Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 10.9x · EV/EBITDA 9.9x · ROE 80.7%. (2009–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.1B | $9.6B | $13.4B | $19.4B | $12.3B | $11.8B | $11.2B | $9.7B | $8.3B | $5.7B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $12.5B | $13.0B | $16.8B | $22.5B | $15.0B | $14.2B | $12.9B | $11.5B | $9.8B | $7.3B | $6.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | 10.95 | 11.29 | 14.42 | 32.34 | 45.66 | 25.53 | 18.43 | 20.13 | 19.98 | 18.89 | 21.19 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.81 | 0.86 | 1.12 | 1.82 | 1.33 | 1.42 | 1.42 | 1.30 | 1.24 | 0.93 | 0.92 |
| P/B Ratio | 8.44 | 8.70 | 13.38 | 18.55 | 12.40 | 11.32 | 10.43 | 11.32 | 12.32 | 10.17 | 9.33 |
| P/FCF | 9.57 | 10.11 | 14.73 | 101.06 | 23.36 | 18.04 | 17.69 | 22.90 | 20.55 | 19.68 | 16.30 |
| P/OCF | 8.74 | 9.24 | 13.30 | 75.02 | 20.41 | 16.08 | 15.54 | 17.58 | 16.66 | 15.50 | 14.00 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.16 | 1.40 | 2.11 | 1.62 | 1.70 | 1.64 | 1.54 | 1.46 | 1.18 | 1.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.94 | 10.35 | 10.91 | 19.11 | 24.43 | 17.15 | 15.33 | 15.27 | 14.60 | 12.41 | 12.02 |
| EV / EBIT | 11.42 | 12.10 | 11.89 | 21.71 | 30.86 | 21.13 | 17.88 | 17.11 | 16.31 | 14.31 | 14.09 |
| EV / FCF | — | 13.68 | 18.39 | 117.11 | 28.40 | 21.70 | 20.35 | 27.06 | 24.20 | 24.95 | 20.70 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 20.9% | 20.9% | 54.8% | 53.8% | 53.5% | 53.4% | 53.5% | 54.7% | 53.8% | 53.5% | 53.9% |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | 9.8% | 11.4% | 9.5% | 4.8% | 8.2% | 9.6% | 9.0% | 9.0% | 8.4% | 8.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 7.6% | 7.6% | 7.8% | 5.7% | 2.9% | 5.6% | 7.7% | 6.5% | 6.2% | 4.9% | 4.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 80.7% | 80.7% | 91.2% | 59.4% | 26.7% | 44.1% | 63.2% | 63.0% | 67.6% | 53.1% | 53.1% |
| ROA | 11.6% | 11.6% | 13.5% | 9.2% | 4.3% | 8.1% | 11.8% | 11.2% | 11.3% | 8.6% | 8.2% |
| ROIC | 18.6% | 18.6% | 24.3% | 19.5% | 9.4% | 16.6% | 21.1% | 21.0% | 21.3% | 19.0% | 19.8% |
| ROCE | 19.5% | 19.5% | 26.5% | 21.3% | 9.8% | 15.8% | 19.7% | 21.9% | 23.0% | 21.4% | 23.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.73 | 3.73 | 4.21 | 3.47 | 3.09 | 2.96 | 2.50 | 2.93 | 2.61 | 3.23 | 2.90 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.28 | 3.28 | 2.75 | 3.09 | 5.00 | 3.73 | 3.19 | 3.34 | 2.62 | 3.11 | 2.94 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 3.07 | 3.32 | 2.94 | 2.68 | 2.30 | 1.57 | 2.06 | 2.19 | 2.72 | 2.52 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.70 | 2.70 | 2.17 | 2.62 | 4.34 | 2.89 | 2.01 | 2.35 | 2.20 | 2.62 | 2.56 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.57 | 3.66 | 16.05 | 5.04 | 3.66 | 2.67 | 4.16 | 3.64 | 5.27 | 4.40 |
| Interest Coverage | 5.05 | 5.05 | 7.19 | 5.51 | 4.00 | 7.08 | 11.84 | 7.06 | 6.64 | 6.16 | 7.74 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.78 | 1.78 | 1.79 | 1.62 | 1.21 | 1.59 | 2.04 | 1.75 | 1.44 | 1.45 | 1.18 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.78 | 1.78 | 1.79 | 1.62 | 1.21 | 1.59 | 2.04 | 1.75 | 1.44 | 1.45 | 1.18 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.33 | 0.21 | 0.45 | 0.77 | 0.56 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.20 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.51 | 1.64 | 1.62 | 1.41 | 1.39 | 1.43 | 1.56 | 1.75 | 1.71 | 1.72 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 69.99 | 69.19 | 70.08 | 69.97 | 70.83 | 65.57 | 71.37 | 72.43 | 67.09 | 62.31 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.0% | 2.9% | 2.0% | 1.3% | 1.9% | 1.8% | 1.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | 1.8% | 1.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 32.4% | 32.4% | 28.7% | 41.9% | 86.8% | 44.8% | 29.7% | 30.4% | 27.3% | 34.3% | 35.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.1% | 8.9% | 6.9% | 3.1% | 2.2% | 3.9% | 5.4% | 5.0% | 5.0% | 5.3% | 4.7% |
