Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 880.7x · EV/EBITDA 15.6x · ROE 0.2%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.5B | $3.1B | $2.2B | $4.3B | $4.4B | $5.3B | $5.4B | $4.3B | $4.9B | $5.4B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $4.5B | $4.1B | $3.6B | $5.5B | $5.5B | $6.1B | $7.3B | $5.9B | $6.3B | $7.6B | $6.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 880.69 | 780.69 | — | 25.73 | 24.68 | 5.79 | 24.35 | — | 9.60 | 47.11 | 4061.49 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.88 | 1.68 | 1.21 | 2.06 | 2.01 | 2.22 | 2.58 | 2.15 | 2.26 | 2.07 | 1.76 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.91 | 1.69 | 1.16 | 1.52 | 1.42 | 1.65 | 1.98 | 1.42 | 1.36 | 1.58 | 1.19 |
| P/FCF | 12.76 | 12.45 | — | 15.87 | 60.42 | — | 11.95 | 61.80 | 55.79 | 38.34 | 24.42 |
| P/OCF | 10.35 | 9.22 | 23.45 | 10.58 | 18.15 | — | 9.71 | 21.31 | 20.14 | 18.07 | 10.59 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.21 | 1.95 | 2.61 | 2.49 | 2.53 | 3.47 | 2.91 | 2.93 | 2.94 | 2.73 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.57 | 14.19 | — | 22.24 | 13.14 | 10.55 | 16.81 | — | 17.33 | 20.06 | 17.97 |
| EV / EBIT | 42.86 | 37.76 | — | 190.22 | 25.48 | 22.59 | 35.93 | — | 59.90 | 59.86 | 41.77 |
| EV / FCF | — | 16.40 | — | 20.13 | 74.68 | — | 16.11 | 83.73 | 72.29 | 54.30 | 38.00 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 32.3% | 32.3% | 30.1% | 29.2% | 30.5% | 34.7% | 31.7% | 29.7% | 30.3% | 33.3% | 31.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 5.6% | -42.5% | -1.2% | 7.9% | 13.9% | 9.1% | -22.9% | 4.0% | 3.9% | 2.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.2% | 0.2% | -46.3% | 8.0% | 8.1% | 38.8% | 10.4% | -25.2% | 23.5% | 4.4% | 0.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.2% | 0.2% | -35.4% | 5.7% | 5.6% | 31.0% | 7.6% | -15.4% | 14.5% | 3.3% | 0.0% |
| ROA | 0.1% | 0.1% | -16.5% | 2.9% | 2.9% | 14.5% | 3.3% | -7.2% | 6.5% | 1.4% | 0.0% |
| ROIC | 2.6% | 2.6% | -15.9% | -0.5% | 3.2% | 5.8% | 3.1% | -7.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | 0.7% |
| ROCE | 2.5% | 2.5% | -16.6% | -0.5% | 3.1% | 5.9% | 3.3% | -7.3% | 1.3% | 1.4% | 0.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.47 | 0.74 | 0.83 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.08 | 5.08 | — | 5.92 | 3.51 | 2.41 | 4.82 | — | 4.59 | 6.67 | 8.03 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.54 | 0.71 | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.23 | 0.69 | 0.51 | 0.40 | 0.66 | 0.66 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.42 | 3.42 | — | 4.71 | 2.51 | 1.28 | 4.34 | — | 3.95 | 5.90 | 6.42 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.95 | — | 4.26 | 14.26 | — | 4.16 | 21.93 | 16.49 | 15.96 | 13.57 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.73 | 2.73 | -11.84 | 0.55 | 3.75 | 4.06 | 2.79 | -5.37 | 0.92 | 1.09 | 0.67 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.96 | 2.96 | 2.85 | 2.44 | 3.30 | 3.20 | 1.84 | 1.90 | 1.89 | 1.59 | 1.97 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.89 | 1.89 | 1.51 | 1.33 | 1.93 | 2.06 | 1.33 | 1.28 | 1.10 | 0.98 | 1.31 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.91 | 1.17 | 0.22 | 0.56 | 0.31 | 0.27 | 0.58 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.27 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.62 | 2.62 | 2.24 | 2.74 | 2.43 | 2.48 | 3.05 | 2.80 | 2.51 | 2.60 | 2.49 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 52.11 | 48.43 | 41.98 | 56.31 | 61.37 | 63.80 | 78.94 | 81.73 | 96.01 | 96.74 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.2% | 2.4% | 3.4% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 1.9% |
| Payout Ratio | 1900.0% | 1900.0% | — | 46.2% | 42.7% | 7.6% | 31.8% | — | 12.7% | 52.6% | 7700.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | — | 3.9% | 4.1% | 17.3% | 4.1% | — | 10.4% | 2.1% | 0.0% |
| FCF Yield | 7.8% | 8.0% | — | 6.3% | 1.7% | — | 8.4% | 1.6% | 1.8% | 2.6% | 4.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.5% | 8.7% | 6.8% | 3.8% | 8.3% | 0.0% | 4.1% | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.2% | 2.4% | 8.0% | 10.5% | 8.5% | 5.1% | 9.6% | 1.5% | 5.4% | 1.3% | 2.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $46M | $46M | $50M | $54M | $56M | $61M | $61M | $63M | $64M | $62M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ASH stock.
