOMB logo
HOMB
IBCP logo
IBCP
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SMBK vs CADE vs KO vs HOMB vs IBCP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SMBK
SmartFinancial, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$777M
5Y Perf.+181.0%
CADE
Cadence Bank

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.85B
5Y Perf.+85.2%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.58B
5Y Perf.+83.7%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$730M
5Y Perf.+138.9%

SMBK vs CADE vs KO vs HOMB vs IBCP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SMBK logoSMBK
CADE logoCADE
KO logoKO
HOMB logoHOMB
IBCP logoIBCP
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$777M$7.85B$355.61B$5.58B$730M
Revenue (TTM)$316M$2.84B$49.28B$1.37B$310M
Net Income (TTM)$50M$530M$13.70B$475M$69M
Gross Margin61.0%60.3%61.7%77.3%69.1%
Operating Margin19.4%23.8%29.3%43.8%26.2%
Forward P/E12.5x12.1x25.3x11.5x10.0x
Total Debt$102M$34M$45.49B$935M$117M
Cash & Equiv.$464M$1.73B$10.27B$667M$52M

SMBK vs CADE vs KO vs HOMB vs IBCPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SMBK
CADE
KO
HOMB
IBCP
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK)100281.0+181.0%
Cadence Bank (CADE)100185.2+85.2%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB)100183.7+83.7%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100238.9+138.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SMBK vs CADE vs KO vs HOMB vs IBCP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HOMB leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. SmartFinancial, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. CADE, KO, and IBCP also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇HOMB emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
SMBK
SmartFinancial, Inc.
The Banking Pick

SMBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 10.9%, EPS growth 39.3%
  • 198.2% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 194.4%
  • +41.8% vs HOMB's +3.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CADE
Cadence Bank
The Banking Pick

CADE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 32.4% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3%
Best for: growth
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Niche Pick

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 13.1% ROA vs SMBK's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.7%
Best for: efficiency
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
  • PEG 0.87 vs CADE's 3.20
  • NIM 3.8% vs SMBK's 2.8%
  • Lower P/E (11.5x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.87 vs 2.26
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
  • Beta 0.72, yield 2.9%, current ratio 370.62x
  • 2.9% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCADE logoCADE32.4% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3%
ValueHOMB logoHOMBLower P/E (11.5x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.87 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsHOMB logoHOMB34.6% margin vs SMBK's 15.9%
Stability / SafetyHOMB logoHOMBBeta 0.66 vs CADE's 1.35
DividendsIBCP logoIBCP2.9% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)SMBK logoSMBK+41.8% vs HOMB's +3.0%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs SMBK's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.7%

SMBK vs CADE vs KO vs HOMB vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SMBKSmartFinancial, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CADECadence Bank

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
HOMBHome Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Financial Service, Other
53.7%$47M
Deposit Account
46.3%$40M
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M

