Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SSBI vs BSVN vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
SSBI vs BSVN vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $90M | $446M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $59M | $137M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $43M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 55.8% | 69.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | 41.4% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 10.5x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $0.00 | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $66M | $245M | $343.34B |
SSBI vs BSVN vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summit State Bank (SSBI) | 100 | 165.0 | +65.0% |
| Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) | 100 | 428.0 | +328.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SSBI vs BSVN vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SSBI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +35.7% vs BSVN's +20.3%
BSVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 2.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, current ratio 502.78x
- PEG 0.61 vs JPM's 0.81
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs BSVN's 169.2%
- 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs SSBI's -5.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs SSBI's -5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.61 vs 0.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SSBI's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs JPM's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.7% vs BSVN's +20.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SSBI's 0.4% |
SSBI vs BSVN vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SSBI vs BSVN vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSVN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 4764.1x SSBI's $59M. BSVN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SSBI's 11.5%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $59M | $137M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $58M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $43M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $36M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.8% | +69.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +41.4% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +31.4% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +26.4% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.1% | -3.4% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SSBI and BSVN each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, BSVN trades at a 35% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSVN offers better value at 0.61x vs JPM's 0.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $90M | $446M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30M | $202M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.32x | 10.33x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.46x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.61x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.37x | 3.48x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.53x | 3.25x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 1.77x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.71x | 10.78x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN delivers a 18.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $7 for SSBI. SSBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SSBI scores 6/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.9% | +18.2% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +2.3% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.6% | +18.3% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +5.2% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | — | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$60M | -$245M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $66M | $245M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $0 | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 1.39x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $28,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,051 for SSBI. Over the past 12 months, SSBI leads with a +35.7% total return vs BSVN's +20.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs SSBI's -3.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.9% | +13.0% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.7% | +20.3% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.8% | +97.2% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.5% | +189.1% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.1% | +169.2% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.4% | +25.4% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
SSBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SSBI is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SSBI currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs BSVN's 92.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.03x | 0.64x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.00 | $50.10 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.40 | $37.56 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.1% | +92.8% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 62.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 11K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BSVN and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BSVN as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.6% upside for BSVN (target: $57) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, BSVN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.10% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $57.00 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.98 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +3.9% |
BSVN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SSBI vs BSVN vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SSBI or BSVN or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Summit State Bank (SSBI). Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SSBI or BSVN or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, Bank7 Corp. is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank7 Corp. wins at 0. 61x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SSBI or BSVN or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) delivered a total return of +189. 1%, compared to +10. 5% for Summit State Bank (SSBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus SSBI's +73. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SSBI or BSVN or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Summit State Bank (SSBI) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
03β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -3182% more volatile than SSBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Summit State Bank (SSBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SSBI or BSVN or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -5. 2% for Summit State Bank (SSBI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Summit State Bank grew EPS 262. 9% year-over-year, compared to -7. 0% for Bank7 Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SSBI or BSVN or JPM?
Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 11. 6% for Summit State Bank — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSVN leads at 41. 4% versus 15. 2% for SSBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BSVN leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SSBI or BSVN or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 61x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSVN: 22. 6% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SSBI or BSVN or JPM?
In this comparison, BSVN (2.
1% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. SSBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SSBI or BSVN or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Summit State Bank (SSBI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
03)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SSBI: +73. 1%, JPM: +465. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SSBI and BSVN and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BSVN, JPM pay a dividend while SSBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.