Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
USCB logo
USCB
NBTB logo
NBTB
IBCP logo
IBCP
FIS logo
FIS
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

USCB vs NBTB vs IBCP vs FIS vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
USCB
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$357M
5Y Perf.+83.6%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+38.2%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$730M
5Y Perf.+68.7%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-73.7%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+111.3%

USCB vs NBTB vs IBCP vs FIS vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
USCB logoUSCB
NBTB logoNBTB
IBCP logoIBCP
FIS logoFIS
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology ServicesBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$357M$2.52B$730M$20.26B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$152M$902M$310M$11.66B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$26M$169M$69M$2.67B$57.05B
Gross Margin58.1%73.6%69.1%37.6%60.0%
Operating Margin23.6%24.3%26.2%17.9%25.9%
Forward P/E9.8x11.5x10.0x6.2x14.4x
Total Debt$91M$327M$117M$4.01B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$82M$185M$52M$599M$343.34B

USCB vs NBTB vs IBCP vs FIS vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

USCB
NBTB
IBCP
FIS
JPM
StockJul 21Jun 26Return
USCB Financial Hold… (USCB)100183.6+83.6%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100138.2+38.2%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100168.7+68.7%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10026.3-73.7%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100211.3+111.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: USCB vs NBTB vs IBCP vs FIS vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. NBT Bancorp Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. JPM also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
USCB
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

USCB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
  • 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3%
Best for: growth exposure
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 3.3% vs JPM's 2.2%
Best for: bank quality
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
  • PEG 0.26 vs IBCP's 1.90
  • Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 194.4%
  • +21.8% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNBTB logoNBTB10.4% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs USCB's 17.2%
Stability / SafetyFIS logoFISBeta 0.61 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
Momentum (1Y)JPM logoJPM+21.8% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs USCB's 1.0%, ROIC 6.0% vs 7.8%

USCB vs NBTB vs IBCP vs FIS vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
USCBUSCB Financial Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

USCB vs NBTB vs IBCP vs FIS vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFISLAGGINGIBCP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FIS leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1843.3x USCB's $152M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USCB's 17.2%.

MetricUSCB logoUSCBUSCB Financial Ho…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …FIS logoFISFidelity National…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$152M$902M$310M$11.7B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$36M$241M$89M$4.1B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$26M$169M$69M$2.7B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$43M$225M$70M$2.8B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+58.1%+73.6%+69.1%+37.6%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.6%+24.3%+26.2%+17.9%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.2%+18.8%+22.1%+22.9%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+27.9%+24.9%+22.6%+23.9%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-79.4%+39.5%+2.3%+30.6%+16.0%
FIS leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.9x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 79% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), USCB offers better value at 0.58x vs FIS's 2.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricUSCB logoUSCBUSCB Financial Ho…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …FIS logoFISFidelity National…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$357M$2.5B$730M$20.3B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$365M$2.7B$795M$23.7B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.04x14.47x10.85x52.27x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.76x11.54x9.99x6.24x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.58x2.06x2.06x2.14x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.04x11.03x9.78x6.50x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.35x2.90x2.32x1.90x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.69x1.29x1.47x1.46x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.40x11.49x10.41x7.21x8.88x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — USCB and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricUSCB logoUSCBUSCB Financial Ho…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …FIS logoFISFidelity National…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.9%+9.5%+14.2%+18.4%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.0%+1.1%+1.3%+7.5%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.8%+7.9%+10.2%+6.0%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.8%+2.4%+2.6%+6.6%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967865
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.43x0.17x0.23x0.29x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$8M$142M$65M$3.4B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$82M$185M$52M$599M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$91M$327M$117M$4.0B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.58x1.05x0.91x21.16x0.74x
Evenly matched — USCB and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricUSCB logoUSCBUSCB Financial Ho…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …FIS logoFISFidelity National…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+8.8%+17.6%+12.0%-38.9%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+20.6%+18.3%+16.4%-49.4%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+97.7%+48.5%+110.4%-18.9%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+88.5%+44.4%+80.9%-67.3%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+88.5%+108.5%+194.4%-25.6%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+25.5%+14.1%+28.1%-6.8%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricUSCB logoUSCBUSCB Financial Ho…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …FIS logoFISFidelity National…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.70x0.76x0.72x0.61x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.79$48.27$39.16$82.74$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$15.57$39.20$29.63$37.91$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.1%+99.8%+90.6%+47.4%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.263.161.230.859.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded58K266K135K5.6M7.0M
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FIS and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: USCB as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", FIS as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricUSCB logoUSCBUSCB Financial Ho…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …FIS logoFISFidelity National…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$24.00$46.00$38.00$62.88$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts31073761
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.2%+3.0%+2.9%+4.2%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises21311115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.43$1.43$1.03$1.63$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+9.7%+0.4%+1.7%+7.0%+3.9%
Evenly matched — FIS and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallFidelity National Informati… (FIS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

USCB vs NBTB vs IBCP vs FIS vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is USCB or NBTB or IBCP or FIS or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. (USCB) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — USCB or NBTB or IBCP or FIS or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.

9x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 90x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — USCB or NBTB or IBCP or FIS or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — USCB or NBTB or IBCP or FIS or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 55% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — USCB or NBTB or IBCP or FIS or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — USCB or NBTB or IBCP or FIS or JPM?

Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more profitable company, earning 21.

7% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is USCB or NBTB or IBCP or FIS or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 90x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — USCB or NBTB or IBCP or FIS or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).

09

Is USCB or NBTB or IBCP or FIS or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

72), 2. 9% yield, +194. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +194. 4%, NBTB: +108. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between USCB and NBTB and IBCP and FIS and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (USCB (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and IBCP (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: USCB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.