Ashland Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 880.7x. The historical average is 15.8x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Ashland Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 15.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.1x.
Ashland Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 0.2%. The historical average is 7.8%.
Based on historical data, Ashland Inc. is trading at a P/E of 880.7x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Ashland Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.16% with a payout ratio of 1900.0%.
Ashland Inc. has 32.3% gross margin and 5.6% operating margin.
Ashland Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Recurring large non-operating charges
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Forward Multiples Diverge From Trailing Losses
Based on reported figures, ASH trades at 21.79x forward earnings and 10.32x forward EV/EBITDA, a sharp contrast with its negative trailing P/E of -4.17, suggesting the market is pricing a recovery in earnings that has not yet appeared in reported results.
The gap between trailing and forward multiples reflects the distortion created by large impairment and charge-driven losses rather than a stable earnings base. Against a 1.85x price-to-book ratio and 1.92x price-to-sales, the market appears to be valuing the tangible operating asset base and revenue stream more than current earnings. Investors should monitor whether the forward estimates hold, since a forward P/E above 20x leaves limited room for disappointment relative to peers such as Balchem and RPM that trade at similar or higher multiples on more consistent profitability.
Margins Swing on Charges, Not Operations
As reported in quarterly statements, ASH's operating margin ranged from -11.2% to 12.8% over ten quarters, with net margin reaching -160.3% in 2025Q3, indicating that discrete items rather than steady operating scaling drive the bottom line.
Gross margin recovered to 35.9% in 2026Q4, which suggests improving mix or pricing, yet operating margin of 5.8% in the same quarter sits well below the gross figure, implying substantial operating expense or residual charges. The sharp divergence between gross and net margins indicates that the reported earnings base is heavily influenced by non-recurring items. Analysts should normalize for these charges before using net margin as a measure of true earning power.
ROIC Stuck Near Zero Through Charges
According to the reported ratio history, ASH's ROIC has hovered between -0.1% and 1.4% across ten quarters, a level far below the 12% to 12% range of higher-returning peers such as Balchem and RPM, suggesting capital is not compounding.
Returns on invested capital remain depressed even as the equity base has shrunk through charges, which means the denominator is falling without a corresponding lift in earnings. ROE and ROA both sit near zero, consistent with a business that is currently absorbing its own write-downs. The recovery in returns depends on whether gross margin gains persist long enough to flow through operating income to the bottom line.
Low Debt Load Masks Coverage Volatility
Based on reported figures, ASH's debt-to-EBITDA moved between roughly 13x and 30x while interest coverage swung from -38.1x to 5.5x, showing that coverage metrics are driven by charge timing rather than a steady debt service capacity.
Debt-to-equity has risen from 0.49 to 0.80 largely because equity has contracted, not because borrowing increased, as total debt has stayed near $1.4B to $1.6B. Interest coverage appears unreliable as a signal given the distortion from one-time items, so cash-based coverage should carry more weight. Refinancing risk appears manageable given the current ratio of 2.96 and rebuilt cash balance, though this assessment depends on the underlying data and should be verified against debt maturity schedules.
Liquidity Rebuilt From a Low Base
As reported in the quarterly balance sheets, ASH's current ratio improved to 2.96 and quick ratio to 1.89, with cash rising from $207M at year-end 2025 to $480M in 2026Q4, suggesting a meaningful rebuild of short-term buffers.
The quick ratio remaining above 1.8 indicates that liquidity does not depend heavily on inventory conversion, which is useful given the commodity-sensitive Intermediates segment. Under a severe stress scenario, the current cash position and receivables would likely cover near-term obligations, though the inventory days figure of 140 to 170 suggests slow stock turnover that could weigh on cash if demand softens. The liquidity profile appears stronger than the earnings profile would suggest.
Lagging Peers on Returns and Margins
Based on the supplied peer data, ASH's ROE of -0.9% and net margin of -3.2% trail every peer in the group, with RPM reporting 21.1% ROE and Balchem 14.9% net margin, pointing to gaps that appear structural rather than purely cyclical.
The return gap is wide enough that it likely reflects business mix, since ASH carries exposure to the lower-margin Intermediates segment that peers such as Balchem and Innospec do not share. ASH's low leverage at 0.80 debt-to-equity is comparable to peers, so the gap is not a balance sheet issue. Whether the gap closes depends on whether the portfolio pruning shifts the earnings mix toward higher-margin Life Sciences over the coming periods.
Misapplied Metric: Trailing P/E Distortion
Trailing P/E is most commonly misapplied to ASH, because its reported negative value of -4.17 reflects charge-driven losses rather than operating earnings, and it obscures the cash generation evident in the quarterly operating cash flow figures.
Using trailing P/E to judge ASH's valuation risks either dismissing the stock or misreading the pricing signal, since the negative figure carries no information about underlying earning power. Enterprise value to normalized EBITDA, or price to free cash flow adjusted for working capital timing, would better reflect the cash-generating base. Analysts should treat the forward P/E as a directional indicator while recognizing that its reliability depends on the credibility of management guidance after the recent EPS miss.