Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 78.0x · EV/EBITDA 19.5x · ROE 4.2%. (2015–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.8B | $1.2B | $1.5B | $1.8B | $1.3B | $3.3B | $684M | $670M | $753M | $688M | $31M |
| Enterprise Value | $2.4B | $1.9B | $1.7B | $1.8B | $1.3B | $3.3B | $751M | $824M | $659M | $574M | $22M |
| P/E Ratio → | 78.00 | 53.93 | 35.03 | 29.69 | 29.89 | 48.34 | 18.09 | 47.21 | 68.45 | 26.67 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.56 | 0.38 | 0.75 | 1.30 | 1.18 | 4.31 | 1.85 | 1.20 | 1.45 | 1.92 | 0.70 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.17 | 2.19 | 2.96 | 4.39 | 2.42 | 6.53 | 1.54 | 1.86 | 1.85 | 2.05 | 3.61 |
| P/FCF | 17.03 | 11.72 | 34.43 | 45.41 | 22.80 | 65.27 | 15.20 | 53.06 | 30.18 | 13.49 | — |
| P/OCF | 15.52 | 10.69 | 29.13 | 26.42 | 16.43 | 47.43 | 14.82 | 49.02 | 28.83 | 12.96 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.59 | 0.84 | 1.32 | 1.13 | 4.27 | 2.03 | 1.47 | 1.27 | 1.61 | 0.50 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.54 | 15.08 | 14.53 | 17.88 | 10.60 | 28.56 | 30.74 | 16.24 | 5.91 | 10.14 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 30.92 | 20.93 | 14.96 | 17.27 | 13.65 | 39.74 | 65.94 | 26.94 | 7.93 | 11.54 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 17.93 | 38.58 | 46.10 | 21.81 | 64.64 | 16.70 | 65.20 | 26.45 | 11.26 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | 9.3% | 13.3% | 15.5% | 17.4% | 23.0% | 5.9% | 16.6% | 26.8% | 17.9% | 22.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 2.5% | 4.4% | 6.1% | 9.1% | 12.7% | 1.6% | 5.8% | 17.7% | 10.5% | -14.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.7% | 0.7% | 2.1% | 4.4% | 3.9% | 8.9% | -6.4% | 2.5% | 2.1% | 7.2% | -21.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.2% | 4.2% | 9.3% | 12.5% | 8.4% | 14.4% | -5.9% | 3.7% | 2.9% | 15.0% | -109.3% |
| ROA | 1.3% | 1.3% | 3.8% | 6.4% | 4.9% | 8.2% | -3.1% | 2.3% | 2.2% | 10.1% | -47.8% |
| ROIC | 6.2% | 6.2% | 11.8% | 13.5% | 16.0% | 14.9% | 0.9% | 5.9% | 25.8% | 25.4% | — |
| ROCE | 6.1% | 6.1% | 10.5% | 11.0% | 13.3% | 13.5% | 0.9% | 6.1% | 22.4% | 19.1% | -54.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.93 | 1.93 | 0.92 | 0.78 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 8.68 | 8.68 | 4.02 | 3.14 | 1.88 | 1.74 | 10.66 | 5.06 | 0.12 | 0.11 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.16 | 0.36 | 0.07 | -0.11 | -0.06 | 0.15 | 0.42 | -0.23 | -0.34 | -1.06 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.22 | 5.22 | 1.56 | 0.27 | -0.48 | -0.28 | 2.75 | 3.02 | -0.84 | -2.00 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 6.21 | 4.15 | 0.69 | -0.99 | -0.63 | 1.49 | 12.14 | -3.74 | -2.23 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.79 | 1.79 | 3.44 | 6.58 | 11.94 | 15.41 | 4.51 | 6.46 | 148.41 | 624.81 | -14.20 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.75 | 2.11 | 2.88 | 3.53 | 2.94 | 3.12 | 2.40 | 1.32 | 1.82 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.75 | 2.11 | 2.88 | 3.53 | 2.94 | 3.12 | 2.40 | 1.32 | 1.82 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 1.36 | 1.98 | 2.50 | 2.27 | 2.08 | 1.50 | 1.10 | 1.25 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.43 | 1.50 | 1.49 | 1.18 | 0.89 | 0.45 | 0.77 | 1.01 | 0.73 | 2.25 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 46.76 | 58.27 | 38.89 | 38.20 | 46.84 | 59.76 | 64.42 | 40.34 | 20.53 | 33.10 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.3% | 3.4% | 1.0% | 0.9% | 7.5% | 9.2% | 2.4% | 1.5% | — |
| Payout Ratio | 35.1% | 35.1% | 9.4% | 102.2% | 31.1% | 45.1% | — | 437.2% | 163.9% | 40.5% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.3% | 1.9% | 2.9% | 3.4% | 3.3% | 2.1% | 5.5% | 2.1% | 1.5% | 3.8% | — |
| FCF Yield | 5.9% | 8.5% | 2.9% | 2.2% | 4.4% | 1.5% | 6.6% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 7.4% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.9% | 1.3% | 0.1% | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 1.1% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.3% | 1.9% | 0.3% | 4.0% | 1.7% | 1.1% | 7.6% | 10.3% | 3.0% | 2.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $49M | $48M | $47M | $46M | $45M | $37M | $36M | $38M | $29M | $5M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ASTH stock.
