Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -91.6%. (2009–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $467M | $234M | $954M | $1.1B | $464M | $1.5B | $440M | $187M | $51M | $114M | $96M |
| Enterprise Value | $453M | $221M | $931M | $1.1B | $302M | $1.5B | $432M | $192M | $51M | $107M | $78M |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.19 | — | 69.88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.72 | 0.86 | 2.11 | 4.59 | 2.57 | 12.46 | 4.39 | 1.34 | 0.48 | 1.02 | 0.81 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.98 | 0.99 | 1.55 | 2.25 | 1.04 | 11.80 | 6.49 | 3.17 | 0.72 | 1.13 | 0.83 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 14.19 | 7.12 | 20.95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.81 | 2.06 | 4.59 | 1.68 | 11.95 | 4.31 | 1.38 | 0.49 | 0.96 | 0.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 11.79 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | 0.04 | 34.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 17.0% | 17.0% | 40.4% | 23.8% | 2.8% | 8.2% | 14.6% | 18.9% | 12.1% | 16.7% | 19.8% |
| Operating Margin | -19.0% | -19.0% | 12.0% | -20.6% | -43.9% | -33.4% | -21.5% | -10.2% | -32.5% | -17.1% | -9.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -143.7% | -143.7% | 3.0% | -19.2% | -45.9% | -30.5% | -21.7% | -10.5% | -33.0% | -17.3% | -10.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -91.6% | -91.6% | 2.4% | -9.8% | -28.7% | -37.8% | -34.4% | -22.5% | -40.2% | -17.8% | -10.1% |
| ROA | -59.8% | -59.8% | 1.7% | -6.8% | -20.0% | -26.5% | -21.7% | -14.4% | -30.9% | -14.9% | -8.8% |
| ROIC | -9.5% | -9.5% | 7.6% | -9.6% | -33.7% | -48.0% | -26.2% | -15.7% | -30.8% | -15.0% | -9.0% |
| ROCE | -9.1% | -9.1% | 7.7% | -8.3% | -22.3% | -35.3% | -27.6% | -19.0% | -38.1% | -17.5% | -9.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 2.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.06 | -0.04 | -0.00 | -0.36 | -0.48 | -0.12 | 0.08 | 0.01 | -0.07 | -0.16 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | -0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 0.94 | 0.94 | 2.26 | -7.60 | -15.19 | -160.98 | -89.87 | -34.87 | -64.73 | -103.44 | -76.33 |
Net cash position: cash ($157M) exceeds total debt ($144M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.90 | 3.90 | 3.72 | 3.41 | 4.68 | 3.07 | 3.38 | 1.50 | 1.61 | 2.21 | 2.77 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.29 | 3.29 | 3.29 | 2.91 | 4.40 | 2.74 | 2.44 | 1.22 | 1.30 | 1.80 | 2.06 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.53 | 2.53 | 2.01 | 1.79 | 3.56 | 2.09 | 1.18 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.67 | 0.51 | 0.34 | 0.28 | 0.66 | 1.03 | 1.35 | 1.05 | 0.90 | 0.87 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.89 | 5.89 | 5.67 | 4.64 | 7.78 | 9.32 | 6.54 | 12.90 | 12.53 | 10.43 | 7.34 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 47.49 | 87.97 | 107.02 | 116.06 | 61.30 | 57.14 | 84.47 | 89.41 | 87.51 | 54.36 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 1.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.3% | 0.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.3% | 0.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $83M | $80M | $69M | $39M | $30M | $26M | $24M | $24M | $23M | $23M |
Manufacturing scale-up execution risk
Based on current market data, the company trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 1.72, which suggests that investors are pricing the firm as a speculative growth option on EV safety mandates rather than a traditional industrial manufacturer with established, predictable earnings streams or consistent historical profitability.
The absence of a meaningful P/E ratio and the forward EV/EBITDA of 27.82 indicate that the market is heavily discounting current losses in anticipation of future scale. This valuation appears to hinge entirely on the successful conversion of long-term OEM supply agreements into high-margin revenue, a scenario that remains unproven given the recent contraction in top-line performance.
As reported in recent financial statements, the company's ROIC has fluctuated significantly, reaching a negative 7.9% in 2026Q1, which underscores the difficulty of generating adequate returns on the substantial capital deployed toward the Georgia manufacturing facility during this ongoing and volatile strategic transition period.
The erratic nature of these returns suggests that the firm is currently in a capital-intensive phase where asset utilization is insufficient to cover the cost of investment. Investors should monitor whether the company can achieve positive, sustainable returns on invested capital as the EV thermal barrier segment matures and moves beyond the initial ramp-up phase.
According to quarterly data, the cash conversion cycle has expanded to 142 days in 2026Q1, reflecting a deterioration in working capital efficiency that appears driven by elevated inventory levels and extended collection periods compared to the more streamlined operational cycles observed in the 2024 fiscal year.
The increase in days inventory outstanding to 93 days suggests potential challenges in aligning production output with actual customer demand in the EV segment. This inefficiency ties up critical liquidity, forcing the company to rely more heavily on its cash reserves to fund operations while waiting for inventory to convert into realized revenue.
Based on the most recent balance sheet, the company maintains a current ratio of 2.88, which provides a necessary buffer to navigate the current period of negative operating margins and significant capital expenditures associated with the ongoing expansion of its specialized aerogel manufacturing capabilities in Georgia.
While the liquidity position appears adequate for the near term, the reliance on cash reserves to offset operational burn warrants close monitoring. The company's ability to maintain this liquidity without further dilutive financing will depend on its success in stabilizing gross margins and accelerating the throughput of its high-growth EV product lines.
The price-to-earnings ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for this business model, as it obscures the company's current status as a pre-commercialization growth entity where heavy R&D and CAPEX investments intentionally suppress net income to build long-term competitive advantages in the EV thermal barrier market.
Using P/E to evaluate this firm ignores the non-cash charges and strategic investments that currently distort the bottom line. Analysts should instead focus on metrics like EV/Revenue or the growth in design-ins for the PyroThin product line, which better capture the underlying value of the company's proprietary technology and its potential as a regulatory hedge for automotive OEMs.
Includes 30+ ratios · 16 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ASPN stock.
Aspen Aerogels, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1.2x. The historical average is 69.9x.
Aspen Aerogels, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -91.6%. The historical average is -62.6%.
Based on historical data, Aspen Aerogels, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1.2x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Aspen Aerogels, Inc. has 17.0% gross margin and -19.0% operating margin.