| FCF Yield | 10.5% | 9.9% | 6.8% | 1.0% | 4.3% | 5.5% | 5.7% | 4.4% | 4.9% | 5.1% | 6.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 6.6% | 6.2% | 6.1% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 1.9% | 3.0% | 4.7% | 0.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 9.5% | 9.1% | 8.0% | 3.4% | 3.7% | 5.3% | 4.4% | 3.4% | 4.4% | 6.5% | 2.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $123M | $128M | $131M | $133M | $135M | $139M | $141M | $143M | $148M | $151M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 18 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BAH stock.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation's current P/E ratio is 10.9x. The historical average is 20.2x. This places it at the 13th percentile of its historical range.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 9.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.7x.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 80.7%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 49.7%.
Based on historical data, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation is trading at a P/E of 10.9x. This is at the 13th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation's current dividend yield is 2.96% with a payout ratio of 32.4%.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation has 20.9% gross margin and 9.8% operating margin.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Revenue contraction and high leverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple Hinges on Recovery
BAH trades at 11.15x trailing earnings and 10.07x EV/EBITDA, per reported multiples, below SAIC and CACI but above Leidos on P/E, implying the market expects a growth rebound despite recent contraction.
The forward P/E of 12.57 is higher than the trailing multiple, suggesting analysts anticipate earnings growth, yet the PEG of 1.16 indicates the stock is fairly valued relative to expected growth. Compared to peers, BAH's EV/EBITDA of 10.07 is lower than SAIC's 11.68 and CACI's 16.59, but its P/B of 8.59 is significantly higher, reflecting the market's premium on its intangible-heavy asset base and franchise value. This premium appears justified only if the revenue decline reverses; otherwise, the multiple may compress toward the peer average.
Margin Stability Masks Revenue Pressure
Operating margin held near 9-10% over the last four quarters, per reported figures, despite a 6.4% revenue decline, indicating cost discipline is offsetting top-line weakness, but gross margin volatility obscures true earning power.
Gross margin swung from 20.9% in 2026Q4 to 52.3% in 2027Q1, likely due to pass-through revenue recognition, making operating margin a more reliable profitability gauge. The stable operating margin around 9.75% suggests management is effectively controlling SG&A, but the labor-intensive model limits operating leverage. Net margin improved to 7.1% in 2027Q1 from 4.6% in 2024Q4, yet this is partly due to a lower tax rate and non-recurring items, so investors should focus on operating margin as the core earning power indicator.
ROIC Volatility Signals Capital Allocation Risk
ROIC fluctuated between 4.3% and 9.5% over the past ten quarters, per reported data, with the latest at 4.5%, suggesting that returns on invested capital are not compounding consistently and may be pressured by rising debt.