Astrana Health, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 78.0x. The historical average is 39.7x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Astrana Health, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 19.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 16.6x.
Astrana Health, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 4.2%. The historical average is -4.5%.
Based on historical data, Astrana Health, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 78.0x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Astrana Health, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.45% with a payout ratio of 35.1%.
Astrana Health, Inc. has 9.3% gross margin and 2.5% operating margin.
Astrana Health, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 8.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Thin margins and high leverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression Masks Underlying Leverage
Gross margin fell to 10.7% in 2026Q2 from 11.9% a year earlier, per the latest quarterly report, while net margin improved to 2.0% from 1.4%, indicating a mix shift toward lower-margin capitated contracts.
The 10.7% gross margin in 2026Q2, down from 11.9% in 2025Q2, suggests that the revenue mix is increasingly weighted toward lower-margin risk contracts, consistent with the 56% revenue surge. Operating margin expanded to 3.5% from 3.1% year-over-year, but the absolute level remains thin, implying that SG&A costs are scaling nearly in line with revenue. The net margin of 2.0% is a slight improvement but still leaves the company highly sensitive to utilization spikes or claims cost inflation, as evidenced by the 0.71% net margin reported in the prior period.
Return on Capital Decays Amid Rapid Expansion
ROIC fell to 2.2% in 2026Q2 from 3.8% in 2024Q2, per the latest financials, as asset growth outpaced earnings, indicating that the acquisition-driven expansion is not yet generating adequate returns on invested capital.
ROIC has declined from 4.6% in 2024Q1 to 2.2% in 2026Q2, while ROE has similarly compressed from 3.4% to 3.4% over the same period, despite a doubling of total assets. This suggests that the $548.6M acquisition in 2025Q3 has not yet delivered the expected earnings uplift, and the goodwill-heavy balance sheet (goodwill at $887M, over 100% of equity) may be diluting returns. The modest 4.2% ROE, combined with a debt-to-equity of 1.64, implies that the company is leveraging up to fund growth that is currently earning below its cost of capital, a trend investors should monitor for signs of value creation or destruction.
Working Capital Efficiency Shows Strain
The current ratio fell to 1.23 in 2026Q2 from 1.51 in 2024Q1, per the balance sheet, while DSO rose to 46 days from 37 days, indicating that the company is collecting receivables more slowly as it scales.
DSO increased from 37 days in 2024Q1 to 46 days in 2026Q2, suggesting that the rapid revenue growth is accompanied by slower collections, possibly due to the complexity of capitated contracts. The current ratio has deteriorated from 1.51 to 1.23 over the same period, reflecting a tighter liquidity position as debt-funded acquisitions consume cash. The cash conversion cycle is not calculable due to missing DIO data, but the rising DSO and falling current ratio indicate that working capital efficiency is weakening, which could pressure cash flow if the trend continues.
Leverage Climbs as Debt-Fueled Growth Continues
Debt-to-equity rose to 1.64 in 2026Q2 from 0.96 in 2024Q1, per the latest balance sheet, while interest coverage fell to 2.70 from 4.16, indicating that debt service is becoming less comfortable.
The debt-to-equity ratio has nearly doubled from 0.96 to 1.64 over the last ten quarters, with total debt reaching $979.4M, reflecting the debt-financed acquisition strategy. Interest coverage has deteriorated from 4.16 in 2024Q1 to 2.70 in 2026Q2, suggesting that operating income is less sufficient to cover interest expenses, though still above the 1.0 threshold. The D/EBITDA ratio of 22.67 in 2026Q2 is elevated, but this is partly due to the low EBITDA margin; investors should monitor whether the raised guidance translates into EBITDA growth that can bring leverage down.
Liquidity Buffer Thins Despite Cash Cushion
The current ratio fell to 1.23 in 2026Q2 from 1.51 in 2024Q1, per the balance sheet, while cash decreased to $400.8M from $334.8M, indicating a tighter liquidity position despite a $429M cash cushion in 2025Q4.
The current ratio has declined from 1.51 to 1.23 over the last ten quarters, suggesting that current liabilities are growing faster than current assets, partly due to increased medical claims payable. The quick ratio equals the current ratio at 1.23, indicating that inventory is not a significant factor, which is typical for a services-based model. While the $400.8M cash balance provides a buffer, the declining current ratio and rising debt levels suggest that liquidity could become strained if cash flows deteriorate or if the company continues to deploy cash into acquisitions.
Misapplied Metric: Gross Margin
Gross margin is often misapplied to Astrana Health as a profitability gauge, but the 10.7% figure reflects the pass-through nature of capitated revenue, obscuring the true earning power of the Care Enablement segment.
In a risk-bearing model, gross margin is structurally low because most premium revenue is passed through to medical claims, making it a poor indicator of underlying profitability. The 10.7% gross margin in 2026Q2, while down from 11.9% a year ago, does not capture the potential high-margin revenue from the Care Enablement platform, which may be growing. Instead, investors should focus on the medical loss ratio (MLR) and the contribution margin of the Care Enablement segment, as these better reflect the company's ability to generate profits from its technology and administrative services. The current 0.71% net margin suggests that the overall business is near break-even, but the mix shift toward higher-margin services could improve profitability if management executes on its platform strategy.