Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
VABK vs NTRS vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Banks - Diversified
VABK vs NTRS vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Asset Management | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $244M | $32.31B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $83M | $14.30B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $1.74B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 69.0% | 56.5% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 28.9% | 16.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 16.1x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $16.43B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $61.13B | $343.34B |
VABK vs NTRS vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia National B… (VABK) | 100 | 178.2 | +78.2% |
| Northern Trust Corp… (NTRS) | 100 | 219.7 | +119.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VABK vs NTRS vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VABK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 16.2%, current ratio 3.53x
- Beta 0.48, yield 3.1%, current ratio 3.53x
NTRS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +62.8% vs JPM's +21.8%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs NTRS's 183.6%
- PEG 0.81 vs VABK's 3.36
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 16.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NTRS's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs NTRS's 1.07, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.8% vs JPM's +21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NTRS's 0.4% |
VABK vs NTRS vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VABK vs NTRS vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VABK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3363.8x VABK's $83M. VABK is the more profitable business, keeping 23.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTRS's 12.1%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $83M | $14.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $3.2B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $1.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $21M | $4.7B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.0% | +56.5% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.9% | +16.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +12.1% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | +33.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.0% | +7.1% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NTRS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.7x trailing earnings, VABK trades at a 36% valuation discount to NTRS's 19.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs VABK's 3.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $244M | $32.3B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $268M | -$12.4B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.68x | 19.95x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.08x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.36x | 2.02x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.13x | -3.85x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.93x | 2.26x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.32x | 2.54x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.76x | 5.92x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VABK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $11 for VABK. VABK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VABK scores 6/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | +13.4% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +6.0% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.6% | +9.0% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 1.27x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | -$44.7B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $61.1B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $16.4B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.94x | 0.38x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTRS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,088 for VABK. Over the past 12 months, NTRS leads with a +62.8% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRS at 35.6% vs VABK's 17.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.2% | +26.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.1% | +62.8% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.9% | +149.4% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.9% | +62.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.5% | +183.6% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.4% | +35.6% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VABK and NTRS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VABK is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTRS's 1.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTRS currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs VABK's 92.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 1.07x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.58 | $175.11 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.48 | $107.08 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.6% | +99.6% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.0 | 57.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 1.0M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VABK and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NTRS as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -11.8% for NTRS (target: $154). For income investors, VABK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.12% vs NTRS's 1.80%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $153.75 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 35 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +1.8% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.40 | $3.14 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.9% | +3.9% |
VABK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NTRS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
VABK vs NTRS vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VABK or NTRS or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VABK or NTRS or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) is the cheapest at 12.
7x versus Northern Trust Corporation at 19. 9x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Northern Trust Corporation's 1. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VABK or NTRS or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +50. 9% for Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus VABK's +146. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VABK or NTRS or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
48β versus Northern Trust Corporation's 1. 07β — meaning NTRS is approximately 123% more volatile than VABK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VABK or NTRS or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Virginia National Bankshares Corporation grew EPS 12. 7% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for Northern Trust Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VABK or NTRS or JPM?
Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
1% net margin versus 12. 1% for Northern Trust Corporation — meaning it keeps 23. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VABK leads at 28. 9% versus 16. 3% for NTRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VABK leads at 69. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VABK or NTRS or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Northern Trust Corporation's 1. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 16. 1x for Northern Trust Corporation — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — VABK or NTRS or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 1. 8% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS).
09Is VABK or NTRS or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
48), 3. 1% yield, +146. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VABK: +146. 5%, NTRS: +183. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VABK and NTRS and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VABK is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.