Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 55.3x · EV/EBITDA 35.0x · ROE 6.2%. (2015–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.9B | $2.7B | $1.0B | $1.3B | $504M | $1.9B | $1.7B | $353M | $195M | $79M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $4.4B | $2.2B | $782M | $1.2B | $335M | $1.3B | $1.7B | $312M | $177M | $66M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 55.33 | 28.80 | 9.87 | 16.84 | 13.07 | 49.00 | 90.27 | 18.64 | 30.25 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.39 | 2.95 | 1.28 | 2.27 | 1.30 | 7.15 | 10.99 | 3.28 | 2.61 | 2.16 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.64 | 1.38 | 0.91 | 1.37 | 0.62 | 2.29 | 8.27 | 3.63 | 3.73 | 1.98 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | 14.29 | — | — | — | — | 42.65 | 40.32 | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 6.56 | — | — | — | — | 37.55 | 28.23 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.43 | 1.00 | 2.12 | 0.86 | 5.14 | 10.85 | 2.91 | 2.38 | 1.82 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 34.97 | 17.43 | 4.86 | 11.40 | 5.21 | 32.49 | 75.36 | 16.82 | 25.75 | 68.40 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 40.18 | 15.42 | 4.58 | 9.96 | 4.86 | 30.44 | 83.80 | 17.56 | 27.41 | 94.88 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 11.17 | — | — | — | — | 37.74 | 36.67 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 44.4% | 44.4% | 50.1% | 49.5% | 47.2% | 44.2% | 44.4% | 47.1% | 46.2% | 47.2% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | 12.1% | 12.1% | 19.3% | 17.2% | 15.2% | 14.9% | 13.7% | 16.5% | 8.7% | 1.9% | 12.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.4% | 10.4% | 13.2% | 13.9% | 10.1% | 14.5% | 12.0% | 17.6% | 8.8% | -0.9% | 3.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 6.2% | 6.2% | 10.2% | 8.9% | 4.8% | 7.4% | 12.3% | 25.3% | 14.3% | -1.5% | 41.5% |
| ROA | 4.0% | 4.0% | 6.2% | 5.7% | 3.4% | 5.4% | 6.7% | 11.8% | 7.7% | -0.6% | 2.7% |
| ROIC | 7.0% | 7.0% | 13.2% | 9.7% | 9.5% | 12.2% | 13.3% | 29.2% | 15.7% | 4.3% | — |
| ROCE | 6.6% | 6.6% | 13.7% | 10.5% | 7.0% | 7.1% | 10.7% | 16.1% | 12.6% | 1.9% | 17.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 1.92 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.41 | 2.41 | 1.17 | 0.95 | 1.23 | 0.95 | 2.22 | 0.95 | 1.37 | 5.26 | 1.30 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.24 | -0.20 | -0.09 | -0.21 | -0.64 | -0.10 | -0.42 | -0.34 | -0.32 | -2.15 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -3.68 | -3.68 | -1.36 | -0.80 | -2.62 | -12.75 | -0.96 | -2.19 | -2.57 | -12.95 | -1.45 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | -3.12 | — | — | — | — | -4.91 | -3.65 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 20.44 | 20.44 | 41.06 | 44.35 | 41.70 | 57.28 | 20.65 | 23.88 | 12.99 | 2.53 | 19.28 |
Net cash position: cash ($766M) exceeds total debt ($303M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.27 | 3.27 | 2.31 | 2.35 | 2.43 | 4.63 | 2.53 | 3.71 | 2.08 | 2.88 | 2.36 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.33 | 2.33 | 1.38 | 1.26 | 1.44 | 3.57 | 1.67 | 2.87 | 1.24 | 2.18 | 1.68 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.57 | 1.57 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 0.85 | 2.87 | 0.97 | 1.09 | 0.59 | 0.81 | 0.59 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.31 | 0.42 | 0.37 | 0.31 | 0.25 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.72 | 0.54 | 0.62 |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.66 | 0.98 | 1.27 | 1.04 | 1.25 | 1.20 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 223.91 | 200.16 | 213.14 | 199.53 | 176.51 | 154.09 | 114.38 | 137.68 | 292.48 | 237.22 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 8.1% | 8.1% | 6.7% | 5.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.8% | 3.5% | 10.1% | 5.9% | 7.7% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.4% | 3.3% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 7.0% | — | — | — | — | 2.3% | 2.5% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $67M | $66M | $65M | $65M | $65M | $64M | $57M | $54M | $45M | $24M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 11 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ACMR stock.
ACM Research, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 55.3x. The historical average is 32.1x. This places it at the 88th percentile of its historical range.
ACM Research, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 35.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 28.6x.
ACM Research, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 6.2%. The historical average is 12.9%.
Based on historical data, ACM Research, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 55.3x. This is at the 88th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ACM Research, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.15% with a payout ratio of 8.1%.
ACM Research, Inc. has 44.4% gross margin and 12.1% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
ACM Research, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.4x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
China concentration and trade policy
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Geopolitical Discount Embedded in Multiples
ACM Research trades at 58.7x trailing P/E and 37.3x EV/EBITDA, a premium to US peers but a discount to its growth, implying the market prices in China-specific risks. According to recent financial data, forward P/E of 40.3x suggests expectations of continued acceleration.
