Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -17.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -20.8%. (2002–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $641M | $477M | $418M | $254M | $373M | $766M | $886M | $388M | $704M | $789M | $557M |
| Enterprise Value | $587M | $423M | $372M | $182M | $393M | $771M | $858M | $374M | $613M | $809M | $616M |
| P/E Ratio → | -17.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11.46 | 47.80 | 79.37 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.00 | 1.49 | 1.43 | 0.83 | 1.10 | 2.42 | 3.05 | 1.47 | 1.96 | 2.29 | 1.59 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.77 | 2.79 | 2.28 | 1.23 | 0.99 | 1.80 | 2.02 | 0.85 | 1.15 | 1.45 | 1.08 |
| P/FCF | 1261.94 | 938.42 | — | — | — | — | 46.89 | — | 20.52 | 20.98 | 10.57 |
| P/OCF | 207.53 | 154.33 | — | — | 4788.26 | — | 36.79 | — | 18.81 | 19.12 | 10.00 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.32 | 1.27 | 0.60 | 1.16 | 2.44 | 2.95 | 1.42 | 1.71 | 2.35 | 1.76 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 877.81 | — | — | 37.20 | 89.97 | 45.16 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 832.39 | — | — | — | — | 45.40 | — | 17.87 | 21.50 | 11.67 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 54.6% | 54.6% | 53.9% | 50.9% | 51.4% | 52.4% | 53.9% | 56.9% | 43.4% | 41.8% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | -12.5% | -12.5% | -13.7% | -63.3% | -15.1% | -9.0% | -12.1% | -63.3% | -2.6% | -4.1% | -3.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | -11.5% | -11.5% | -11.6% | -60.7% | -15.5% | -8.4% | -10.8% | -63.1% | 17.1% | 4.7% | -2.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -20.8% | -20.8% | -17.5% | -63.1% | -13.1% | -6.1% | -7.0% | -31.2% | 10.6% | 3.1% | -1.4% |
| ROA | -13.4% | -13.4% | -11.4% | -43.4% | -9.7% | -4.8% | -5.5% | -23.3% | 8.0% | 2.3% | -1.0% |
| ROIC | -23.6% | -23.6% | -22.1% | -54.2% | -9.3% | -5.1% | -6.2% | -25.9% | -1.3% | -1.9% | -1.4% |
| ROCE | -20.1% | -20.1% | -18.6% | -57.0% | -11.0% | -5.8% | -6.7% | -25.6% | -1.3% | -2.2% | -1.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.20 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 38.48 | — | — | 8.28 | 10.42 | 7.77 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.32 | -0.25 | -0.35 | 0.05 | 0.01 | -0.06 | -0.03 | -0.15 | 0.04 | 0.11 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 5.65 | — | — | -5.53 | 2.18 | 4.28 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -106.03 | — | — | — | — | -1.49 | — | -2.65 | 0.52 | 1.11 |
| Interest Coverage | -120.40 | -120.40 | — | — | -6.91 | -26.48 | -40.87 | -184.37 | -1.88 | -4.64 | -4.04 |
Net cash position: cash ($54M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.19 | 2.19 | 2.21 | 2.12 | 1.95 | 1.93 | 2.45 | 2.97 | 4.30 | 2.93 | 2.21 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.49 | 1.49 | 1.40 | 1.46 | 1.29 | 1.24 | 1.60 | 1.80 | 3.75 | 2.25 | 1.43 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 0.53 | 0.39 | 0.84 | 1.06 | 3.11 | 1.32 | 0.70 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.20 | 1.04 | 0.96 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.49 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.77 | 2.77 | 2.17 | 2.46 | 2.97 | 2.93 | 2.76 | 1.90 | 2.86 | 3.00 | 2.31 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 55.09 | 53.83 | 60.06 | 56.92 | 65.21 | 46.80 | 47.22 | 44.25 | 41.77 | 48.40 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8.7% | 2.1% | 1.3% |
| FCF Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | — | — | — | — | 2.1% | — | 4.9% | 4.8% | 9.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $42M | $41M | $40M | $39M | $39M | $38M | $38M | $37M | $38M | $37M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 25 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ANGO stock.
