Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
SMBK logo
SMBK
SFBS logo
SFBS
HOMB logo
HOMB
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SMBK vs SFBS vs HOMB vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SMBK
SmartFinancial, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$777M
5Y Perf.+181.0%
SFBS
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.50B
5Y Perf.+130.4%
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.58B
5Y Perf.+83.7%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

SMBK vs SFBS vs HOMB vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SMBK logoSMBK
SFBS logoSFBS
HOMB logoHOMB
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$777M$4.50B$5.58B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$316M$1.02B$1.37B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$50M$277M$475M$57.05B
Gross Margin61.0%51.8%77.3%60.0%
Operating Margin19.4%33.6%43.8%25.9%
Forward P/E12.5x12.9x11.5x14.4x
Total Debt$102M$1.51B$935M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$464M$95M$667M$343.34B

SMBK vs SFBS vs HOMB vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SMBK
SFBS
HOMB
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK)100281.0+181.0%
ServisFirst Bancsha… (SFBS)100230.4+130.4%
Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB)100183.7+83.7%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SMBK vs SFBS vs HOMB vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HOMB leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. SmartFinancial, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. SFBS also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇HOMB emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
SMBK
SmartFinancial, Inc.
The Banking Pick

SMBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 10.9%, EPS growth 39.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 18.4%, current ratio 0.22x
  • 10.9% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3%
  • +41.8% vs HOMB's +3.0%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
SFBS
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

SFBS is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.

  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs SMBK's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs SMBK's 0.4%
Best for: quality and efficiency
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
  • Beta 0.66, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.13x
  • NIM 3.8% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • Lower P/E (11.5x vs 12.9x), PEG 0.87 vs 1.28
Best for: income & stability and defensive
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs SFBS's 260.6%
  • PEG 0.81 vs SFBS's 1.28
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSMBK logoSMBK10.9% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3%
ValueHOMB logoHOMBLower P/E (11.5x vs 12.9x), PEG 0.87 vs 1.28
Quality / MarginsSFBS logoSFBSEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs SMBK's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyHOMB logoHOMBBeta 0.66 vs SFBS's 1.06, lower leverage
DividendsHOMB logoHOMB2.8% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs SFBS's 1.6%
Momentum (1Y)SMBK logoSMBK+41.8% vs HOMB's +3.0%
Efficiency (ROA)SFBS logoSFBSEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs SMBK's 0.4%

SMBK vs SFBS vs HOMB vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SMBKSmartFinancial, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SFBSServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Deposit Account
46.3%$12M
Credit Card
32.4%$8M
Mortgage Banking
21.3%$5M
HOMBHome Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Financial Service, Other
53.7%$47M
Deposit Account
46.3%$40M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

SMBK vs SFBS vs HOMB vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHOMBLAGGINGSFBS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 886.1x SMBK's $316M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 34.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMBK's 15.9%.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…SFBS logoSFBSServisFirst Bancs…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$316M$1.0B$1.4B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$70M$346M$618M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$50M$277M$475M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$57M$351M$311M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+61.0%+51.8%+77.3%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.4%+33.6%+43.8%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.9%+27.2%+34.6%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.0%+34.5%+22.6%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+42.1%+32.8%+26.0%+16.0%
HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HOMB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.7x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 28% valuation discount to SFBS's 16.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOMB offers better value at 0.89x vs SFBS's 1.61x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…SFBS logoSFBSServisFirst Bancs…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$777M$4.5B$5.6B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$414M$5.9B$5.9B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.26x16.28x11.72x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.50x12.87x11.47x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.18x1.61x0.89x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.93x17.29x9.47x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.46x4.43x4.06x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.39x2.43x1.30x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.10x12.89x11.58x8.88x
HOMB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HOMB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $10 for SMBK. SMBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SFBS scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…SFBS logoSFBSServisFirst Bancs…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.5%+15.8%+11.4%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+1.6%+2.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.7%+7.3%+8.7%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.6%+4.5%+11.5%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96865
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.81x0.22x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$363M$1.4B$268M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$464M$95M$667M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$102M$1.5B$935M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.51x0.75x1.47x0.74x
HOMB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,212 for HOMB. Over the past 12 months, SMBK leads with a +41.8% total return vs HOMB's +3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs HOMB's 9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…SFBS logoSFBSServisFirst Bancs…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+24.8%+15.8%+2.7%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+41.8%+12.8%+3.0%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+103.9%+92.8%+31.2%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+92.6%+27.6%+22.1%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+198.2%+260.6%+57.7%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.8%+24.5%+9.5%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SMBK and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFBS's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMBK currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs SFBS's 90.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…SFBS logoSFBSServisFirst Bancs…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.77x1.06x0.66x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$45.63$90.64$30.83$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$30.95$67.20$25.50$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.6%+90.9%+91.6%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.165.163.759.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded67K211K1.4M7.0M
Evenly matched — SMBK and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

HOMB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SMBK as "Hold", SFBS as "Buy", HOMB as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.5% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, HOMB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.85% vs SMBK's 0.71%.

MetricSMBK logoSMBKSmartFinancial, I…SFBS logoSFBSServisFirst Bancs…HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$49.00$90.00$31.50$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts961961
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+1.6%+2.8%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises011515
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.32$1.34$0.80$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.5%+3.9%
HOMB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HOMB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallHome Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SMBK vs SFBS vs HOMB vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SMBK or SFBS or HOMB or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SmartFinancial, Inc.

(SMBK) is the stronger pick with 10. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SMBK or SFBS or HOMB or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.

(HOMB) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. at 16. 3x. On forward P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 28x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SMBK or SFBS or HOMB or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +22. 1% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus HOMB's +57. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SMBK or SFBS or HOMB or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.

(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 06β — meaning SFBS is approximately 61% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SMBK or SFBS or HOMB or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SmartFinancial, Inc.

(SMBK) is pulling ahead at 10. 9% versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SmartFinancial, Inc. grew EPS 39. 3% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SMBK or SFBS or HOMB or JPM?

Home Bancshares, Inc.

(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 6% net margin versus 15. 9% for SmartFinancial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 34. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 43. 8% versus 19. 4% for SMBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOMB leads at 77. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SMBK or SFBS or HOMB or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 28x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 11. 5% to $31. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SMBK or SFBS or HOMB or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 0. 7% for SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK).

09

Is SMBK or SFBS or HOMB or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, SFBS: +260. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SMBK and SFBS and HOMB and JPM?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.