The forward P/E of 40.3x implies the market expects earnings to grow roughly 46% over the next year, aligning with the 36% revenue growth reported in Q2 2026. However, the PEG of 1.65 suggests that the growth is not fully rewarded, likely due to the perceived geopolitical overhang. Compared to Camtek's 159x P/E and Onto's 119x, ACMR appears cheaper on a growth-adjusted basis, but the discount may reflect the higher risk of export controls disrupting its China-centric revenue base. Investors should monitor whether the valuation re-rates as diversification into ECP and advanced packaging reduces concentration risk.
Margin Expansion Tempered by Mix Shift
Gross margin dipped to 46.0% in Q2 2026 from 48.5% a year earlier, while operating margin expanded to 17.0% from 14.7%, reflecting operating leverage. As reported in financial statements, net margin surged to 30.4% but was likely boosted by one-time tax benefits.
The gross margin decline is consistent with the mix shift toward lower-margin ECP and furnace tools, which grew 168% and 153% respectively, but the operating margin improvement indicates that revenue growth is outpacing fixed cost increases. The net margin of 30.4% is unsustainable as it likely includes a tax benefit; normalizing for this, net margin would be closer to 15%, still above the 13.8% reported in Q2 2025. This suggests that core profitability is improving, but investors should adjust for non-recurring items to gauge true earning power.
Return on Capital Still Subdued
ROIC has remained in the low single digits, at 2.3% in Q2 2026, despite a 36% revenue surge, indicating that capital intensity is rising faster than returns. Based on reported figures, ROE improved to 4.0% but remains below the cost of equity.
The low ROIC of 2.3% is partly due to the massive cash pile of $990.6 million, which earns minimal returns, and the heavy investment in working capital and PPE. While the company is growing rapidly, the return on invested capital is not yet reflecting the scale benefits, as asset turnover is only 0.09x. This suggests that the company is in a heavy investment phase, and investors should expect ROIC to improve as revenue scales and working capital normalizes. The 93% increase in equity, driven by retained earnings, has not yet translated into proportional returns.
Working Capital Drag Intensifies
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 480 days in Q2 2026 from 547 days a year earlier, but remains extremely high, driven by DSO of 184 days and DIO of 437 days. According to recent financial statements, negative operating cash flow of $6.4 million underscores the strain.
The CCC of 480 days is a red flag, as it indicates that cash is tied up in receivables and inventory for over a year. DSO of 184 days suggests that customers, likely Chinese fabs, are taking extended payment terms, possibly due to financing constraints. DIO of 437 days reflects the buildup of inventory to support rapid growth and potential supply chain disruptions. While the company has a fortress balance sheet to absorb this, the negative FCF margin of -24.4% in Q2 2026 highlights the risk that growth is consuming cash faster than it generates it. Investors should monitor whether the company can tighten credit terms and reduce inventory as it matures.
Minimal Debt, But Rising Absolute Levels
Debt-to-equity remains negligible at 0.15, but total debt increased to $349 million, and D/EBITDA rose to 5.68 in Q2 2026 from 3.80 a year earlier. Interest coverage of 66.9x indicates ample comfort, though the trend warrants monitoring.
The low D/E ratio of 0.15 and high interest coverage of 66.9x suggest that debt service is not a concern. However, the absolute debt level has risen, and D/EBITDA has increased from 3.80 to 5.68 over the past year, indicating that EBITDA growth has not kept pace with debt accumulation. This is likely due to the company borrowing to fund its expansion, but the fortress cash position of $990.6 million provides a significant buffer. The risk is not insolvency but rather the opportunity cost of holding low-yielding cash while borrowing, which could weigh on returns.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens Further
Current ratio improved to 3.66 in Q2 2026 from 2.45 a year earlier, with quick ratio at 2.66, indicating a robust liquidity position. As reported in financial statements, cash and equivalents of $990.6 million provide ample coverage for short-term obligations.
The current ratio of 3.66 and quick ratio of 2.66 suggest that ACMR can easily meet its short-term liabilities, even if inventory becomes difficult to liquidate. The high cash balance, much of which is held at the subsidiary level in China, may not be fully accessible for US-based capital returns, but it does provide a cushion against operational disruptions. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a sudden halt in shipments due to export controls, the company could likely sustain operations for several quarters without external financing. However, the negative operating cash flow in Q2 2026 indicates that the liquidity buffer is being tested by working capital needs.
Misapplied Metric: P/E on Distorted Earnings
The trailing P/E of 58.7x is misleading because net income in Q2 2026 was inflated by a tax benefit, making the ratio appear cheaper than the underlying earnings power. According to financial statements, normalized net margin is closer to 15%, not 30.4%.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for ACMR is the P/E, as the company's net income is subject to significant volatility from tax items and stock-based compensation. In Q2 2026, net margin jumped to 30.4% due to a likely one-time tax benefit, which artificially lowers the P/E. Investors should instead use EV/EBITDA or a normalized P/E based on operating earnings, as these better reflect the company's recurring profitability. Additionally, given the heavy working capital requirements, price-to-cash-flow may be more relevant, but with negative FCF in recent quarters, EV/Sales might be a more stable valuation metric. The market's focus on P/E could lead to mispricing if the tax benefit reverses.