Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 11.5x · EV/EBITDA 10.2x · ROE 5.0%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $66M | $53M | $45M | $56M | $68M | $66M | $53M | $73M | $73M | $77M | $70M |
| Enterprise Value | $91M | $77M | $129M | $157M | $183M | $98M | $136M | $152M | $146M | $159M | $115M |
| P/E Ratio → | 11.47 | 9.38 | 12.76 | — | 9.16 | 9.41 | 11.59 | 12.00 | 9.37 | 23.06 | 30.83 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.75 | 0.60 | 0.53 | 0.72 | 1.03 | 1.03 | 0.85 | 1.13 | 1.19 | 1.31 | 1.24 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.54 | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.74 |
| P/FCF | 32.07 | 25.56 | 46.14 | 11.32 | 21.59 | 7.59 | — | 35.40 | 12.45 | 16.03 | 13.45 |
| P/OCF | 20.76 | 16.55 | 16.76 | 8.83 | 12.97 | 6.65 | — | 14.98 | 9.10 | 10.26 | 10.64 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.87 | 1.53 | 2.03 | 2.78 | 1.52 | 2.15 | 2.35 | 2.38 | 2.69 | 2.03 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.18 | 8.67 | 19.90 | — | 16.20 | 9.05 | 17.42 | 16.01 | 13.30 | 15.34 | 22.90 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.33 | 11.35 | 29.32 | — | 19.89 | 11.15 | 23.40 | 19.95 | 15.45 | 18.28 | 35.77 |
| EV / FCF | — | 37.40 | 132.14 | 32.01 | 58.47 | 11.24 | — | 73.30 | 25.00 | 32.95 | 22.00 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 62.4% | 62.4% | 62.9% | 58.2% | 87.0% | 86.5% | 79.6% | 76.6% | 82.1% | 83.7% | 79.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 7.7% | 5.2% | -5.7% | 14.0% | 13.6% | 9.2% | 11.8% | 15.4% | 14.7% | 5.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.4% | 6.4% | 4.3% | -4.3% | 11.3% | 11.0% | 7.3% | 9.3% | 12.7% | 5.6% | 4.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 5.0% | 5.0% | 3.4% | -3.2% | 6.7% | 6.4% | 4.5% | 6.1% | 8.0% | 3.5% | 2.2% |
| ROA | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.3% | -0.2% | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.2% |
| ROIC | 2.5% | 2.5% | 1.5% | -1.4% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 2.1% | 2.8% | 3.4% | 3.4% | 1.2% |
| ROCE | 3.3% | 3.3% | 2.2% | -2.5% | 5.1% | 4.4% | 3.0% | 4.2% | 5.5% | 5.0% | 1.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.95 | 1.13 | 1.30 | 0.62 | 1.09 | 1.02 | 1.10 | 1.22 | 0.82 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 8.47 | 8.47 | 15.69 | — | 12.25 | 6.74 | 14.61 | 10.62 | 9.86 | 11.18 | 15.70 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.20 | 0.78 | 0.99 | 1.09 | 0.27 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.47 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.75 | 2.75 | 12.95 | — | 10.22 | 2.94 | 10.58 | 8.28 | 6.68 | 7.88 | 8.90 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 11.84 | 86.01 | 20.69 | 36.88 | 3.65 | — | 37.90 | 12.55 | 16.93 | 8.55 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.14 | -0.18 | 1.08 | 1.16 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.81 | 0.99 | 0.41 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.1% | 3.8% | 4.5% | 3.7% | 2.9% | 2.6% | 3.2% | 2.2% | 1.9% | 1.4% | 1.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 35.3% | 35.3% | 56.1% | — | 26.4% | 24.2% | 37.3% | 27.2% | 17.3% | 33.8% | 40.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.7% | 10.7% | 7.8% | — | 10.9% | 10.6% | 8.6% | 8.3% | 10.7% | 4.3% | 3.2% |
| FCF Yield | 3.1% | 3.9% | 2.2% | 8.8% | 4.6% | 13.2% | — | 2.8% | 8.0% | 6.2% | 7.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 3.5% | 3.2% | 4.4% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.1% | 3.8% | 7.8% | 3.7% | 2.9% | 2.6% | 3.5% | 5.7% | 5.1% | 5.9% | 1.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $17M | $17M | $17M | $17M | $17M | $17M | $17M | $18M | $19M | $19M |
Regional CRE concentration risk
As reported in recent financial data, ASRV trades at a P/B multiple of 0.54, which, based on historical trends and peer comparisons, suggests the market is pricing the bank as a distressed commodity balance sheet rather than a specialized franchise with unique union-pension relationships.
The significant discount to tangible book value indicates that investors remain skeptical of the bank's ability to generate a return on equity that exceeds its cost of capital. This valuation gap appears to reflect both the stagnant growth profile and the persistent earnings volatility that has characterized the bank's recent performance.
According to quarterly performance metrics, the bank's ROE has struggled to consistently exceed 2.0%, a trend that, based on DuPont analysis, is primarily driven by a compressed net interest margin and an inability to leverage non-interest income to offset high operating costs.
The bank's profitability is hampered by a high efficiency ratio, which suggests that the cost of maintaining its physical branch network and regulatory compliance infrastructure consumes the majority of its core earnings. Without a meaningful expansion in fee-based trust income or a reduction in the cost-to-income ratio, the bank's return on equity is likely to remain under pressure.
Based on recent filings, the efficiency ratio has fluctuated between 52.3% and 64.8% over the last ten quarters, indicating that AmeriServ faces significant difficulty in achieving operating leverage while managing the high fixed costs associated with its regional branch footprint.
The persistent NIM compression to 0.7% highlights the bank's vulnerability to deposit beta pressures, which effectively limits its ability to expand margins in the current interest rate environment. Investors should monitor whether management can successfully pivot toward higher-margin digital services to improve these efficiency metrics over the medium term.
As indicated by regulatory filings, the equity-to-assets ratio has remained stable at approximately 0.08, providing a modest capital cushion that, while adequate for current operations, remains sensitive to potential credit quality deterioration within the bank's specialized construction loan portfolio.
The bank's capital position appears sufficient to meet regulatory requirements, yet the lack of significant capital accumulation suggests limited capacity for aggressive growth or enhanced shareholder returns. The stability of this ratio is heavily dependent on the bank's ability to maintain earnings consistency and avoid large, lumpy loan loss provisions.
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to AmeriServ, as reported in market data, because it fails to account for the extreme volatility in loan loss provisioning that can artificially depress or inflate earnings in any given quarter, thereby obscuring the bank's underlying operational health.
Investors should prioritize P/TBV and core pre-provision net revenue (PPNR) over P/E multiples to better assess the bank's true valuation. Relying on P/E in this context may lead to erroneous conclusions about the bank's profitability, as it ignores the cyclical nature of the bank's specialized union-labor construction lending and the resulting impact on earnings quality.
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ASRV stock.
AmeriServ Financial, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 11.5x. The historical average is 25.6x. This places it at the 44th percentile of its historical range.
AmeriServ Financial, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 21.4x.
AmeriServ Financial, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 5.0%. The historical average is 3.6%.
Based on historical data, AmeriServ Financial, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 11.5x. This is at the 44th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
AmeriServ Financial, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 3.07% with a payout ratio of 35.3%.
AmeriServ Financial, Inc. has 62.4% gross margin and 7.7% operating margin.
AmeriServ Financial, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 8.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.