Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -19.7x · EV/EBITDA 20.0x · ROE -5.1%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13.4B | $16.6B | $10.1B | $17.0B | $25.5B | $27.2B | $15.8B | $7.8B | $8.4B | $14.4B | $9.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $15.1B | $18.3B | $12.5B | $20.4B | $27.4B | $29.3B | $18.7B | $10.3B | $9.6B | $15.1B | $9.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | -19.73 | — | — | 10.81 | 9.49 | 220.54 | 41.91 | 14.55 | 12.16 | 261.00 | 15.15 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.60 | 3.24 | 1.88 | 1.77 | 3.49 | 8.19 | 5.04 | 2.16 | 2.50 | 4.68 | 3.64 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.37 | 1.70 | 0.99 | 1.76 | 3.12 | 4.69 | 3.53 | 1.90 | 2.24 | 3.76 | 2.47 |
| P/FCF | 19.33 | 24.04 | — | — | 39.53 | — | — | — | — | — | 18.16 |
| P/OCF | 10.44 | 12.98 | 14.71 | 12.83 | 13.39 | 79.13 | 19.72 | 10.80 | 15.45 | 47.28 | 13.29 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.56 | 2.33 | 2.12 | 3.74 | 8.81 | 5.98 | 2.88 | 2.84 | 4.91 | 3.68 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.96 | 24.29 | — | 30.41 | 9.76 | 37.28 | 24.68 | 11.50 | 10.36 | 18.39 | 13.38 |
| EV / EBIT | 160.58 | — | — | 9.20 | 8.22 | 100.82 | 35.57 | 15.09 | 13.23 | 24.21 | 19.32 |
| EV / FCF | — | 26.47 | — | — | 42.34 | — | — | — | — | — | 18.35 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 13.1% | 13.1% | 1.1% | 12.5% | 42.2% | 30.3% | 31.8% | 35.1% | 36.2% | 36.6% | 36.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.8% | 1.8% | -11.8% | 2.5% | 34.2% | 16.0% | 16.8% | 19.1% | 21.5% | 20.3% | 19.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -9.9% | -9.9% | -21.9% | 16.4% | 36.7% | 3.7% | 12.0% | 14.9% | 20.6% | 1.8% | 24.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -5.1% | -5.1% | -11.9% | 17.6% | 38.4% | 2.4% | 8.8% | 13.6% | 18.3% | 1.4% | 17.5% |
| ROA | -3.1% | -3.1% | -6.8% | 9.3% | 20.4% | 1.2% | 3.7% | 6.1% | 9.0% | 0.7% | 7.2% |
| ROIC | 0.6% | 0.6% | -3.7% | 1.6% | 21.0% | 5.2% | 5.6% | 8.9% | 11.5% | 10.9% | 6.9% |
| ROCE | 0.6% | 0.6% | -4.3% | 1.8% | 22.9% | 6.0% | 6.1% | 9.2% | 11.2% | 9.2% | 6.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.60 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.37 | 4.37 | — | 6.38 | 1.18 | 3.20 | 4.87 | 3.55 | 1.84 | 2.24 | 3.22 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 0.22 | 0.36 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.31 | 0.18 | 0.03 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.23 | 2.23 | — | 5.05 | 0.65 | 2.65 | 3.88 | 2.86 | 1.24 | 0.85 | 0.14 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.42 | — | — | 2.81 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.19 |
| Interest Coverage | -0.48 | -0.48 | -5.33 | 19.10 | 27.07 | 4.73 | 7.19 | 11.88 | 13.82 | 5.40 | 7.82 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.23 | 2.23 | 1.95 | 1.47 | 1.89 | 1.06 | 1.22 | 1.58 | 1.69 | 2.06 | 2.90 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.57 | 1.57 | 1.19 | 0.86 | 1.13 | 0.64 | 0.81 | 1.03 | 1.10 | 1.57 | 2.51 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.61 | 0.25 | 0.55 | 0.23 | 0.41 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.95 | 1.99 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.33 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.79 | 3.79 | 3.54 | 3.89 | 2.04 | 2.90 | 2.84 | 3.03 | 3.07 | 3.29 | 3.79 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 54.28 | 72.33 | 69.65 | 72.23 | 76.78 | 61.92 | 76.51 | 75.48 | 73.59 | 74.04 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.4% | 1.1% | 1.9% | 1.1% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 1.0% | 2.0% | 1.7% | 1.0% | 1.4% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | 11.9% | 6.9% | 143.8% | 43.1% | 28.5% | 20.8% | 256.3% | 21.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 9.2% | 10.5% | 0.5% | 2.4% | 6.9% | 8.2% | 0.4% | 6.6% |
| FCF Yield | 5.2% | 4.2% | — | — | 2.5% | — | — | — | — | — | 5.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 5.9% | 1.7% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.4% | 1.1% | 1.9% | 1.1% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 1.0% | 2.0% | 7.6% | 2.7% | 1.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $118M | $118M | $118M | $118M | $117M | $107M | $106M | $109M | $112M | $113M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ALB stock.
