Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 38.5x · EV/EBITDA 24.8x · ROE 14.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $56.5B | $47.5B | $41.9B | $38.2B | $32.4B | $34.2B | $28.0B | $22.9B | $15.8B | $16.8B | $11.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $58.4B | $49.4B | $43.8B | $41.1B | $34.6B | $36.6B | $29.2B | $25.3B | $18.0B | $18.3B | $13.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 38.51 | 32.08 | 30.40 | 29.08 | 27.89 | 34.60 | 32.08 | 26.60 | 20.27 | 24.65 | 22.19 |
| P/S Ratio | 7.63 | 6.42 | 6.03 | 5.79 | 5.26 | 6.17 | 6.16 | 4.44 | 3.25 | 3.91 | 2.96 |
| P/B Ratio | 5.36 | 4.47 | 4.33 | 4.37 | 4.33 | 4.98 | 4.70 | 4.47 | 3.71 | 4.17 | 3.49 |
| P/FCF | 33.79 | 28.41 | 24.59 | 23.87 | 32.02 | 32.61 | 23.17 | 22.61 | 18.68 | 22.16 | 16.38 |
| P/OCF | 31.35 | 26.35 | 22.88 | 22.00 | 28.15 | 29.50 | 21.82 | 20.53 | 17.02 | 20.16 | 15.01 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.67 | 6.31 | 6.24 | 5.62 | 6.60 | 6.43 | 4.90 | 3.72 | 4.26 | 3.38 |
| EV / EBITDA | 24.75 | 20.93 | 20.25 | 20.12 | 18.99 | 22.87 | 22.76 | 17.92 | 14.14 | 16.87 | 13.38 |
| EV / EBIT | 30.16 | 26.26 | 24.68 | 24.37 | 22.86 | 28.08 | 24.99 | 21.84 | 16.85 | 20.49 | 16.49 |
| EV / FCF | — | 29.53 | 25.74 | 25.73 | 34.21 | 34.87 | 24.20 | 25.00 | 21.38 | 24.18 | 18.72 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 36.4% | 36.4% | 35.7% | 36.1% | 34.9% | 34.5% | 34.0% | 34.7% | 34.2% | 33.5% | 32.7% |
| Operating Margin | 26.2% | 26.2% | 25.6% | 25.9% | 24.4% | 23.6% | 22.6% | 22.8% | 22.2% | 21.0% | 20.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 20.0% | 20.0% | 19.8% | 19.9% | 18.9% | 17.8% | 19.2% | 16.7% | 16.1% | 15.8% | 13.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.6% | 14.6% | 15.0% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 15.4% | 15.8% | 18.4% | 18.8% | 18.7% | 15.7% |
| ROA | 9.6% | 9.6% | 9.3% | 9.6% | 9.5% | 8.9% | 8.6% | 9.3% | 9.5% | 9.1% | 7.4% |
| ROIC | 12.0% | 12.0% | 11.5% | 12.0% | 11.9% | 11.9% | 10.5% | 12.6% | 13.4% | 13.0% | 12.2% |
| ROCE | 15.0% | 15.0% | 14.4% | 14.8% | 14.2% | 13.3% | 11.6% | 14.9% | 15.3% | 14.1% | 13.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.39 | 0.34 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.72 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.07 | 1.65 | 1.41 | 1.70 | 1.92 | 1.99 | 2.06 | 2.00 | 2.41 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.34 | 0.30 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 0.47 | 0.54 | 0.38 | 0.50 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.90 | 1.45 | 1.22 | 1.48 | 0.97 | 1.71 | 1.79 | 1.41 | 1.67 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.13 | 1.15 | 1.85 | 2.19 | 2.26 | 1.03 | 2.39 | 2.70 | 2.02 | 2.34 |
| Interest Coverage | 23.13 | 23.13 | 15.71 | 20.64 | 18.17 | 16.22 | 13.58 | 13.09 | 13.02 | 9.13 | 8.35 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 | 1.24 | 0.98 | 1.62 | 1.36 | 2.34 | 1.42 | 1.46 | 1.70 | 2.09 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.59 | 0.95 | 0.87 | 1.82 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 1.22 | 1.55 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 1.13 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.57 | 0.78 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.54 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.26 | 4.26 | 4.37 | 3.72 | 3.84 | 4.72 | 5.36 | 5.40 | 5.10 | 5.29 | 5.25 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 55.20 | 49.89 | 56.04 | 54.56 | 54.57 | 48.03 | 52.70 | 55.20 | 56.72 | 56.30 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 19.3% | 19.3% | 18.8% | 17.5% | 17.4% | 18.6% | 18.9% | 14.8% | 16.6% | 12.1% | 16.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | 3.4% | 3.6% | 2.9% | 3.1% | 3.8% | 4.9% | 4.1% | 4.5% |
| FCF Yield | 3.0% | 3.5% | 4.1% | 4.2% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 4.3% | 4.4% | 5.4% | 4.5% | 6.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.8% | 0.9% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 2.3% | 0.0% | 3.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.3% | 1.5% | 1.1% | 0.6% | 1.7% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 3.2% | 0.5% | 3.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $231M | $232M | $232M | $232M | $233M | $231M | $229M | $233M | $232M | $234M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AME stock.
