Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.8x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -35.4%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.2B | $2.2B | $4.3B | $4.4B | $5.3B | $5.4B | $4.3B | $4.9B | $5.4B | $4.1B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $4.5B | $3.6B | $5.5B | $5.5B | $6.1B | $7.3B | $5.9B | $6.3B | $7.6B | $6.3B | $5.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.76 | — | 25.73 | 24.68 | 5.79 | 24.35 | — | 9.60 | 47.11 | 4061.49 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.73 | 1.21 | 2.06 | 2.01 | 2.22 | 2.58 | 2.15 | 2.26 | 2.07 | 1.76 | 1.19 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.67 | 1.16 | 1.52 | 1.42 | 1.65 | 1.98 | 1.42 | 1.36 | 1.58 | 1.19 | 1.13 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 15.87 | 60.42 | — | 11.95 | 61.80 | 55.79 | 38.34 | 24.42 | 8.02 |
| P/OCF | 33.62 | 23.45 | 10.58 | 18.15 | — | 9.71 | 21.31 | 20.14 | 18.07 | 10.59 | 5.29 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.95 | 2.61 | 2.49 | 2.53 | 3.47 | 2.91 | 2.93 | 2.94 | 2.73 | 1.68 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 22.24 | 13.14 | 10.55 | 16.81 | — | 17.33 | 20.06 | 17.97 | 19.93 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 190.22 | 25.48 | 22.59 | 35.93 | — | 59.90 | 59.86 | 41.77 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 20.13 | 74.68 | — | 16.11 | 83.73 | 72.29 | 54.30 | 38.00 | 11.32 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 30.1% | 29.2% | 30.5% | 34.7% | 31.7% | 29.7% | 30.3% | 33.3% | 31.6% | 29.4% |
| Operating Margin | -42.5% | -42.5% | -1.2% | 7.9% | 13.9% | 9.1% | -22.9% | 4.0% | 3.9% | 2.1% | -1.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -46.3% | -46.3% | 8.0% | 8.1% | 38.8% | 10.4% | -25.2% | 23.5% | 4.4% | 0.0% | -1.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -35.4% | -35.4% | 5.7% | 5.6% | 31.0% | 7.6% | -15.4% | 14.5% | 3.3% | 0.0% | -0.9% |
| ROA | -16.5% | -16.5% | 2.9% | 2.9% | 14.5% | 3.3% | -7.2% | 6.5% | 1.4% | 0.0% | -0.3% |
| ROIC | -15.9% | -15.9% | -0.5% | 3.2% | 5.8% | 3.1% | -7.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | 0.7% | -0.7% |
| ROCE | -16.6% | -16.6% | -0.5% | 3.1% | 5.9% | 3.3% | -7.3% | 1.3% | 1.4% | 0.6% | -0.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.47 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.79 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 5.92 | 3.51 | 2.41 | 4.82 | — | 4.59 | 6.67 | 8.03 | 9.82 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.71 | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.23 | 0.69 | 0.51 | 0.40 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.47 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 4.71 | 2.51 | 1.28 | 4.34 | — | 3.95 | 5.90 | 6.42 | 5.82 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 4.26 | 14.26 | — | 4.16 | 21.93 | 16.49 | 15.96 | 13.57 | 3.31 |
| Interest Coverage | -11.84 | -11.84 | 0.55 | 3.75 | 4.06 | 2.79 | -5.37 | 0.92 | 1.09 | 0.67 | -0.68 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.85 | 2.85 | 2.44 | 3.30 | 3.20 | 1.84 | 1.90 | 1.89 | 1.59 | 1.97 | 2.33 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.33 | 1.93 | 2.06 | 1.33 | 1.28 | 1.10 | 0.98 | 1.31 | 1.90 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.91 | 1.17 | 0.22 | 0.56 | 0.31 | 0.27 | 0.58 | 0.82 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.27 | 0.30 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.24 | 2.24 | 2.74 | 2.43 | 2.48 | 3.05 | 2.80 | 2.51 | 2.60 | 2.49 | 3.96 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 48.43 | 41.98 | 56.31 | 61.37 | 63.80 | 78.94 | 81.73 | 96.01 | 96.74 | 61.42 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.4% | 3.4% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 1.9% | 2.7% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 46.2% | 42.7% | 7.6% | 31.8% | — | 12.7% | 52.6% | 7700.0% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 3.9% | 4.1% | 17.3% | 4.1% | — | 10.4% | 2.1% | 0.0% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 6.3% | 1.7% | — | 8.4% | 1.6% | 1.8% | 2.6% | 4.1% | 12.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.2% | 4.5% | 8.7% | 6.8% | 3.8% | 8.3% | 0.0% | 4.1% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 14.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.6% | 8.0% | 10.5% | 8.5% | 5.1% | 9.6% | 1.5% | 5.4% | 1.3% | 2.3% | 16.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $46M | $50M | $54M | $56M | $61M | $61M | $63M | $64M | $62M | $63M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ASH stock.
