Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -436.1x · EV/EBITDA 60.4x · ROE -1.6%. (2019–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.5B | $5.6B | $4.7B | $5.2B | $9.3B | $5.6B | $4.8B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $6.7B | $5.7B | $4.9B | $5.3B | $9.0B | $5.4B | $4.6B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -436.15 | — | — | 34.56 | 49.47 | 47.06 | 266.84 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 7.35 | 6.27 | 6.44 | 5.00 | 9.55 | 7.28 | 8.10 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 6.79 | 5.83 | 5.01 | 4.64 | 9.61 | 7.61 | 8.16 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 52.38 | 44.69 | 212.51 | 92.17 | 81.94 | 64.94 | 59.96 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 40.11 | 34.23 | 75.37 | 28.88 | 48.11 | 35.85 | 39.74 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.40 | 6.78 | 5.06 | 9.23 | 6.97 | 7.81 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 60.39 | 51.69 | 109.92 | 19.85 | 35.36 | 28.92 | 76.39 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 156.01 | 308.33 | — | 25.84 | 42.05 | 37.39 | 1943.07 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 45.64 | 223.77 | 93.28 | 79.22 | 62.14 | 57.81 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 46.4% | 46.4% | 44.3% | 54.8% | 56.1% | 53.0% | 47.2% | 40.2% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 4.8% | -2.7% | 18.7% | 20.9% | 17.8% | 2.1% | 8.1% | 13.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -1.7% | -1.7% | -10.1% | 14.6% | 19.2% | 15.5% | 3.0% | 5.7% | 11.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -1.6% | -1.6% | -7.1% | 14.6% | 22.0% | 18.1% | 2.9% | 6.0% | 14.4% |
| ROA | -1.1% | -1.1% | -4.9% | 11.3% | 18.1% | 14.6% | 2.3% | 4.7% | 11.3% |
| ROIC | 2.8% | 2.8% | -1.3% | 15.9% | 26.5% | 22.5% | 2.0% | 7.6% | 14.1% |
| ROCE | 3.3% | 3.3% | -1.5% | 16.2% | 22.5% | 19.3% | 1.9% | 8.0% | 15.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.40 | 0.24 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.07 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.60 | 2.60 | 8.24 | 1.03 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.41 | 0.73 | 0.27 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.12 | 0.27 | 0.06 | -0.32 | -0.33 | -0.29 | -0.20 | -0.10 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.07 | 1.07 | 5.53 | 0.24 | -1.22 | -1.30 | -2.85 | -1.10 | -0.36 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.95 | 11.26 | 1.11 | -2.72 | -2.80 | -2.16 | -3.60 | -2.50 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.55 | 0.55 | -1.82 | 19.10 | 91.47 | 57.32 | 0.62 | 485.35 | 83.12 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.45 | 3.45 | 4.30 | 4.85 | 4.03 | 4.91 | 3.69 | 2.99 | 3.53 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.66 | 3.48 | 3.11 | 4.08 | 2.94 | 2.14 | 2.27 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.08 | 1.80 | 2.13 | 2.71 | 1.69 | 1.43 | 0.96 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.63 | 0.51 | 0.69 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.96 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.63 | 2.63 | 2.19 | 2.93 | 2.83 | 4.19 | 3.57 | 3.06 | 3.09 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 47.15 | 43.88 | 43.54 | 48.91 | 57.33 | 58.56 | 51.71 | 58.42 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8.3% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2228.0% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 2.9% | 2.0% | 2.1% | 0.4% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.9% | 2.2% | 0.5% | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.5% | 1.7% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 18.3% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 18.3% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 8.3% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $185M | $188M | $195M | $194M | $192M | $190M | $189M | $188M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ALGM stock.
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -436.1x. The historical average is 43.7x.
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 60.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 42.4x.
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -1.6%. The historical average is 8.7%.
Based on historical data, Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -436.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. has 46.4% gross margin and 4.8% operating margin.