Albemarle Corporation's current P/E ratio is -19.7x. The historical average is 17.0x.
Albemarle Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 20.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.3x.
Albemarle Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -5.1%. The historical average is 14.5%.
Based on historical data, Albemarle Corporation is trading at a P/E of -19.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Albemarle Corporation's current dividend yield is 1.43%.
Albemarle Corporation has 13.1% gross margin and 1.8% operating margin.
Albemarle Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Lithium price volatility and margin recovery sustainability
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Masks TTM Losses
Q2 2026 gross margin rebounded to 33.9% from 14.8% a year earlier, per reported figures, yet TTM net margin remains deeply negative at -9.9%, indicating the recovery is recent and not yet broad-based.
The sharp sequential improvement in gross margin from 14.2% in Q4 2025 to 33.9% in Q2 2026 suggests that lower-cost inventory and price resets are flowing through, but the trailing twelve-month net margin of -9.9% reflects the lingering impact of prior-period losses and inventory write-downs. Operating margin of 26.0% in Q2 2026 versus -20.7% in Q4 2024 highlights the extreme operating leverage in this business, yet the sustainability of these margins depends on lithium prices holding above cash costs. Investors should monitor whether the Q2 2026 margin expansion is durable or a one-time repricing benefit, especially given that revenue growth remains negative at -4.4% year-over-year.
ROIC Inflects from Negative to Positive
ROIC turned positive at 3.1% in Q2 2026 after four consecutive quarters of negative returns, according to the data, suggesting the trough in capital efficiency may be behind, though returns remain well below cost of capital.
The transition from a ROIC of -1.6% in Q4 2024 to +3.1% in Q2 2026 is driven primarily by margin recovery rather than asset efficiency, as asset turnover remains low at 0.11x. The company's heavy fixed-asset base, with PP&E at 53% of total assets, means that returns on capital are highly sensitive to cyclical pricing; the current ROIC of 3.1% is still far below the levels seen in prior lithium upcycles. This suggests that while the worst may be over, the company is not yet generating returns that justify its capital intensity, and investors should watch whether ROIC can sustain above 5% as the cycle matures.
Working Capital Cycle Compresses Sharply
Cash conversion cycle improved to 81 days in Q2 2026 from 129 days a year earlier, per the data, driven by faster receivables collection and lower inventory days, signaling better working capital discipline.
DSO fell from 78 days in Q1 2025 to 36 days in Q2 2026, while DIO dropped from 154 to 108 days, indicating that the company is managing inventory levels more tightly in response to the price downturn. DPO also declined from 91 to 63 days, which may reflect reduced purchasing activity or improved payment terms, but the net effect is a significant release of cash from working capital. This efficiency gain is a positive sign, but it may be partly a function of lower sales volumes rather than structural improvement; if volumes recover, the cycle could lengthen again.
Deleveraging Improves Coverage Ratios
Debt-to-equity fell to 0.19 in Q2 2026 from 0.35 a year earlier, while interest coverage jumped to 15.0x from 2.4x, per reported figures, indicating a much more comfortable debt service position.
The reduction in total debt to $2.0 billion, combined with a rebound in operating income, has transformed interest coverage from negative in late 2025 to a robust 15.0x in Q2 2026. This deleveraging appears deliberate, as the company has cut capex dramatically and generated strong free cash flow, but the low D/E of 0.19 may also reflect a recent equity raise or asset sales that warrant verification. The improved coverage provides a cushion against further lithium price weakness, but investors should note that D/EBITDA of 2.61x is still elevated relative to the cyclical trough, and any sustained margin compression could quickly erode this progress.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens Amid Cyclicality
Current ratio improved to 2.09 in Q2 2026 from 1.95 in Q4 2024, with cash at $1.6 billion, per the balance sheet, providing a solid cushion against near-term volatility.
The quick ratio of 1.35 indicates that even excluding inventory, the company can cover its current liabilities, which is reassuring given the inventory write-down risk in a falling price environment. The build-up in cash and the reduction in debt suggest that management is prioritizing balance sheet strength over growth, which is prudent given the cyclicality of lithium. However, the current ratio has declined from a peak of 2.84 in Q1 2024, and the reliance on inventory (DIO of 108 days) means that a further price drop could impair liquidity through additional write-downs.
P/E Misleads in Cyclical Downturn
The trailing P/E of -22.7 is meaningless given negative TTM earnings, while the forward P/E of 10.4 may overstate value if the Q2 2026 earnings beat proves non-recurring, per the data.
For a commodity-linked business like Albemarle, P/E ratios are notoriously unreliable at cycle extremes; the negative TTM P/E reflects past losses, while the forward P/E assumes the Q2 2026 annualized earnings are sustainable, which is far from certain given negative revenue growth. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 22.6x trailing and 13.5x forward, still appears rich relative to the company's historical average and peers like SQM at 15.2x. Investors should instead focus on cash flow-based metrics, such as P/FCF of 22.2x, which better captures the company's ability to generate cash through the cycle, but even that may be distorted by working capital swings.