Ashland Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -3.8x. The historical average is 15.4x.
Ashland Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -35.4%. The historical average is 8.2%.
Based on historical data, Ashland Inc. is trading at a P/E of -3.8x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Ashland Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.39%.
Ashland Inc. has 30.1% gross margin and -42.5% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Impairment charges and demand volatility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Masks Underlying Distortions
Gross margin recovered to 31.2% in 2026Q3 from 15.1% a year earlier, but TTM operating margin remains deeply negative at -42.5%, per recent quarterly filings, reflecting impairment-driven distortions.
The sequential recovery in gross margin from 20.7% in 2026Q1 to 31.2% in 2026Q3 suggests a rebound in pricing or mix, yet the TTM operating margin of -42.5% is overwhelmed by non-cash charges, as evidenced by the 2025Q3 net margin of -160.3%. Investors should focus on adjusted operating margin, which appears to be in the high single digits based on 2026Q3's 8.2%, to gauge true earning power. The gap between reported and adjusted margins warrants close monitoring, as the sustainability of the recovery depends on whether the impairment charges are truly one-time.
Return on Capital Depressed by Impairments
ROIC improved to 1.0% in 2026Q3 from -0.3% in 2025Q3, but remains far below the cost of capital, per financial statements, as cumulative impairments have eroded the equity base.
The ten-quarter trend shows ROIC oscillating between -1.1% and 1.4%, with the 2025Q3 impairment quarter dragging the average down. The 2026Q3 ROIC of 1.0% is a recovery but still inadequate, suggesting that the company is not yet generating economic profits. The depressed equity base, down to $1.9B from $3.0B in 2024Q2, inflates ROE relative to what it would be on a normalized basis, but even so, ROE of 0.9% in 2026Q3 indicates minimal return for shareholders. The key driver is margin normalization; if adjusted operating margins sustain in the high single digits, ROIC could approach mid-single digits, but this remains contingent on the absence of further impairments.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens on Inventory
Cash conversion cycle extended to 128 days in 2026Q3 from 112 days in 2024Q2, driven by DIO rising to 133 days, per balance sheet data, indicating slower inventory turnover.
The CCC has trended upward over the past ten quarters, with DIO increasing from 123 days in 2024Q2 to 133 days in 2026Q3, while DSO and DPO have remained relatively stable. This suggests that inventory management has become less efficient, possibly due to deliberate stockpiling of raw materials or slower demand in certain segments. The company's ability to hold inventory is supported by a strong current ratio of 3.05, but the lengthening cycle ties up cash and may signal a need for working capital discipline. Investors should monitor whether DIO reverts to historical levels as demand normalizes.
Leverage Appears Manageable Despite Equity Erosion
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.79 in 2026Q3 from 0.49 in 2024Q2, but interest coverage improved to 5.54x, per recent filings, indicating debt service remains comfortable.
The increase in D/E is largely a function of equity compression from impairments, not a build-up of debt, as total debt has remained flat at $1.5B. Interest coverage of 5.54x in 2026Q3 is a recovery from the near-zero levels in 2026Q1, suggesting that operating earnings are sufficient to cover interest expenses. However, the D/EBITDA ratio of 16.58x is elevated, reflecting the depressed EBITDA due to impairments; on a normalized basis, this would be lower. The company's cash balance of $440M provides a buffer, but the high D/EBITDA warrants monitoring if impairments recur.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens with Cash Build
Current ratio improved to 3.05 in 2026Q3 from 2.68 a year earlier, with cash more than doubling to $440M, per balance sheet data, indicating a robust liquidity position.
The quick ratio of 1.89 in 2026Q3 is also strong, suggesting that even without selling inventory, the company can cover its short-term obligations. The cash build is likely a result of divestiture proceeds and strong free cash flow, which reached $102M in 2026Q3. This liquidity provides flexibility for M&A or debt reduction, but it also depresses returns on assets and equity. Under a severe stress scenario, the current ratio would likely remain above 2.0, given the defensive nature of the Life Sciences segment, but the high inventory levels could become a drag if demand falters.
Misapplied Metric: P/E on Distorted Earnings
The P/E ratio is misleading for Ashland due to impairment-driven losses; a trailing P/E of -3.96 and forward P/E of 20.50, per valuation data, obscures the underlying earnings power.
Given the massive non-cash charges in 2025Q3, the trailing P/E is meaningless, and even the forward P/E of 20.50 may be based on analyst estimates that exclude one-time items. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, but with a forward EV/EBITDA of 25.31, the stock appears richly valued relative to peers like RPM (16.96) and IFF (15.16). However, this multiple may be justified if the company achieves its targeted margin recovery and growth in Life Sciences. Investors should use EV/adjusted EBITDA or EV/EBIT to normalize for impairments and compare against specialty chemical peers.