AngioDynamics, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -17.6x. The historical average is 53.6x.
AngioDynamics, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -20.8%. The historical average is 3.5%.
Based on historical data, AngioDynamics, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -17.6x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
AngioDynamics, Inc. has 54.6% gross margin and -12.5% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent operating losses and cash burn
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Gross Margin Expansion Fails to Offset SG&A Burden
AngioDynamics' gross margin expanded to 57.1% in 2026Q4, the highest in the observed period, yet operating losses widened to -23.5% of revenue, indicating that SG&A and R&D expenses are scaling faster than gross profit and preventing the company from achieving operating leverage.
The improvement in gross margin from 47.7% in 2024Q3 to 57.1% in 2026Q4 suggests better product mix or cost control at the manufacturing level. However, this progress is entirely consumed by an SG&A burden that has risen to 47.8% of revenue, as reported in recent financial statements, leaving no room for operating profit. The persistent negative net margin, which stood at -13.2% in 2026Q4, underscores that the company's core earning power remains deeply impaired despite top-line growth.
Negative Returns Signal Capital Destruction
AngioDynamics' ROIC has been consistently negative, reaching -11.6% in 2026Q4, indicating that the company is destroying value on the capital invested in its operations and is far from achieving a sustainable return profile.
The negative ROIC trend, which has persisted for all ten quarters, is a direct consequence of the company's inability to generate positive operating income. This suggests that the current asset base, which includes goodwill of $67.2M, is not being deployed effectively to generate returns. The deepening equity deficit of -$465.9M, as noted in prior balance sheet analysis, is a cumulative reflection of this long-term capital destruction.
Working Capital Volatility Masks Underlying Inefficiency
AngioDynamics' cash conversion cycle has been volatile, ranging from 112 to 145 days over the past ten quarters, with a 2026Q4 cycle of 112 days driven by a reduction in days inventory outstanding to 137 days from a peak of 187.
The improvement in the cash conversion cycle appears driven by inventory reduction rather than a structural improvement in operational efficiency. Days sales outstanding have remained relatively stable around 50-64 days, suggesting no significant change in customer payment terms or collection efficiency. The volatility in the cycle, as highlighted in prior cash flow analysis, indicates that working capital swings are a major driver of cash flow, not consistent operational performance.
Low Leverage Masks Underlying Asset Quality Concerns
AngioDynamics' debt-to-equity ratio increased from 0.02 in 2024Q3 to 0.07 in 2026Q3, a relative tripling that occurred alongside a significant reduction in total assets, suggesting the balance sheet is becoming more leveraged on a shrinking base.
While the absolute leverage remains low compared to peers like Merit Medical (D/E 0.57) and Integer Holdings (D/E 0.80), the trend is concerning. The increase in leverage has occurred as the company's equity base has eroded due to accumulated losses, not as a result of strategic debt financing for growth. The negative interest coverage ratio of -104.10 in 2026Q4, as reported in the ratio data, confirms that operating losses are insufficient to cover interest expenses, a situation that would become problematic if the company needed to access debt markets.
P/E Ratio Misleads on a Loss-Making Business
The P/E ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric to AngioDynamics, as the negative TTM P/E of -18.01 is meaningless for a company with persistent operating losses and provides no insight into valuation or future earnings potential.
For a company like AngioDynamics, which is not generating positive earnings, the P/E ratio is an irrelevant and misleading metric. Investors should instead focus on the EV/Sales multiple of 2.05, which provides a more meaningful comparison to peers like Merit Medical (EV/Sales ~4.5x) and CONMED (EV/Sales ~2.5x). The forward EV/EBITDA of 37.04, while also elevated, at least incorporates an expectation of future profitability, but its reliability is questionable given the company's history of missing profitability targets.