SMBK vs CADE vs KO vs HOMB vs IBCP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSMBKLAGGINGCADE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 159.1x IBCP's $310M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 34.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMBK's 15.9%.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…CADE logoCADECadence BankKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$316M$2.8B$49.3B$1.4B$310M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$70M$722M$15.5B$618M$89M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$50M$530M$13.7B$475M$69M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$57M$508M$12.6B$311M$70M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+61.0%+60.3%+61.7%+77.3%+69.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.4%+23.8%+29.3%+43.8%+26.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.9%+18.7%+27.8%+34.6%+22.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.0%+17.9%+25.5%+22.6%+22.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+42.1%-6.9%+18.2%+26.0%+2.3%
HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.9x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 60% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOMB offers better value at 0.89x vs CADE's 4.01x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…CADE logoCADECadence BankKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Market CapShares × price$777M$7.8B$355.6B$5.6B$730M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$414M$6.1B$390.8B$5.9B$795M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.26x15.20x27.18x11.72x10.85x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.50x12.12x25.27x11.47x9.99x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.18x4.01x2.43x0.89x2.06x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.93x7.00x26.39x9.47x9.78x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.46x2.70x7.42x4.06x2.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.39x1.40x10.40x1.30x1.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.10x10.10x67.15x11.58x10.41x
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $9 for CADE. CADE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs HOMB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…CADE logoCADECadence BankKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.5%+9.1%+41.1%+11.4%+14.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+1.1%+13.1%+2.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.7%+6.7%+15.8%+8.7%+10.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.6%+10.4%+17.3%+11.5%+2.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966768
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.01x1.33x0.22x0.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$363M-$1.7B$35.2B$268M$65M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$464M$1.7B$10.3B$667M$52M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$102M$34M$45.5B$935M$117M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.51x0.66x10.70x1.47x0.91x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SMBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SMBK five years ago would be worth $19,258 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,212 for HOMB. Over the past 12 months, SMBK leads with a +41.8% total return vs HOMB's +3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CADE at 29.7% vs HOMB's 9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…CADE logoCADECadence BankKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+24.8%-1.8%+20.3%+2.7%+12.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+41.8%+38.9%+17.2%+3.0%+16.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+103.9%+118.3%+47.0%+31.2%+110.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+92.6%+58.4%+65.6%+22.1%+80.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+198.2%+123.9%+121.1%+57.7%+194.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.8%+29.7%+13.7%+9.5%+28.1%
SMBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SMBK and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CADE's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMBK currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs CADE's 90.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…CADE logoCADECadence BankKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.77x1.35x-0.20x0.66x0.72x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$45.63$46.74$84.04$30.83$39.16
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$30.95$29.66$65.35$25.50$29.63
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.6%+90.1%+98.3%+91.6%+90.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.146.760.663.761.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded67K80.6M12.7M1.4M135K
Evenly matched — SMBK and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KO and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SMBK as "Hold", CADE as "Hold", KO as "Buy", HOMB as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.5% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs -5.6% for CADE (target: $40). For income investors, IBCP offers the higher dividend yield at 2.92% vs SMBK's 0.71%.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…CADE logoCADECadence BankKO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$49.00$39.75$86.13$31.50$38.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts92048197
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+2.3%+2.5%+2.8%+2.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises013561511
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.32$0.98$2.04$0.80$1.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.5%+0.2%+1.5%+1.7%
Evenly matched — KO and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HOMB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). IBCP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallSmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SMBK vs CADE vs KO vs HOMB vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SMBK or CADE or KO or HOMB or IBCP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cadence Bank (CADE) is the stronger pick with 32.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SMBK or CADE or KO or HOMB or IBCP?

On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.

9x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Home Bancshares, Inc. wins at 0. 87x versus Cadence Bank's 3. 20x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SMBK or CADE or KO or HOMB or IBCP?

Over the past 5 years, SmartFinancial, Inc.

(SMBK) delivered a total return of +92. 6%, compared to +22. 1% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMBK returned +198. 2% versus HOMB's +57. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SMBK or CADE or KO or HOMB or IBCP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Cadence Bank's 1. 35β — meaning CADE is approximately -775% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cadence Bank (CADE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SMBK or CADE or KO or HOMB or IBCP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cadence Bank (CADE) is pulling ahead at 32.

4% versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SmartFinancial, Inc. grew EPS 39. 3% year-over-year, compared to -5. 1% for Cadence Bank. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SMBK or CADE or KO or HOMB or IBCP?

Home Bancshares, Inc.

(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 6% net margin versus 15. 9% for SmartFinancial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 34. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 43. 8% versus 19. 4% for SMBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOMB leads at 77. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SMBK or CADE or KO or HOMB or IBCP more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 87x versus Cadence Bank's 3. 20x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 11. 5% to $31. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SMBK or CADE or KO or HOMB or IBCP?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 0. 7% for SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK).

09

Is SMBK or CADE or KO or HOMB or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CADE: +123. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SMBK and CADE and KO and HOMB and IBCP?

These companies operate in different sectors (SMBK (Financial Services) and CADE (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and HOMB (Financial Services) and IBCP (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SMBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CADE is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.