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.6x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Operating margin compression persists
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Still Incomplete
Gross margin improved to 48.5% in 2027Q1 from 41.4% in 2025Q4, yet operating margin at 9.8% remains far below the 51.2% gross peak, indicating structural cost pressures, per recent filings.
The gap between gross and operating margins—roughly 38.7 percentage points—reflects heavy R&D and SG&A spending, which consumed over 21% of revenue in R&D alone. While operating leverage is emerging as revenue scales, the net margin of 6.1% in 2027Q1 is still thin, and prior quarters showed net losses, suggesting that profitability is not yet stable. Investors should monitor whether the gross margin recovery can be sustained as mix shifts toward data center products, which may carry different cost structures.
Returns on Capital Remain Subdued
ROIC improved to 1.8% in 2027Q1 from negative levels in 2025, but remains well below the cost of capital, indicating that the company is not yet generating economic returns, based on reported figures.
Despite revenue growth of 27.5% YoY, ROIC has only recently turned positive, and the 10-quarter trend shows it oscillating near zero. The low asset turnover of 0.18x, combined with thin margins, suggests that the capital base is not being deployed efficiently yet. The improvement from -0.8% in 2025Q4 to 1.8% in 2027Q1 is encouraging, but it is still far from the double-digit returns typical of high-quality semiconductor franchises, implying that the market's premium valuation is based on future potential rather than current returns.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens
Cash conversion cycle extended to 133 days in 2027Q1 from 144 days a year earlier, driven by high inventory days of 126, indicating that working capital efficiency remains a drag, as per quarterly data.
Inventory days have remained elevated, hovering around 126-152 days over the past year, which is high for a fab-lite model and suggests either deliberate stockpiling for growth or slower inventory turns. DSO has improved to 42 days from 52 days in 2025Q1, but the overall CCC is still long, tying up cash. The improvement in DPO to 35 days is modest, and the company's ability to manage inventory will be critical as automotive demand fluctuates, given the bullwhip effect risk in the supply chain.
Leverage Eases but Coverage Remains Thin
Debt-to-EBITDA improved to 6.78x in 2027Q1 from 135x in 2025Q4, yet interest coverage of 4.97x is still modest, indicating that debt service is manageable but not yet comfortable, based on reported figures.
Total debt has been reduced to $287.2M, and the D/E ratio has fallen to 0.30, reflecting a deliberate deleveraging. However, the absolute level of debt relative to EBITDA is still high, and the interest coverage ratio, while improved, is only around 5x, which leaves little room for a downturn. The improvement from negative coverage in 2025 is positive, but investors should monitor whether EBITDA growth can outpace any future debt issuance or refinancing needs.
Liquidity Buffer Remains Solid
Current ratio stands at 3.70 with quick ratio at 2.33, providing a strong cushion against short-term shocks, though inventory dependence is notable, as reported in the latest quarterly balance sheet.
The current ratio has remained above 3.0 for the past ten quarters, indicating a robust liquidity position. Cash of $162.0M and a quick ratio of 2.33 suggest that even if inventory becomes difficult to liquidate, the company can cover its short-term obligations. However, the high inventory days (126) imply that a portion of current assets is tied up in slow-moving stock, which could become a drag if demand softens. Overall, the liquidity position appears adequate to weather a cyclical downturn.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA Multiple
The EV/EBITDA multiple of 63.85x is misleading for ALGM because EBITDA is depressed by heavy R&D and acquisition-related charges, obscuring the company's cash generation potential, as per financial disclosures.
Analysts often use EV/EBITDA to value semiconductor companies, but for ALGM, this metric is distorted by the fact that EBITDA is currently low relative to revenue, due to high operating expenses and non-cash charges. A more appropriate metric might be EV/Sales or EV/forward EBITDA, which better capture the growth trajectory. The forward EV/EBITDA of 44.62x still implies a premium, but it is more reflective of expected earnings recovery. Investors should focus on the company's ability to convert its 48.5% gross margin into operating profit as revenue scales, rather than relying on trailing EBITDA multiples that are artificially depressed.