ROE spiked to 34.1% in 2025Q2 but has since normalized to 17.2%, indicating that the earlier peak was likely driven by one-time gains or a low equity base. The average ROIC of approximately 5.7% over the period is below the cost of capital, implying value destruction, though this may be understated due to the intangible-heavy asset base. The divergence between ROE and ROIC highlights the impact of leverage, as debt financing amplifies equity returns but does not improve underlying operational efficiency.
Working Capital Efficiency Shows Mixed Signals
DSO rose from 66 days in 2024Q4 to 73 days in 2027Q1, per reported figures, indicating slower collections, while DPO also increased, suggesting BAH is stretching supplier payments to manage cash flow amid revenue contraction.
The cash conversion cycle is not calculable due to missing DIO data, but the trend in DSO and DPO suggests that BAH is relying on working capital management to offset cash flow pressure. Asset turnover declined from 0.47 in 2025Q2 to 0.37 in 2027Q1, reflecting lower revenue relative to the asset base, which may be due to increased goodwill from acquisitions. The efficiency of the model is inherently limited by its labor intensity, so improvements in working capital metrics are unlikely to drive significant margin expansion.
Leverage Creep Threatens Financial Flexibility
Debt-to-equity surged to 3.46 in 2027Q1 from 0.27 in 2026Q3, per reported figures, while interest coverage fell to 6.23x, indicating that BAH's balance sheet is increasingly stretched and debt service is becoming less comfortable.
The dramatic increase in D/E is partly due to a temporary equity dip in 2026Q3, but the overall trend shows debt rising to $4.2B while equity stagnates near $1.2B. Interest coverage of 6.23x is still adequate but has declined from 13.39x in 2025Q2, suggesting that rising debt and stable operating income are compressing the safety margin. The high leverage, combined with revenue contraction, may limit BAH's ability to invest in growth or weather a prolonged budget downturn, and investors should monitor covenant compliance and refinancing risk.
Liquidity Buffer Thins as Cash Declines
Current ratio eased to 1.59 in 2027Q1 from 1.62 in 2024Q4, per reported data, while cash dropped from $885M to $540M, indicating a reduced cushion against operational shocks and potential stress under severe budget cuts.
The quick ratio equals the current ratio at 1.59, suggesting that inventory is not a significant factor, which is typical for a services firm. However, the declining cash balance and rising debt levels imply that BAH's liquidity position is becoming more vulnerable to a prolonged government shutdown or continuing resolution. While the current ratio remains above 1.0, the trend is concerning, and the company may need to rely on credit facilities or asset sales if cash flow deteriorates further.
Premium Valuation vs. Operational Parity
BAH's P/B of 8.59 is more than double SAIC's 3.92 and LDOS's 3.77, per peer data, yet its ROIC of 4.5% is below SAIC's 9.9% and LDOS's 17.1%, suggesting the market is pricing in superior growth or moat quality.
BAH's net margin of 7.1% is higher than SAIC's 4.9% and CACI's 5.6%, but its ROE of 17.2% is lower than SAIC's 27.2% and LDOS's 26.4%, indicating that leverage is not translating into superior returns. The valuation premium may be justified by BAH's higher concentration in intelligence and cyber work, which commands higher multiples, but the gap appears wide given the recent revenue contraction. Investors should monitor whether BAH can grow into its premium or if the multiple will converge toward peers as growth remains elusive.
Misapplied Metric: Gross Margin
Gross margin is the most misapplied ratio for BAH, per reported data, because it swings wildly due to pass-through revenue, obscuring the true profitability of its consulting services.
Analysts often compare BAH's gross margin to peers, but the inclusion of billable expenses makes this metric misleading. A more reliable measure is operating margin, which excludes pass-through costs and better reflects the firm's pricing power and cost control. Additionally, investors should adjust for non-recurring items and focus on revenue excluding billable expenses to assess organic growth. Using gross margin alone can lead to incorrect conclusions about BAH's competitive position and earning power.