AMETEK, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 38.5x. The historical average is 21.7x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
AMETEK, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 24.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.4x.
AMETEK, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 14.6%. The historical average is 20.6%.
Based on historical data, AMETEK, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 38.5x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
AMETEK, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.50% with a payout ratio of 19.3%.
AMETEK, Inc. has 36.4% gross margin and 26.2% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
AMETEK, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.0x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
M&A integration and cyclicality
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Reflects Niche Pricing Power
Gross margin improved to 36.0% in 2026Q2 from 34.1% in 2024Q1, as reported in financial statements, indicating sustained pricing power and favorable mix within AMETEK's niche businesses.
The 190 basis point gross margin expansion since 2024Q1 suggests that AMETEK's niche-dominance strategy is translating into durable pricing power, likely due to the low cost-to-value ratio of its components. Operating margin has remained stable around 26%, with net margin hovering near 20%, which is well above the industrial average and indicates effective cost control. The consistency of these margins across quarters, despite revenue fluctuations, points to a structural profitability advantage rather than a cyclical peak.
ROIC Stable but Understated by Acquisition Intangibles
ROIC has held steady at approximately 3.0% over the past ten quarters, as per quarterly data, but this understates economic returns given the heavy goodwill and intangibles from acquisitions.
The reported ROIC of around 3% appears low for a company with AMETEK's margins, but this is largely because the denominator includes $7.4 billion of goodwill and intangibles, which represent acquisition premiums rather than productive capital. Adjusting for these intangibles would likely reveal a much higher return on tangible capital, consistent with the company's asset-light model. The stability of ROIC over time suggests that management is consistently deploying capital at similar rates of return, though investors should monitor whether larger acquisitions dilute this metric.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves with Lower CCC
Cash conversion cycle improved to 89 days in 2026Q2 from 101 days in 2024Q1, as reported in financial statements, reflecting better inventory management and faster collections.
The reduction in CCC is driven by a decline in days inventory outstanding from 90 to 81 days, while DSO has remained stable around 52 days. This suggests that AMETEK is managing its inventory more efficiently, possibly due to better demand forecasting or improved supply chain practices. The stable DPO around 43 days indicates that the company is not stretching supplier payments, which is consistent with its strong supplier relationships. Overall, the efficiency gains are modest but positive, contributing to the robust free cash flow margin of 22.1%.
Fortress Balance Sheet Provides M&A Firepower
Debt-to-equity fell to 0.21 in 2026Q2 from 0.35 in 2024Q1, with interest coverage at 17.4x, as per quarterly data, indicating exceptional financial flexibility.
The declining leverage and high interest coverage suggest that AMETEK has significant capacity to take on debt for future acquisitions without straining its balance sheet. The D/EBITDA ratio of 3.64x is conservative for an industrial company, and the low debt load means that refinancing risk is minimal. This fortress-like balance sheet supports the company's M&A-driven growth model, but investors should watch for potential large-scale deployment that could increase leverage and alter the risk profile.
Liquidity Adequate but Quick Ratio Raises Caution
Current ratio improved to 1.21 in 2026Q2, but quick ratio of 0.76, as reported in financial statements, suggests reliance on inventory to meet short-term obligations.
The current ratio of 1.21 is adequate, but the quick ratio of 0.76 indicates that a significant portion of current assets is tied up in inventory. This is typical for a manufacturer, but it means that in a severe demand shock, AMETEK might face liquidity pressure if inventory cannot be converted to cash quickly. However, the company's strong cash flow generation and low debt mitigate this risk, as it can rely on operating cash flows to cover short-term needs.
Premium Valuation Justified by Superior Margins
AMETEK trades at 40x P/E and 25.7x EV/EBITDA, as per current multiples, a premium to peers like Roper and Fortive, reflecting its higher net margin of 20%.
Compared to peers, AMETEK's valuation is at the higher end, with a P/E of 40x versus Roper's 28x and Fortive's 35.5x. This premium appears justified by its superior net margin of 20%, which is among the highest in the group, and its consistent ROE of around 3.7% (though this is understated due to intangibles). The market is likely pricing AMETEK as a high-quality compounder with durable competitive advantages, rather than a cyclical industrial. However, the elevated valuation leaves little room for error, and any miss in growth expectations could lead to multiple compression.
P/E Misleads Due to Acquisition Amortization
The P/E ratio of 40x is inflated by acquisition-related amortization, as per financial statements, obscuring the company's true cash earnings power.
AMETEK's GAAP earnings are significantly reduced by amortization of intangibles from its many acquisitions, making the P/E appear higher than the economic reality. Investors should instead focus on EV/EBITDA or P/FCF, which adjust for these non-cash charges. The P/FCF of 35x is still rich, but it better reflects the company's cash generation. Additionally, the PEG ratio of 3.59 suggests that the market is pricing in high growth, but this may be overly optimistic given the cyclicality of some end markets. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBIT or a cash-flow-based multiple that excludes amortization.